Derrik Pates wrote:
>
> Ok, not exactly related, but I wanted to find out if it would work - has
> anyone been able to get more than one ATI Rage128 working in a system?
> Particularly in a non-x86 system (in my case an Apple PPC G3 box)? I've
> tried to get such a setup working, but XFree86 (inc
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 07:52:16PM -0700, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
> > I'd like to propose a change to Xv standard, to add a function
> > "XvGetImage",
> > which could be used to transfer data from videoram to system memory. 2
> > possible situations it can be used:
>What's the prototype look lik
Is there an input driver for Linux's generic /dev/input/eventx
interface?
After glancing through the source and mailing list archives, it seems
that the wacom input driver does support it (see the functions with
names including "USB" in
programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/input/wacom/xf86Wacom.c), but th
Keith Parkins wrote:
>
> That did it! Everything works okay except for when I quit X. The monitor
> starts making a funny sound (so I shut it off) and virtual consols don't
> work. Do I need to enable video drivers from BootX on the Mac side?
Doing that and using Option "UseFBDev" should be a so
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I have a ATI Rage 128 (AGP) and I tried to use the DRI.
> Everything works well but I have the following message:
>
> kernel: [drm:r128_do_wait_for_fifo] *ERROR*
> r128_do_wait_for_fifo failed!
Make sure you are using the correct version of the kernel module. For XF
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> It should work. What version are you trying? I seem to remember Xinerama
> problems in 4.1.0 which are fixed in CVS.
I'm using thhe 4.1.0-6 debs at present. The system I'm using I haven't
even gotten around to trying to enable Xinerama - it always dies
Yeah, I recompiled my kernel with aty128fb, and everything is working fine
with the "enable video drivers" flag. Thanks for all the help!
Sincerely,
Keith
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> Keith Parkins wrote:
> >
> > That did it! Everything works okay except for when I quit X. The m
Hi,
I have a mach64 card, and I want to use the accelerated features to watch
videos. I don't want to use anything about TV and that kind of stuff, just
watch videos .avi, .mpeg, and that.
I'm not sure if mach64 supports the XVideo extension, if I should use it
only for playing videos, and how t
hi
we would like to set up a cluster here and have 10 computers
with 2 indipendent screens each, to allow two different people
to login together indipendently in each workstation:
this would be really useful, since todays PC can easily accomodate
two users, and it would save a lot of money
we h
Title: RE: [Xpert]Radeon 8500/7500 support
A patch was submitted today to XFree86 for the Radeon 8500, 7500 and Mobility Radeon 7500. This support dual-head via Xinerama.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Ani Joshi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 9:21 PM
Hi,
The Gateway 9550 is claimed to have a GeForce2 GO. It does have an SXGA
display.
I've installed XFree86 4.1.0, and the two nVidia rpms from their site.
I had to rpm -ivh --force the kernel module to get it to modprobe.
I've followed the README to the letter, although I still need to
mod
Is there support for the matrox G550 in Xfree CVS? My
G400 just died, and I replaced it with a G550. Matrox
included binary drivers and
source code that adds support for the G550 on the
install CD. I was wondering if this has been added to
your CVS. I'm using the matrox binary at the
moment, b
I have been trying for quite some time now to make XFree86 4.1.0 (and other
versions) display both on a CRT and the LCD of a Dell Latitude CPt/V with a
Mach64 chipset. But so far I have only managed to get it to display on either
one but not both at the same time.
The Xserver (XFree86 4.1.0)
Worked like a champ. I'll be writing this up (since it
wasn't a straight Red Hat install), and posting it to
linux-laptops.
Andy Ritger([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 10:42:24AM -0700:
>
> Hi Richard, I saw your post on the Xpert mailing list. Unfortunately,
> I've never seen one of t
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, hadron wrote:
> "Mark Vojkovich"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, hadron wrote:
>
> >> Except that it doesn't work, now that I was able to test it.
> >> The second head doesn't show any change in gamma even though
> >> xgamma reports the newly assigned value
On Tuesday 18 September 2001 12:18, you wrote:
>...and non-primary AGP is detected as having 2M RAM.
Hi, sorry to barge in here like this, but I have a similar situation.
I use a 3Dfx Voodoo3 on AGP, and an ATI 3D Rage PRO on PCI. the Voodoo is
primary.
