Re: [yocto] syslinux filesystem size limitation

2012-03-26 Thread Joshua Immanuel
Hello, On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 18:37 +0530, Joshua Immanuel wrote: In yocto I find that the live image (hddimg) is generated using syslinux (in bootimg.bbclass). But, I find there has been no check enforced to find whether the filesystem size exceeds 1 GB. The image will not boot if the

Re: [yocto] pseudo interaction issue

2012-03-26 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 02:43 -0500, Peter Seebach wrote: On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 17:15:15 + Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: This implies that once we enable pseudo for a child, there is some change in the parent which persists. Hmm. Is the parent running with

Re: [yocto] Request for Yocto Project 1.2 release Beta Program Users Yocto T-Shirt

2012-03-26 Thread Barros Pena, Belen
Hi Song, Just wondering how many volunteers for the Beta release you have. Do you think it would be possible to add some usability testing of Hob to the Beta programme? This would involve us contacting a few of the volunteers and asking them to do a couple of simple things with Hob while we watch

[yocto] can all of the licensing discussion be centralized in an appendix?

2012-03-26 Thread Robert P. J. Day
still clawing my way through the ref manual and it seems that there's *way* too much coverage of licensing sprinkled throughout. most people are not going to care about licensing until the time comes to maybe start distributing their BSP. as it stands, in the *development* version of the ref

[yocto] ref manual, ch 5, claims that toolchain should be installed under /opt/poky

2012-03-26 Thread Robert P. J. Day
currently, ch 5 of the reference manual claims that a generated meta-toolchain tarball should be unpacked under /opt/poky, which might be *historically* correct but i just baked a meta-toolchain and its tarball contents are all prefixed with ./usr/local/, which seems inconsistent with that.

[yocto] numerous poky references now need to be deleted from docs

2012-03-26 Thread Robert P. J. Day
could have mentioned this in my previous post, but there are numerous uses of the phrase poky in, for instance, the yocto reference manual that need to be scrapped. as one example, toolchains that used to be untarred under /opt/poky now appear to belong (more reasonably) under /usr/local.

[yocto] Support of meta-kde for Poky

2012-03-26 Thread Samuel Stirtzel
Hi, the development of meta-kde has come to a point where kde-applications can be tested (and maybe used). Status of meta-kde: Most common applications work, for example: Calligra (not all of the toolkit), Kate, KCalc, Konqueror, Kwin Kwin_gles (KDE window manager), Okular and the applications

Re: [yocto] Support of meta-kde for Poky

2012-03-26 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 26 mrt. 2012, om 07:55 heeft Samuel Stirtzel het volgende geschreven: Hi, the development of meta-kde has come to a point where kde-applications can be tested (and maybe used). Status of meta-kde: Most common applications work, for example: Calligra (not all of the toolkit), Kate,

Re: [yocto] Support of meta-kde for Poky

2012-03-26 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Monday 26 March 2012 14:55:40 Samuel Stirtzel wrote: the development of meta-kde has come to a point where kde-applications can be tested (and maybe used). Status of meta-kde: Most common applications work, for example: Calligra (not all of the toolkit), Kate, KCalc, Konqueror, Kwin

Re: [yocto] Support of meta-kde for Poky

2012-03-26 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Monday 26 March 2012 14:19:56 Paul Eggleton wrote: On Monday 26 March 2012 14:55:40 Samuel Stirtzel wrote: meta-kde has no mailing list, so I'm looking for a list to host the discussion, any suggestions? Probably just the oe-devel list - if the volume of commits gets too high Er, that

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1] [linux-yocto-3.2][meta] common-pc: Add PCNET32 to the config

2012-03-26 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12-03-23 05:52 PM, Darren Hart wrote: In support of the self-hosted-image, add CONFIG_PCNET32 to the common-pc BSP default cfg. This enables the qemux86 image to be run on both qemux86 machines as well as the vmware 32b machine. Since the qemux86 machine optionally supports pcnet, this seems

Re: [yocto] can all of the licensing discussion be centralized in an appendix?

2012-03-26 Thread Rifenbark, Scott M
Is BSP licensing different than non-BSP licensing? If not, then licensing could be combined into a single section. Can someone answer this for me? Also, good point on the BSP guide appearing as a chapter in the reference manual. I have not liked this. Is there any rational reason to have it

Re: [yocto] meta-x32: disagreement between ref manual and README.TXT

2012-03-26 Thread Rifenbark, Scott M
Typo fixed. Nitin needs to respond on the apparent core inconsistency. Scott -Original Message- From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Robert P. J. Day Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2012 10:17 AM To: Yocto discussion list Subject: [yocto]

Re: [yocto] can all of the licensing discussion be centralized in an appendix?

