[yocto] [meta-security][PATCH V2] xmlsec1: add PACKAGECONFIG disable-des

From: Changqing Li Signed-off-by: Changqing Li --- recipes-security/xmlsec1/xmlsec1_1.2.27.bb | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/recipes-security/xmlsec1/xmlsec1_1.2.27.bb b/recipes-security/xmlsec1/xmlsec1_1.2.27.bb index 0cd06c5..eac8d6b 100644 ---

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 11:59:42PM +, Burton, Ross wrote: > On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 23:55, Tom Rini wrote: > > My current incomplete list is: > > bind-utils \ > > bridge-utils \ > > coreutils \ > > dnsmasq \ > > e2fsprogs \ > > e2fsprogs-resize2fs \ > >

[linux-yocto] [kernel-cache][RFC 1/3] qemuarma15: Undo the revert of qemuarm match

This reverts commit 7223248023d3d822c8c0227fb65d995ba6b7a351. --- bsp/qemuarma15/qemuarma15-preempt-rt.scc | 1 + bsp/qemuarma15/qemuarma15-standard.scc | 1 + bsp/qemuarma15/qemuarma15-tiny.scc | 1 + 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/bsp/qemuarma15/qemuarma15-preempt-rt.scc

[linux-yocto] [kernel-cache][RFC 3/3] qemuarm64: Add graphics support

Signed-off-by: Jon Mason --- bsp/qemuarm64/qemuarm64-gfx.cfg | 7 +++ bsp/qemuarm64/qemuarm64.scc | 1 + 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+) create mode 100644 bsp/qemuarm64/qemuarm64-gfx.cfg diff --git a/bsp/qemuarm64/qemuarm64-gfx.cfg b/bsp/qemuarm64/qemuarm64-gfx.cfg new file mode

[linux-yocto] [kernel-cache][RFC 2/3] qemuarma15: Add graphics support

Signed-off-by: Jon Mason --- bsp/qemuarma15/qemuarma15-gfx.cfg | 7 +++ bsp/qemuarma15/qemuarma15.cfg | 3 +++ bsp/qemuarma15/qemuarma15.scc | 1 + 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+) create mode 100644 bsp/qemuarma15/qemuarma15-gfx.cfg diff --git a/bsp/qemuarma15/qemuarma15-gfx.cfg

[linux-yocto] [kernel-cache][RFC 0/3] qemuarm|qemuarm64: graphics support

This series reverts the reversion of qemuarm match for qemuarma15, and adds graphics support for both qemuarm and qemuarm64. I'm sending this out as an RFC as there are some issues with the implementation, and this should probably only be included if the forthcoming patches for

[yocto] SRC_URI when there is a local mirror but no remote repo

Hi, Does Yocto/Bitbake support a way to set SRC_URI in a recipe when there is no corresponding upstream remote (git://, https://, etc.) for a *.tar.gz file? IOW, I've configured for own_mirrors and set BB_NO_NETWORK=1, and my *.tar.gz file only lives in the local_mirror directory. It looks

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache][PATCH 0/5] Some kernel configs have been deprecated or changed.

On 02/27/2019 10:17 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 4:32 AM Hongzhi.Song wrote: Please merge to master and yocto-4.19. This serial of patches have been merged by yocto-4.18. [Begin with:

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 at 00:10, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote: > My image recipe look actually like below and require several > meta-openembedded/meta-*. This is not a clean example. The > packagegroup-core-full-cmdline already provides a chunk of commands but > more are required to look like a

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

Le 28.02.19 à 00:59, Burton, Ross a écrit : > On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 23:55, Tom Rini wrote: >> My current incomplete list is: >> bind-utils \ >> bridge-utils \ >> coreutils \ >> dnsmasq \ >> e2fsprogs \ >> e2fsprogs-resize2fs \ >> e2fsprogs-tune2fs \ >> findutils \

