On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, Don Drake wrote:
> Davide, any ETA on a fix?
Dunno yet.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Davide, any ETA on a fix?
Thanks.
-Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Francesco Vertova
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 2:55 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: mail loop?
At 21.55 16/02/06, you wrote:
>If I sen
At 21.55 16/02/06, you wrote:
>If I send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- with a trailing '.'
>After the .com, I get a mail loop error back.
I suppose "domain.com" is a local domain. This is a known issue (see
the thread on "local domain and trailing dot"). Queued for next
release. By now the
I meant to say drakeconsult.com is a custdomain on the
incoming.maillaunder.com server.
-Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Don Drake
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 9:13 PM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: mail loop
.6353
Thread-Index: AcYzOuL+MwTx77HzQweB6JECIm0p4w==
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 9:03 PM
To: XMail mailing list
Subject: [xmail
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, Don Drake wrote:
> If I send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- with a trailing '.'
> After the .com, I get a mail loop error back.
What does the Received: trace show?
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <> wrote on Thursday, June 23, 2005 10:50
AM:
> hi,
>
> is there someone who could help me in german?
It seems that your sendmail binary is from qmail and not XMails. Look at
the instructions here:
http://www.ubaight.com/xmail/BeginnersGuide.html#SendmailScript
--
-
To uns
hi,
is there someone who could help me in german?
regards
lars
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi,
no, this file is empty...
what can i do with this file?
but what did the file do with postifx? did i have to shutdown postfix?
the main problem, why i was pointed to this problem is, that a mail-form
sended with php (local) to a (local) domain was not received by xmail
it was spooled
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005, Lars wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> i get this answer ...
>
> server:/var/mail # telnet localhost 25
> Trying 127.0.0.1...
> Connected to localhost.
> Escape character is '^]'.
> 220 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [XMail 1.21 ESMTP Server]
> service ready; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 09:48:25 +0200
Did you d
hi,
i get this answer ...
server:/var/mail # telnet localhost 25
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [XMail 1.21 ESMTP Server]
service ready; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 09:48:25 +0200
regards
lars
Sönke Ruempler schrieb:
>Lars wrote:
>
>
>>hi
Lars wrote:
> hi,
>
> i had set up a linux server (suse 9.1) with xmail. everything works
> fine, my mails sended by an external mailer come in and a mail localy
> sended (to an external mailadress or another then the sended-domain)
> finds the way out :-) BUT if i send a mail from [EMAIL PROT
Eric,
I increase the value to 16 , it was 10.
Thank you!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Eric Garnice
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 10:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Mail Loop Problem
In server.tab check the
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Juan Hector Medina wrote:
>
>
> Hi Everybody...
>
> I just check my logs files and I see this error:
>
>
>
> [<01>] Error sending message
> [1096946315962.3160719390.4753.mail.
In server.tab check the value of "MaxMTAOps"
The default is 16. Setting this below 16 will cause erroneous loop errors.
- Eric
- Original Message -
From: "Juan Hector Medina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 12:29 PM
Subject: [xmail] Mail Loo
On Wed, 19 May 2004, ck wrote:
>
> ErrCode = -173
> ErrString = Mail loop detected
> Message blocked by mail loop check !
> SMTP-Error = "554 Message blocked by mail loop check"
>
> What does it mean?
Take a look at the Received: header chain in the message.
- Davide
-
To unsubscrib
Francesco Vertova wrote:
>At 12.11 12/05/04 -0500, you wrote:
>
>
>
>>Why Xmail decided to use the A record from the next DNS it was
>>able to talk with is beyond me.
>>
>>
>
>My dns reports MX information for bioenergy.com as Non-authoritative. It
>seems - I've seen this other times - that
At 12.11 12/05/04 -0500, you wrote:
>Why Xmail decided to use the A record from the next DNS it was
>able to talk with is beyond me.
My dns reports MX information for bioenergy.com as Non-authoritative. It
seems - I've seen this other times - that in such a case the XMail internal
resolver fail
Davide Libenzi wrote:
>On Wed, 12 May 2004, Bill Healy wrote:
>
>
>
>>You have an A record that points back to yourself
>>bioenergy.com. 3580IN A 207.67.28.220
>>
>>Don't know why xmail is giving preference to the A record when an MX
>>record exists. Interesting
>>bio
gt;To:'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>Subject: [xmail] Re: Mail loop detected - Can't seem to find the problem.
>
>On Wed, 12 May 2004, Bill Healy wrote:
>
>> You have an A record that points back to yourself
>> bioenergy.com. 3580IN A
On Wed, 12 May 2004, Bill Healy wrote:
> You have an A record that points back to yourself
> bioenergy.com. 3580IN A 207.67.28.220
>
> Don't know why xmail is giving preference to the A record when an MX
> record exists. Interesting
> bioenergy.com. 3529IN
You have an A record that points back to yourself
bioenergy.com. 3580IN A 207.67.28.220
Don't know why xmail is giving preference to the A record when an MX
record exists. Interesting
bioenergy.com. 3529IN MX 10 64.122.83.163.
Bill
>--
On Wed, 12 May 2004, John Kielkopf wrote:
> Getting a "Mail loop detected" on a domain we host on our DNS server,
> and on our web servers, be do not host the mail (MX record points to
> customers server).
>
> This only happens on mail being sent from our mail server. The
> destination domain
Davide Libenzi wrote:
>On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Stephen Wilson wrote:
>
>
>
>>RaveRod wrote:
>>
>>
>>><>Is there any way to "de-loop" these messages? Would you have to
>>>remove the
>>>messages Received: headers manually and then resubmit the message?