2012-03-26 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 14:26 +, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote: Is BSP licensing different than non-BSP licensing? If not, then licensing could be combined into a single section. Can someone answer this for me? The focus of those sections are different and should probably be in separate

Re: [yocto] meta-x32: disagreement between ref manual and README.TXT

2012-03-26 Thread Kamble, Nitin A
-Original Message- From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto- boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Robert P. J. Day Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2012 9:17 AM To: Yocto discussion list Subject: [yocto] meta-x32: disagreement between ref manual and README.TXT poky ref

Re: [yocto] pseudo interaction issue

2012-03-26 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 11:44 -0500, Peter Seebach wrote: On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 17:41:43 + Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: One or the other of the above on their own doesn't do this. Funky. That's very strange. I wouldn't have expected LOCALSTATEDIR to have any

[yocto] Yocto Beta Testing (Yocto 1.2)

2012-03-26 Thread Murugayah, Kanapathy
Hi All, Experience survey of Using Yocto 1.2 Q: Which architecture did you choose to build? A: qemu x86 (minimal) atom-pc (minimal) Q: How easily were you able to build an image and boot an image? A: Reasonably easy to create and boot up an image the as-is way(terminal). Q: Is there any

[yocto] Unable to find recipe for glibc-2.11.1

2012-03-26 Thread Navani Srivastava
Hi, I am looking for recipe of glibc-2.11.1 version. I googled for it but no success. Can anyone please suggest me the link from where i can download the same? Thanks and Regards Navani Kamal Srivastava ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org

Re: [yocto] pseudo interaction issue

2012-03-26 Thread Peter Seebach
On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:47:29 +0100 Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: This is pretty much what we do at the moment, it gets unset after we load. Pseudo is of course disabled at this point. I guess we just got lucky to this point and avoided Bad Things? I suspect so.

Re: [yocto] tentative list of vars to be dropped from variable glossary

2012-03-26 Thread Rudolf Streif
Another variable that seems to be dropped from the latest 1.1.1 revision of the Reference Manual is BBMASK. In previous versions of the manual it was explained that this variable can be used to remove packages from images. However, that did not work for me and it did not surprise me either. To

Re: [yocto] pseudo interaction issue

2012-03-26 Thread Peter Seebach
On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 17:15:15 + Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: What puzzles me is we get this value from envbackup[key] = os.environ.get(PSEUDO_PREFIX) so its already not in the environment. So basically if we read PSEUDO_PREFIX from the environment we get

Re: [yocto] pseudo interaction issue

2012-03-26 Thread Peter Seebach
Oh, nevermind, I just realized: We use antimagic as the implementation goo for PSEUDO_DISABLED. So a call to os.popen() from a program which has PSEUDO_DISABLED set is going to think it's in antimagic mode. And suddenly, the trick is revealed: os.popen() is bypassing all the runqueue stuff

Re: [yocto] can all of the licensing discussion be centralized in an appendix?

2012-03-26 Thread Rudolf Streif
there's *way* too much coverage of licensing sprinkled throughout. most people are not going to care about licensing until the time comes to maybe start distributing their BSP. The ability of collecting licensing information, tracking license changes and providing the license information

Re: [yocto] can all of the licensing discussion be centralized in an appendix?

2012-03-26 Thread Rifenbark, Scott M
Rudi, I would like you to examine the latest documents (the ones under development). I have added some new licensing information and would like your feedback for this upcoming version. There are licensing discussions in both the latest versions of the BSP Guide and the reference manual.

[yocto] [PATCH 1/2] initrdscripts: fix init-live.sh and use unionfs

2012-03-26 Thread Yang Shi
[YOCTO #1487] Use unionfs to mount rootfs and make root file system can be writen when using liveCD to boot up. Set UNION_FS variable depending on kenrel config, so that it can work with kernel which doesn't have unionfs feature. Signed-off-by: Yang Shi yang@windriver.com ---

[yocto] [PATCH 2/2] sato: Remove questioned ISO image

2012-03-26 Thread Yang Shi
[YOCTO #1487] For the liveCD image, interactive bootup is needed, but psplash prevents from booting interactively. In such case ISO image is not usable, so remove ISO image and the corresponding link and throw error info to warn outside to enable unionfs in kenrel. Signed-off-by: Yang Shi

[yocto] [PATCH 0/2] Fix init-live.sh to use unionfs for live CD and remove questioned ISO image