[yocto] Quick start example error

Hi, I'm new to this mailing list and I have never used Yocto before. I'm trying to build my first image by following the quick start guide but I keep getting this error while running "bitbake

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 23:55, Tom Rini wrote: > My current incomplete list is: > bind-utils \ > bridge-utils \ > coreutils \ > dnsmasq \ > e2fsprogs \ > e2fsprogs-resize2fs \ > e2fsprogs-tune2fs \ > findutils \ > gawk \ > grep \ > inetutils-ping \ >

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 11:02:06PM +, Burton, Ross wrote: > On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 22:25, Jean-Christian de Rivaz > wrote: > > The project I work for need nodejs and chromium (and a >100MB database > > on some nodes), so space is not an issue. I need to deliver an useful > > distribution with

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 22:25, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote: > The project I work for need nodejs and chromium (and a >100MB database > on some nodes), so space is not an issue. I need to deliver an useful > distribution with usual commands, tools and a working console + keyboard > for my locale.

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

On 02/27/2019 05:24 PM, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote: > Le 27.02.19 à 22:40, Adrian Bunk a écrit : >> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 03:09:02PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 09:06:38PM +0100, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote: >>> ... So as expected systemd is there and busybox is

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

Le 27.02.19 à 22:40, Adrian Bunk a écrit : > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 03:09:02PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 09:06:38PM +0100, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote: >> ... >>> So as expected systemd is there and busybox is not. But there is a lot of >>> useful commands missing on the

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 21:41, Adrian Bunk wrote: > It is not obvious to me what usecases people have in mind for > getting rid of busybox, and whether everyone is aware that > something like "all busybox commands replaced" is *very* > expensive regarding filesystem size. Considering many of the

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 11:40:37PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 03:09:02PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 09:06:38PM +0100, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote: > >... > > > So as expected systemd is there and busybox is not. But there is a lot of > > > useful

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 03:09:02PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 09:06:38PM +0100, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote: >... > > So as expected systemd is there and busybox is not. But there is a lot of > > useful commands missing on the resulting QEMU image: > > > > root@qemux86:~#

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:31:15AM +1300, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Thursday, 28 February 2019 9:09:02 AM NZDT Tom Rini wrote: > > Somewhere on my (and other > > folks too) TODO list is a packagegroup that includes procps and psmisc > > and grep and tar and various network packages and less and

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

On Thursday, 28 February 2019 9:09:02 AM NZDT Tom Rini wrote: > Somewhere on my (and other > folks too) TODO list is a packagegroup that includes procps and psmisc > and grep and tar and various network packages and less and more and... That is what packagegroup-core-full-cmdline (well, the

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Information about non-traditional uses of the Yocto Project and OpenEmbedded

Sounds like good potential for a section or chapter in the user docs. Scott On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 12:01 PM Philip Balister wrote: > During the last OpenEmbedded developer meeting, it became clear that > people are using the Yocto project/OpenEmbedded in spaces outside what > we think of as

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 09:06:38PM +0100, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote: > Thank you very much Tom for help. Here is my complete method: > > git clone git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky -b thud > cd poky > cat << EOF > meta-poky/conf/distro/poky-ng.conf > require conf/distro/poky.conf > DISTRO =

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

Thank you very much Tom for help. Here is my complete method: git clone git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky -b thud cd poky cat << EOF > meta-poky/conf/distro/poky-ng.conf require conf/distro/poky.conf DISTRO = "poky-ng" # Switch to systemd DISTRO_FEATURES += "systemd" VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_init_manager =

[yocto] Information about non-traditional uses of the Yocto Project and OpenEmbedded

During the last OpenEmbedded developer meeting, it became clear that people are using the Yocto project/OpenEmbedded in spaces outside what we think of as traditional embedded. Lieu Ta is working on a presentation for the Linux Foundation Leadership Summit and we would like to collect as many

