Hi,
I want to build a basic image for the Avionic Tamonten board using Yocto.
SO, I created a skidata-tamonten.conf in the list of machines based on the
beagleboard.conf but I dont know what to add for the UBOOT_MACHINE= . I
tried my best to use the same omap_beagle_conf but it doesnot boot
Am 10.02.2013 18:55, schrieb Andrei Gherzan:
WARNING: QA Issue: [...]/rpi-first-run-wizard.bb:
Variable RDEPENDS is set as not being package specific, please fix this.
Signed-off-by: Andrei Gherzan and...@gherzan.ro
---
recipes-extra/startup/rpi-first-run-wizard.bb |4 ++--
1 file
Hi Andrei,
I applied and tested all 7 patches and they work as the binary firmware
did before. Maybe in a later patch a pkgconfig file can be added (I
think it was there before, but I'm not using it yet, so I'm not really
sure).
I don't like the name userland (it's not really describing
Hello,
Here is a real-time status report for the current weekly build. We are working
towards implementing an automated reporting system and this is what we have so
far.
We analyzed the previous report style and all the information, in one form or
another, is contained in this report as well
Hello,
Here is a real-time status report for the current weekly build:
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/1.4_QA_Status
We are working towards implementing an automated reporting system and this is
what we have so far.
We analyzed the previous report style and all the information, in one form
Unfortunately tec_config didnot work. Here is the error message
Log data follows:
| DEBUG: Executing shell function do_compile
| NOTE: make -j 8 CROSS_COMPILE=arm-poky-linux-gnueabi-
CC=arm-poky-linux-gnueabi-gcc
--sysroot=/home/build/yocto/poky/buildTamonten/tmp/sysroots/skidata-tamonten
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 05:31 -0500, Trevor Woerner wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 12:31 AM, Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
So when you say it doesn't work, you mean the module autoload didn't
work, but everything else did?
Yes, exactly.
Did you do the 'bump the PR' step after
On 2013-02-19 09:02, Satya Swaroop Damarla wrote:
Unfortunately tec_config didnot work. Here is the error message
I think you need a newer U-Boot to get the support for this board.
Try
PREFERRED_VERSION_u-boot ?= v2012.10%
or even
PREFERRED_VERSION_u-boot ?= v2013.01%
Log data follows:
|
I am not sure what “hob” layer does and how to build with any BSP.
May be someone from the mailing list would help you here.
How to build any meta-intel BSP with “meta-hob” layer?
Just include this layer in bblayers.conf? or any other changes required?
Thanks
Kishore.
From: 万欣宇
Hi,
I've noticed a problem in rootfs_ipk.bbclass as status files are always removed
in case of using IPK (works fine with
RPM). Here is the small patch which fix it.
regards
diff --git a/meta/classes/rootfs_ipk.bbclass b/meta/classes/rootfs_ipk.bbclass
index fadec4d..89c3128 100644
---
First of all, I am a total noob when it comes to bitbake, but I am
struggling and slowly getting there ( I think).
So, I am sorry if my questions seems stupid, but this one I just can
not seem to figure out on my own.
What I am trying to do is to build a custom ARM based rootfs image
using the
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 08:14:22PM +0100, Pierre Ficheux wrote:
Hi,
I've noticed a problem in rootfs_ipk.bbclass as status files are always
removed in case of using IPK (works fine with
RPM). Here is the small patch which fix it.
This is expected, see if in which this is:
if
Following up on a hunch, after reading Pierre Ficheux's email from
earlier today, I realized that by default I always switch my build's
PACKAGE_CLASSES to ipk simply because this packaging takes the least
amount of build time. Sure enough, when working on lab3 I had switched
to ipk and it didn't
All,
I'm currently at ELC and am going to be a little slow with email.
However, tonight I will be building M4 rc1. We are looking pretty
green and had been hoping to use the last build for rc1, but we want
to get it a little closer as to have it all green. I will be building
it from current
On (09/01/13 16:59), Edward Vidal wrote:
Hello,
I was testing the example 4.1 Autotools-Based Projects
should the file configure.in be configure.ac
this is the error that I get when I execute aclocal
aclocal
aclocal: warning: autoconf input should be named 'configure.ac', not '
Yes, better with
IMAGE_FEATURES += package-management
sorry.
- Mail original -
De: Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com
À: Pierre Ficheux pierre.fich...@openwide.fr
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Envoyé: Mardi 19 Février 2013 23:06:11
Objet: Re: [yocto] Always removing status files in
Is there a kernel-devicetree package in you tmp/deploy ?
I'm using ipk and I have:
tmp/deploy/ipk/syrcxx/kernel-devicetree_2.6.38-r4_syrcxx.ipk
If it is not there that is your problem.
You may also want to nuke your tmp dir and rebuild (with sstate it should
not take excessively long)
Frans
Attendees:
AlexD, Cidy, Nitin, PaulE, KevinS, Belen, BjörnS, Amit, Corneliu, Song
Notes:
Song: many of our team members are at ELC this week. They may not be able to
attend this meeting.
* Opens collection - 5 min (Song)
* Yocto Project 1.3.1 status - 10 min (Ross)
- The build is ready,
18 matches
Mail list logo