2012-03-26 Thread Yang Shi
Use unionfs to mount rootfs and make root file system can be writen when using liveCD to boot up. Set UNION_FS variable depending on kenrel config, so that it can work with kernel which doesn't have unionfs feature. Without UNION FS enabled in kernel, minimal liveCD image can be bootup to

Re: [yocto] pseudo interaction issue

2012-03-26 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 12:18 -0500, Peter Seebach wrote: On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:47:29 +0100 Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: This is pretty much what we do at the moment, it gets unset after we load. Pseudo is of course disabled at this point. I guess we just

[yocto] [PATCH 00/14][meta-intel] Cover letter for updating meta-cedartrail BSP with PVR Graphics driver

2012-03-26 Thread rahul . saxena
From: Rahul Saxena rahul.sax...@intel.com Cover letter for updating the Cedar Trail BSP (meta-cedartrail) with PVR Graphics driver. This patch set updates meta-cedartrail (edison branch) to include Power VR driver for Graphics and Video hardware acceleration. The patches enable BSP build with

[yocto] [PATCH 01/14] meta-cedartrail: Separate conf files for the Cedar Trail BSP boot cases of with and without pvr driver

2012-03-26 Thread rahul . saxena
From: Rahul Saxena rahul.sax...@intel.com Seperate Cedar Trail machine configuration files, one file each for build with pvr graphics driver and without pvr driver (with VESA driver) The Cedar Trail platform is based on the Cedarview processor (Intel® Atom™ N2600, N2800 and D2700 processor)and

[yocto] [PATCH 02/14] meta-cedartrail: update BBFILES to include meta-intel/common path

2012-03-26 Thread rahul . saxena
From: Rahul Saxena rahul.sax...@intel.com Update BBFILES to include the path to xserver-xf86-dri-lite_1.9.3.bb Cedar Trail PVR driver is dependent on Version 1.9.3 of xserver. Signed-off-by: Rahul Saxena rahul.sax...@.intel.com --- meta-cedartrail/conf/layer.conf |4 +++- 1 files changed, 3

[yocto] [PATCH 03/14] meta-cedartrail: update README with instructions for PVR Graphics driver build

2012-03-26 Thread rahul . saxena
From: Rahul Saxena rahul.sax...@intel.com Update README file with information on building image with PVR graphics driver. Also provide info on enabling build of recipes for glxgears demo apps, video and music samples. Signed-off-by: Rahul Saxena rahul.sax...@.intel.com ---

[yocto] [PATCH 04/14] meta-cedatrail: add recipe for setting audio mixer settings during boot

2012-03-26 Thread rahul . saxena
From: Rahul Saxena rahul.sax...@intel.com Recipe is copied from n450-audio.bb with a few parameters changed to adjust volume settings for Front mixer during boot. Signed-off-by: Rahul Saxena rahul.sax...@.intel.com --- .../cedartrail-audio/cedartrail-audio.bb | 30 ++

[yocto] [PATCH 05/14] meta-cedartrail: seperate xorg.conf files for pvr and no-pvr cases

2012-03-26 Thread rahul . saxena
From: Rahul Saxena rahul.sax...@intel.com Seperate xserver configuration files, one file each for the case of with pvr graphics driver and for no pvr (i.e. with VESA driver) Signed-off-by: Rahul Saxena rahul.sax...@.intel.com --- .../xserver-xf86-config/cedartrail-nopvr/xorg.conf | 26

[yocto] [PATCH 07/14] meta-cedartrail: update Kernel recipes to add support for pvr driver

2012-03-26 Thread rahul . saxena
From: Rahul Saxena rahul.sax...@intel.com Modify kernel recipes to enable pvr kernel patches and to include additional Kernel config files for pvr driver Signed-off-by: Rahul Saxena rahul.sax...@.intel.com --- .../linux/linux-yocto-rt_3.0.bbappend | 13 -

[yocto] [PATCH 08/14] meta-cedartrail: add libva recipe

2012-03-26 Thread rahul . saxena
From: Rahul Saxena rahul.sax...@intel.com The libva recipe is based on libva recipe published by Tom Zanussi in meta-intel/common area in the 1.2_Mx branches. The main difference is that this recipe sources the packages from the Cedar Trail section of the MeeGo download website. Signed-off-by:

[yocto] [PATCH 09/14] meta-cedartrail: add recipes to instal audio and video samples

2012-03-26 Thread rahul . saxena
From: Rahul Saxena rahul.sax...@intel.com Install Ogg format audio and video sample files Signed-off-by: Rahul Saxena rahul.sax...@.intel.com --- .../ogg-CC-BY-3.0-music-samples_0.1.bb | 20 .../video-samples/bigbuckbunny-ogg.bb | 20