>>>
>>>
>>I have not received any more
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Stephen Wilson wrote:
> RaveRod wrote:
> > <>Is there any way to "de-loop" these messages? Would you have to
> > remove the
> > messages Received: headers manually and then resubmit the message?
>
> I have not received any more loops. I think Mr. Libenzi fixed this
> proble
RaveRod wrote:
> <>Is there any way to "de-loop" these messages? Would you have to
> remove the
> messages Received: headers manually and then resubmit the message?
I have not received any more loops. I think Mr. Libenzi fixed this
problem quite quickly and concisely. Thank you very much Mr. Lib
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Mail loop detected?
At 09.11 27/04/04 -0500, you wrote:
>Just for clarity, how would this happen? I thought a mailloop would
>only effect that mailserver??? Confused...
XMail defines a mail loop as a message with more than (by default 16)
Recei
Hey, thanks for the info Francesco!
Ben
Francesco Vertova wrote:
>At 09.11 27/04/04 -0500, you wrote:
>
>
>>Just for clarity, how would this happen? I thought a mailloop would
>>only effect that mailserver??? Confused...
>>
>>
>
>XMail defines a mail loop as a message with more than (by
At 09.11 27/04/04 -0500, you wrote:
>Just for clarity, how would this happen? I thought a mailloop would
>only effect that mailserver??? Confused...
XMail defines a mail loop as a message with more than (by default 16)
Received: headers. It counts these headers and does not try to detect if a
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Liron Newman wrote:
> Yeah, happened here too.. Only 4 though. So it's not only you...
This was the genius that re-injected messages (I received about 200
bounces for mail loops):
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now carefully removed from the list. I miss a feature in Ecartis already.
n
>Behalf Of Francesco Vertova
>Sent: Tuesday, 27 April 2004 1:35 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [xmail] Re: Mail loop detected?
>
>At 23.20 27/04/04 +, you wrote:
>
>
>>5 emails I just received (from the XMail Discussion group) are in a Mail
>>loop.
&g
At 23.43 27/04/04 +, you wrote:
>Yeah I noticed those to. So these messages are as good as junk?
Yep. Unless you want to keep them to write an ad hoc filter ...
>Someone with a screwed up MS SMTPSVC mailserver is re-injecting old
>messages into the list. The original messages were posted betw
Yeah I noticed those to. So these messages are as good as junk?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Francesco Vertova
Sent: Tuesday, 27 April 2004 1:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Mail loop detected?
At 23.20 27/04/04 +
Well, I received you and Liron's messages fine. Seems strange.
At least now I know it's not my mailserver.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Fred
Sent: Tuesday, 27 April 2004 1:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re:
At 23.20 27/04/04 +, you wrote:
>5 emails I just received (from the XMail Discussion group) are in a Mail
>loop.
>
>This may seems a stupid question but how do I fix this?
Someone with a screwed up MS SMTPSVC mailserver is re-injecting old
messages into the list. The original messages were po
On [Tue, 27.04. 23:20], RaveRod wrote:
> 5 emails I just received (from the XMail Discussion group) are in a Mail
> loop.
>
>
> This may seems a stupid question but how do I fix this?
YOU can't fix it. Since the loop was built by someone else. It seems we all get
those :-P
--
Wiener Hilfswerk
I received 1 email detected as loop too. I think the problem is with
ecartis.
Fred
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of RaveRod
Sent: 27 avril, 2004 19:21
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Mail loop detected?
5 emails I just received (fr
Yeah, happened here too.. Only 4 though. So it's not only you...
RaveRod wrote:
>5 emails I just received (from the XMail Discussion group) are in a Mail
>loop.
>
>
>This may seems a stupid question but how do I fix this?
>
>
>
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail"
> Mail loops typically born due postmaster screw ups, so you don't want
> to notify the user about this. It will be up to the postmaster to fix
> the problem and re-inject the message.
What about 127.0.0.1 MX entries?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body o
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004, Sönke Ruempler wrote:
> in case of a mail loop the postmaster gets a message, but the sender not?
Mail loops typically born due postmaster screw ups, so you don't want to
notify the user about this. It will be up to the postmaster to fix the
problem and re-inject the messag
> my server oftentimes gives me a mail loop detected error even if the
recepient is a valid user. why is that so? how will i solve this problem?
below is a copy of the error message:
in server.tab set the MaxMTAOps higher
[MaxMTAOps]
Set the maximum number of MTA relay steps before to declare t
ECTED]'
Subject: [xmail] Re: Mail loop
Right around this area Received: from
dial81-131-81-189.in-addr.btopenworld.com (HELO
newserver.Wilby.local) (81.131.81.189)
by server-19.tower-17.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 28 Mar 2003 00:45:26
- of the headers it looks like a dialup users has downloa
Right around this area Received: from
dial81-131-81-189.in-addr.btopenworld.com (HELO
newserver.Wilby.local) (81.131.81.189)
by server-19.tower-17.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 28 Mar 2003 00:45:26
-
of the headers it looks like a dialup users has downloaded a POP3
mailbox and then is sending m
> You should use an "smtprelay" instead of an "smtp"
thanks.
so that post on the 2/jan/03 by [EMAIL PROTECTED] was wrong.
Louis Solomon
www.SteelBytes.com
- Original Message -
From: "Davide Libenzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "XMail mailing li
> MaxMTAOps += 1;
ehm yes, but thats only for that specific case. if the mail i quoted had one
more hop and i hat MaxMTAOps+=1, the problem would be there again. so as i
wrote, it's stupid that xmail declares a mail, that had more mta hops than
MaxMTAOps var, but that is in the end at the right p
45 matches
Mail list logo