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 06:47:52PM +, Burton, Ross wrote: > On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 18:45, Tom Rini wrote: > > OK, so I've kicked things a bit harder again, and here's what I see as > > the (small) rub. > > $ git grep hddimg meta/conf/ > > meta/conf/machine/include/x86-base.inc:IMAGE_FSTYPES

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

Hi, Sounds like this issue might have some documentation ripples when it settles out. Scott On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:46 AM Tom Rini wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 06:35:10PM +, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 17:58, Tom Rini wrote: > > > I'm not sure we can blacklist

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 18:45, Tom Rini wrote: > OK, so I've kicked things a bit harder again, and here's what I see as > the (small) rub. > $ git grep hddimg meta/conf/ > meta/conf/machine/include/x86-base.inc:IMAGE_FSTYPES ?= "hddimg" > > So yes, we can do a test with qemux86/qemux86-64 and

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 06:35:10PM +, Burton, Ross wrote: > On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 17:58, Tom Rini wrote: > > I'm not sure we can blacklist busybox from the build at this time > > (hddimg requires initramfs that requires busybox) but instead only force > > remove it from the image and ensure

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 17:58, Tom Rini wrote: > I'm not sure we can blacklist busybox from the build at this time > (hddimg requires initramfs that requires busybox) but instead only force > remove it from the image and ensure it still builds. Don't build an image with a initramfs? --

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 05:42:03PM +, Burton, Ross wrote: > On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 17:27, Mark Hatle wrote: > > You can also blacklist busybox to ensure that it never builds, and thus > > can't > > show up in your target image. > > > > PNBLACKLIST[busybox] = "Don't build this" > > Sounds

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 17:27, Mark Hatle wrote: > You can also blacklist busybox to ensure that it never builds, and thus can't > show up in your target image. > > PNBLACKLIST[busybox] = "Don't build this" Sounds like someone should write a new selftest that does the required configuration

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

On 2/27/19 11:06 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 01:16:56PM +0100, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> After reading the thread "Removing busybox completely from the generated >> image" I tested to reproduce the method but this doesn't work as expected. >> >> git clone

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 01:16:56PM +0100, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote: > Hi all, > > After reading the thread "Removing busybox completely from the generated > image" I tested to reproduce the method but this doesn't work as expected. > > git clone git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky -b thud > cd

Re: [yocto] [meta-security][PATCH] xmlsec1: add PACKAGECONFIG disable-des

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 04:38:10PM +0800, changqing...@windriver.com wrote: > From: Changqing Li > > Signed-off-by: Changqing Li > --- > recipes-security/xmlsec1/xmlsec1_1.2.27.bb | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/recipes-security/xmlsec1/xmlsec1_1.2.27.bb >

Re: [yocto] alsa utility

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 4:49 AM Bhupendra Singh wrote: > > Hi all > > How can i add alsa utility in poky core-minimal-imege. > https://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.6.1/ref-manual/ref-manual.html#var-IMAGE_INSTALL > > > Thanks & Regards > > Bhupendra Singh > > > > -- >

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH 1/3] features: Add the drm-bochs feature

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 9:18 AM Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > Hi Allistair, > > Which kernel versions were you using for these ? I was thinking 4.19 > and master, and have put them there. Let me know if you'd like to see > them on other versinos as well. > I take that back, they didn't apply cleanly

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH 1/3] features: Add the drm-bochs feature

Hi Allistair, Which kernel versions were you using for these ? I was thinking 4.19 and master, and have put them there. Let me know if you'd like to see them on other versinos as well. Bruce On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 4:42 PM Alistair Francis wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis > --- >

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache][PATCH 0/5] Some kernel configs have been deprecated or changed.