I am having some serious issues setting
Hello,
My understanding is this chipset (I have an Inspiron) was better supported in
XF 3.3.6 !! The 'reasoning' appears to be that this chipset is now too old to
bother with !! This goes for 3D acceleration as well which seemed to be fully
supported in 3.3.6 !! All I can think is to try good
Quoting "Georgina O. Economou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hello all:
> >
> > I'll start with a classic: "congratulations for the great work". As
> a
> > developer of CaixaMagica, the first Portuguese Linux distribution
> I
> > would
> > like to request some informations regarding the XFree pro
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Peter Surda wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 07:52:16PM -0700, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
> > > I'd like to propose a change to Xv standard, to add a function
> > > "XvGetImage",
> > > which could be used to transfer data from videoram to system memory.
> 2
> > > possible situatio
Evan Martin wrote:
>
> Is there an input driver for Linux's generic /dev/input/eventx
> interface?
> Has someone attempted to write a driver for it? If not, is there a good
> reason I shouldn't attempt to write one? Would it belong as yet another
> modification to the (rather complicated) "mou
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 01:30:52PM -0700, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
>Then the client API would be the same as XvGetStill but would use
> an XvImage as the destination instead of a Drawable.
Er, not quite. XvGetStill seems to have a Drawable as a source and Port as a
destination. What I want is to
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Peter Surda wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 01:30:52PM -0700, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
> >Then the client API would be the same as XvGetStill but would use
> > an XvImage as the destination instead of a Drawable.
> Er, not quite. XvGetStill seems to have a Drawable as a sou
Hello all !
I can't find a list XVideo capable XFree86 drivers . The one I have was built
from xine users feedback. Can someone comment , add entries or say something
about future plans ?
This is my list:
3dfx
Voodoo3 (xfree 4.1)
Voodoo4 (xfree 4.1)
Voodoo5 (xfree 4.1)
Nvidia ( xfree 4.1 )
T
Hello all:
One thing I can't find in the documentation. Are there advantages (or
disadvantages) of using XF86_FBDev over XFree86 4.1 with fbdev driver ? Any
other relevant comments ?
Thank you very much
Gustavo Homem
---
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 02:39:06PM -0700, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
>Sorry, I meant XvPutStill.
aha.
>There will need to be an option for a shm completion event
> on XvShmGetImage so the client isn't blocked while the server
> fetches the data.
I must confess I don't know the difference betw
I was under the impression that the Matrox G100 that I'm struggling with
also supports Xv? If not, that will save me the continued anguish of
trying to get it to work :)
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Gustavo Carvalho Homem wrote:
>
>
> Hello all !
>
> I can't find a list XVideo capable XFree86 drivers .
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Bob wrote:
> I was under the impression that the Matrox G100 that I'm struggling with
> also supports Xv? If not, that will save me the continued anguish of
> trying to get it to work :)
The driver doesn't support it. Back when I wrote the Xv support
for the mga driver,
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Peter Surda wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 02:39:06PM -0700, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
> >Sorry, I meant XvPutStill.
> aha.
>
> >There will need to be an option for a shm completion event
> > on XvShmGetImage so the client isn't blocked while the server
> > fetches the
Around 16 o'clock on Sep 20, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
>XShmGetImage is blocking, so maybe it's not important for XvShmGetImage
> to be asynchronous. Having to send the event (and receive it)
> probably just increases the latency anyhow. OK, the event is
> a bad idea.
The protocol isn't bloc
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 04:27:26PM -0700, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
>XvPutImage pushes the data through the socket. With XvShmPutImage
> (only available for local clients) data is stored in shared memory
> so that the server just copies it from the client's XvImage itself.
I get it now. It seems
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Peter Surda wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 04:27:26PM -0700, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
> >XvPutImage pushes the data through the socket. With XvShmPutImage
> > (only available for local clients) data is stored in shared memory
> > so that the server just copies it from the
Aok, good to know before I beat myself any further.
Thanks
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Bob wrote:
>
> > I was under the impression that the Matrox G100 that I'm struggling with
> > also supports Xv? If not, that will save me the continued anguish of
> > tr
I have a laptop with the ATI Rage Mobility Radeon-M on a Sony VAIO
PCG-GR170K. I did an lspci and this is the ID of the card. It has 8
Megs of RAM
#define PCI_CHIP_RADEON_VE 0x4C59
I got the latest XFree86 4.1.99 by doing a CVS checkout a couple weeks
ago. I am running RedHat 7.1. X is run
With those changes, I can switch VTs or resolutions within X again (yay!),
however, on my laptop, the Xv image is still offset too far out of the
window (at either 640x480 or 800x600), and the problem with videos
>384pixels wide still happens (left side appears on right and vice versa).
It would a
34 matches
Mail list logo
