Re: [Xmame] How many fps can you get with scale2x?

2003-09-22 Thread mushroomblue
mine is doing this too. when I use -x11 1, my semi-transparent top panel is always visible in xmame, and it moves the beginning of the xmame fullscreen down approximately 30 pixels (the size of my panel). it didn't happen with GNOME 2.2, but started with GNOME 2.3.2, I believe. 2.4 stable does the

Re: [Xmame] xmame and slowness under gnome 2.4

2003-09-23 Thread mushroomblue
odd. I'm not having this problem. I'm using gnome 2.4, and the SDL renderer. On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 19:50, Mr. Mailing List wrote: > Under gnome 2.2 this was not an issue, but suddenly > under gnome 2.4, xmame roms run REAL slow. so i exit > out of X, and start fail safe session, with just a > ter

[Xmame] what frontends are compatible now?

2003-10-03 Thread mushroomblue
so xmame 0.74.1's removal of -nohotrod flags have officially killed gxmame, which was my favorite frontend. a recent look to CVS shows that nothing has changed in the last 12 days, so I think it's safe to say that it won't work with the current xmame for a while. anyone know of a good replacement f

Re: [Xmame] what frontends are compatible now?

2003-10-03 Thread mushroomblue
On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 15:55, ste wrote: > or... you could use the workaround... > "Options" Menu/Select "Default Options"/"Misc" tab. > Add the command-line options you need to the "use additional options" > and check the box off. tried it. still complains about -nohotrod. :) thanks, tho. :) __

Re: [Xmame] what frontends are compatible now?

2003-10-03 Thread mushroomblue
On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 15:42, sammy!!! wrote: > If you are using debian the version of gxmame in that is compatible. > Check the gxmame page (http://gxmame.sf.net) for the file to stick in > your sources.list file. well, hopefully the tarball also has the changes applied. I'm gonna download that

Re: [Xmame] what frontends are compatible now?

2003-10-03 Thread mushroomblue
interesting. although the tarball claims to have the patch applied, it still keeps passing the -nohotrod flag. > well, hopefully the tarball also has the changes applied. I'm gonna > download that and see if I can't recompile (I use gentoo, so deb's are > not real usefull). > > thanks. ___

Re: [Xmame] what frontends are compatible now?

2003-10-04 Thread mushroomblue
actually, the patch to 0.33 killed the app when a game was run, so I tried the patch on the sourceforge site for the CVS GTK2 build. works great. and being that gxmame was the last GTK 1.2 application I used, I'm even more content. :) thanks. On Sat, 2003-10-04 at 03:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [Xmame] what frontends are compatible now?

2003-10-04 Thread mushroomblue
> Not using XMMS? ;) real men use rhythmbox. :) ___ Xmame mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/xmame

Re: [Xmame] usb joysticks acting weird initially?

2003-10-17 Thread mushroomblue
also using gentoo. also using Xmame 0.74.1. also having the exact same problems with calibration. I use an EMS USB2 adapter and two Dual Shock pads. same calibration problem. I play Pac-Man (all games do it, but my baby likes watching her daddy play pac-man), and stick wants to go up at all times.

Re: [Xmame] usb joysticks acting weird initially?

2003-10-17 Thread mushroomblue
oh, and it didn't have this problem on any Xmame before 0.74.1. calibration doesn't do any good, and the analog sticks on the controllers are centered. it has to be a mame (or ebuild) thing, because every other app that uses the joystick drivers work fine (notably ZSNES) ___

Re: [Xmame] Lightgun support

2003-10-19 Thread mushroomblue
that would be second only to the power glove for devices I most want to replace a mouse with. :) ___ Xmame mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/xmame

Re: [Xmame] Greg Peter/Portland/IBM

2003-10-30 Thread mushroomblue
hopefully, this message was followed by a temporary unsubscribe from the mailing list. > I will be out of the office starting October 30, 2003 and will not return > until November 3, 2003. > > > > ___ > Xmame mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://

[Fwd: [Xmame] what frontends are compatible now?]

2003-11-08 Thread mushroomblue
private forward from David Frankland. didn't know how to post to the list. I notified him, and told him I'd forward this. -BEGIN FORWARD- Sorry for replying personally, but I can't work out how to reply to the mailing list. Perhaps you'd like to forward this to others. Anyway, I got aro

Re: [Xmame] EMSUSB2 and 2.6

2003-11-13 Thread mushroomblue
I sure hope so. if I can't use my controller, I'll have to stick with the 2.4.x releases. I'll compile a 2.6 test tonight, and report any issues I come up with. On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 21:48, Simon Roby wrote: > (not really xmame-related, but from what I can gather from previous threads > there

Re: [Xmame] EMSUSB2 and 2.6

2003-11-16 Thread mushroomblue
eedless to say this is really pissing me off, I hope Lik Sang will accept to > exchange it (AFAIK they never mentionned this issue at their site). > > Le 14 Novembre 2003 0009, mushroomblue a écrit : > > I sure hope so. if I can't use my controller, I'll have to stick with &

Re: [Xmame] Joystick problems

2003-11-17 Thread mushroomblue
out of curiosity, have you tried any other application that uses the joystick, i.e. ZSNES, Gens, etc? that'd be the first thing I'd try. failing that, does cat /dev/input/js0 do anything when you press buttons, move joystick? On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 00:40, Mark Wells wrote: > I am having great diff

Re: [Xmame] Joystick problems

2003-11-17 Thread mushroomblue
...and I take it you've tried to remap the buttons in the XMame configuration screens? On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 01:14, Mark Wells wrote: > I've installed libjsw-1.5.3 and the jscalibrator app sees and calibrates > the stick just fine. And a cat of /dev/input/js0 sees data for all axes > and buttons.