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 4:32 AM Hongzhi.Song wrote: > > Please merge to master and yocto-4.19. > > This serial of patches have been merged by yocto-4.18. > [Begin with: > http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/yocto-kernel-cache/commit/?h=yocto-4.18=856794172e8f046e7d6542e09d431c5a412a8a45] >

[yocto] alsa utility

Hi all How can i add alsa utility in poky core-minimal-imege. Thanks & Regards Bhupendra Singh -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

[yocto] Removing busybox

Hi all, After reading the thread "Removing busybox completely from the generated image" I tested to reproduce the method but this doesn't work as expected. git clone git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky -b thud cd poky echo 'require conf/distro/poky.conf' > meta-poky/conf/distro/poky-ng.conf echo

[linux-yocto] [PATCH 2/5] bsp/intel-x86: Drop configs that has been removed by kernel

List the config and the commit id from kernel: CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS, commit id: 7919010c422 CONFIG_EDAC_MM_EDAC, commit id: e3c4ff6d8c9 CONFIG_I7300_IDLE, commit id: b65ce83f2a CONFIG_CRYPTO_ZLIB, commit id: 110492183c4 CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME was switched to CONFIG_PM, commit id: 464ed18ebd

[linux-yocto] [kernel-cache][PATCH 0/5] Some kernel configs have been deprecated or changed.

Please merge to master and yocto-4.19. This serial of patches have been merged by yocto-4.18. [Begin with: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/yocto-kernel-cache/commit/?h=yocto-4.18=856794172e8f046e7d6542e09d431c5a412a8a45] I remake them and delete out-date patches for yocto-4.19 and

[linux-yocto] [PATCH 3/5] features/hostapd: drop obsolete configs

CONFIG_WIRELESS_EXT_SYSFS has been removed by kernel. Commit id: 35b2a113cb. Signed-off-by: Hongzhi.Song --- features/hostapd/hostapd.cfg | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/features/hostapd/hostapd.cfg b/features/hostapd/hostapd.cfg index 16c601e..d1ec38c 100644 ---

[linux-yocto] [kernel-cache][PATCH 0/5] Some kernel configs have been deprecated or changed.

Please merge to master and yocto-4.19. This serial of patches have been merged by yocto-4.18. [Begin with: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/yocto-kernel-cache/commit/?h=yocto-4.18=856794172e8f046e7d6542e09d431c5a412a8a45] I remake them and delete out-date patches for yocto-4.19 and

[linux-yocto] [PATCH 5/5] bsp/intel-x86: Rename CONFIG_R8723BE to CONFIG_RTL8723BE

CONFIG_R8723BE was written wrongly. CONFIG_RTL8723BE is right. Signed-off-by: Hongzhi.Song --- bsp/intel-x86/intel-x86.cfg | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/bsp/intel-x86/intel-x86.cfg b/bsp/intel-x86/intel-x86.cfg index 7d7c2f6..dff54fe 100644 ---

[linux-yocto] [PATCH 4/5] features: drop the obsolete kernel option

CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_BOUNCE has been removed by kernel. Commit id: de3ee99b097d. Signed-off-by: Hongzhi.Song --- features/mmc/mmc-block.cfg | 1 - features/soc/x1000/x1000.cfg | 1 - 2 files changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/features/mmc/mmc-block.cfg b/features/mmc/mmc-block.cfg index

[linux-yocto] [PATCH 1/5] intel-x86: Drop configs which are not defined in kernel

The following configs were introduced from SDK, not defined by kernel. So we should drop them. CONFIG_X86_INTEL_SBI_APL CONFIG_SUPPORT_HDMI CONFIG_INTEL_PMIC_THERMAL CONFIG_PINCTRL_BAYTRAIL_DEVICE CONFIG_X86_INTEL_APLI_LHCRB_AIC3107 CONFIG_X86_INTEL_APLI_LHCRB_WM8731 CONFIG_BYT_LPSS_BRD

[yocto] [meta-security][PATCH] xmlsec1: add PACKAGECONFIG disable-des

From: Changqing Li Signed-off-by: Changqing Li --- recipes-security/xmlsec1/xmlsec1_1.2.27.bb | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/recipes-security/xmlsec1/xmlsec1_1.2.27.bb b/recipes-security/xmlsec1/xmlsec1_1.2.27.bb index 0cd06c5..76e3976 100644 ---