[yocto] [PATCH 10/14] meta-cedartrail: update formfactor recipe for pvr and no-pvr case

2012-03-26 Thread rahul . saxena
From: Rahul Saxena rahul.sax...@intel.com Seperate machconfig files for pvr and no-pvr case Signed-off-by: Rahul Saxena rahul.sax...@.intel.com --- .../formfactor/cedartrail-nopvr/machconfig |3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644

[yocto] [PATCH 11/14] meta-cedartrail: Add web-webkit, audio and video samples to sato image

2012-03-26 Thread rahul . saxena
From: Rahul Saxena rahul.sax...@intel.com Update sato images to include web-webkit and audio video samples Signed-off-by: Rahul Saxena rahul.sax...@.intel.com --- .../images/core-image-sato-dev.bbappend|3 +++ .../images/core-image-sato-sdk.bbappend|3 +++

[yocto] [PATCH 12/14] meta-cedartrail: Update SRC_URI in kernel recipe append files to point to linux-yocto_3.0

2012-03-26 Thread rahul . saxena
From: Rahul Saxena rahul.sax...@intel.com Current poky/edison points to linux-yocto-3.0-1.1.x.git repo. However this repo does not have cedartrail branch. Hence point to linux-yocto_3.0 via kernel recipe append files Signed-off-by: Rahul Saxena rahul.sax...@.intel.com ---

[yocto] [PATCH 13/14] meta-cedartrail: update SRC_REV_meta for no-pvr case

2012-03-26 Thread rahul . saxena
From: Rahul Saxena rahul.sax...@intel.com SRC_REV_meta for no-pvr case updated to be same as that used for pvr build Signed-off-by: Rahul Saxena rahul.sax...@.intel.com --- .../recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.0.bbappend |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git

[yocto] [PATCH 14/14] meta-cedartrail: change libva license to MIT

2012-03-26 Thread rahul . saxena
From: Rahul Saxena rahul.sax...@intel.com The license type in libva recipe was incorrect. Changed it to MIT Signed-off-by: Rahul Saxena rahul.sax...@.intel.com --- .../recipes-multimedia/libva/libva_1.0.15.bb |6 +++--- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git

[yocto] [PATCH 06/14] meta-cedartrail: add Cedar Trail PVR driver

2012-03-26 Thread rahul . saxena
From: Rahul Saxena rahul.sax...@intel.com The Cedar Trail PVR driver consists of user-space binaries that enable the Video and Graphics acceleration capabilites of the Power VR SGX545 Integrated Graphics Controller in the Cedarview processor. The driver binaries are provided under Intel Free

Re: [yocto] can all of the licensing discussion be centralized in an appendix?

2012-03-26 Thread Rudolf Streif
Scott, ** http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/poky-ref-manual/poky-ref-manual.html . ** ** Yes, I looked at that one but I now noticed that I referenced it incorrectly. This is the latest version, however, in the revision history it shows Revision 1.1, October 6, 2011, Released

Re: [yocto] can all of the licensing discussion be centralized in an appendix?

2012-03-26 Thread Rifenbark, Scott M
Rudi, Great comments! Thanks very much. I will immediately update the revision history tables to show the 1.2 release as WIP. Not having it there did cause you confusion. Good suggestion. Regarding your other observations. If you have the time I would appreciate you looking at the YP

Re: [yocto] tentative list of vars to be dropped from variable glossary

2012-03-26 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 12:42 -0700, Rudolf Streif wrote: Another variable that seems to be dropped from the latest 1.1.1 revision of the Reference Manual is BBMASK. In previous versions of the manual it was explained that this variable can be used to remove packages from images. However, that

Re: [yocto] tentative list of vars to be dropped from variable glossary

2012-03-26 Thread Rudolf Streif
Thanks, Richard. Clearer now but not entirely. BBMASK removes recipes from being parsed. It does not remove them from images although that would I guess be an indirect result since you could no longer build them. Yes, it removes it from being parsed. I used, for test although not

[yocto] who are using archlinux?

2012-03-26 Thread Ni Qingliang
who are using archlinux? I want to talk about gconf compile fail problem. -- Yi Qingliang niqingli...@insigma.com.cn https://niqingliang2003.wordpress.com ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] pseudo interaction issue

2012-03-26 Thread Peter Seebach
On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 22:45:16 +0100 Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: I'm still a little surprised we don't make any system() calls though. I just tried putting a os.system(true) call into the breakit class and it doesn't trigger the warnings. Could that be down to the