Re: [Xmame] Can't wait for mame .77?

2003-11-17 Thread mushroomblue
that makes for a really interesting idea. is there any reason to duplicate the full mame tree, when a small xmame patch could just be installed over the regular mame source? or even provide the option to download either the full source, or just a small package to merge with any subsequent releases

Re: [Xmame] Can't wait for mame .77?

2003-11-17 Thread mushroomblue
> But I'm not sure if adopting a scheme like this, which is pretty much what > AdvanceMAME does, would make releases that much faster, since I still need > to make sure various targets build with gcc 3.3.x and 2.95.x and sometimes > have to fix problems in either the core or the xmame sources. we

Re: [Xmame] GXMame 0.34 if finally out

2003-12-16 Thread mushroomblue
figures. I just updated CVS yesterday. :) now to get the official source, even though they're probably identical. :) > After lot of underground works, GXMame 0.34 is finally released, thanks > to Benoit Dumont, Priit Laes and Nicos Panayides, who port GXMame to > GTK2+ and made lot of improvemen

[Xmame] kernel 2.6 performance issues?

2003-12-19 Thread mushroomblue
so I've recently upgraded to the kernel 2.6 series (starting with test10), and have noticed that they're quite a bit slower with emulators. Playing Pacmania certainly shows tearing, and zsnes has major sound issues. this shouldn't be a problem playing either of these games on an Athlon 1Ghz with 5

Re: [Xmame] kernel 2.6 performance issues?

2003-12-20 Thread mushroomblue
ated. On Sat, 2003-12-20 at 02:43, Simon Roby wrote: > Ditto for me, same performance. Maybe mushroomblue configured something > differently in his new kernel... ___ Xmame mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/xmame

Re: [Xmame] kernel 2.6 performance issues?

2003-12-20 Thread mushroomblue
> Sure, post your .config as an attachment. I've been using the 2.6 test > kernels for a couple of months or so, and I haven't noticed any obvious > speed differences in emulation. I'll diff it with mine and see if > anything sticks out. consider it attached. # # Automatically generated make

Re: [Xmame] kernel 2.6 performance issues?

2003-12-20 Thread mushroomblue
> Attached is a diff between my .config and yours. When you upgraded to > 2.6, did you use your 2.4 .config file and just run "make oldconfig"? heck no. I figured that'd be a problem, being that much has changed. they didn't advise it back when 2.2 migrated to 2.4, and I figured it'd be the same

Re: [Xmame] kernel 2.6 performance issues?

2003-12-21 Thread mushroomblue
> I use Gentoo, 2.6 (since test-2) and ALSA as monolithic... Never had a > single problem with the sound... then perhaps the renicing XFree86 will do the trick. anyone know what the nice level of gentoo's xfree defaults at? cos I've never changed it. what's the command to set the priority back to

Re: [Xmame] PSX usb adaptor

2003-12-21 Thread mushroomblue
I believe both lik-sang.com and play-asia.com ship to most of europe. go get the EMS USB2 adapter. it's happy. > Does anyone know a website selling (and shipping in France) a good PSX > USB adaptor working out of the box (or almost) with XMame (the best > would be an adaptor supporting two PSXp

Re: [Xmame] New zip version roms

2003-12-27 Thread mushroomblue
could they be compressed in 7zip format? I've actually seen that before. it used 7zip for (MUCH) better compression, but made it incompatible with unix's unzip. ___ Xmame mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/xmam

Re: [Xmame] kernel 2.6 performance issues? (FOLLOWUP)

2004-01-01 Thread mushroomblue
about that whole 2.6 being slower thing: apparently I haven't gotten rid of all my newbie tendencies. I tried running xmame in fluxbox to rule out any other programs, and xmame didn't hiccup once. went back into GNOME and realized that gDesklets is a bloated pig of an application. disabled the _o

Re: [Xmame] mulitplayer xmame

2005-11-15 Thread mushroomblue
we had a bit of activity about the network port a few months back, but it looks like it stagnated while people were arguing about implementation. if you browse the mailing list archive, you'll see a bit of discussion. Kaillera is sort of a problem, as the dll is closed source, and the header files

Re: [Xmame] mulitplayer xmame

2005-11-15 Thread mushroomblue
a little more snooping around found that a large chunk of Kaillera was based off Justin Frankel's JNetLib (http://www.nullsoft.com/free/jnetlib/) which has source, and a unix port. yay. On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 22:30 -0700, mushroomblue wrote: > we had a bit of activity about the network po

Re: [Xmame] Only *9* Historic xmame versions still missing!

2005-12-01 Thread mushroomblue
so I guess this means we have 9 versions to go find? 0.27.2 0.28.2 0.29.1 0.29.3 0.33b4.1 0.33.1 0.33.2 0.34.1 0.35b10.2 0.35.2 I'm still wondering if tk/xulchris was just really drunk when he wrote his email. On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 15:34 -0800, Christopher Stone wrote: > Even if the versions pr