Hello Guys,
Thanks for your replies that all worked great. :-)
I have one more question with some different topic:
I have PUB/SUB system with a zmq FORWARDER device, and there all clients have
the capability of sending and receiving , so what is happening, that whenever a
single client
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 5:06 AM, Colin Johnsun colin.a...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with all previous posters, +1 on 2.2. Semver is easy to
understand. You could refactor the code as much as you want but if it
doesn't change the ABI then it is should only be 2.x.x release.
OK, we have
Hi all,
I've deleted the zeromq/zeromq2-2 and zeromq/zeromq3-0 repositories,
which are no longer used or needed.
-Pieter
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
For 3.1.x release:
More tests and info about ZMQ_ROUTER to ZMQ_ROUTER bug LIBZMQ-304.
https://zeromq.jira.com/browse/LIBZMQ-304
ZMQ_ROUTER to ZMQ_ROUTER does not work for first sent messages.
Hello.
Good news, Martin Hurton fixed this bug. Everybody who has had problems with
3.x and
Hi all,
We're pleased to announce the release of ZeroMQ/2.2.0 (stable).
Get the software from the usual place:
http://www.zeromq.org/intro:get-the-software
Thanks to everyone who provided patches and changes for this release.
-Pieter Hintjens
0MQ version 2.2.0 (Stable), released on
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Pasi Mankinen
mailing.l...@manageapp.com wrote:
Good news, Martin Hurton fixed this bug. Everybody who has had problems with
3.x and ROUTER sockets should test their code again.
Nice :-)
-Pieter
___
zeromq-dev
Pieter,
Has the Java binding for 0MQ 2.2.0 changed? And if so, what's the best
way
to acquire it?
Maybe it's just me, but I feel like there's a disconnect between the 0MQ
library download and the supported bindings. It's unclear which version
of
I submitted a push request for the timeouts to the JZMQ repo and it was pulled
(today). We should probably recommend doing another release of the Java
bindings to be able to take advantage of the new libzmq 2.x feature.
Joshua
On Apr 4, 2012, at 9:39 AM, William Brown wrote:
Pieter,
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 2:39 PM, William Brown
william.br...@ericsson.com wrote:
Maybe it's just me, but I feel like there's a disconnect between the
0MQ
library download and the supported bindings. It's unclear which
version of
the bindings (and how to download
Pieter,
Ok, I didn't understand that there is a separate group responsible for
the bindings.
Joshua responded on another e-mail that he has submitted a push request
to add support
for the 2.2 features in the latest version of the Java bindings. I'll
pull the
In theory bindings aim to work with all released versions of 0MQ,
though it's up to each binding group to make this work.
I've been meaning to bring up this topic for a while. It seems to me that
knowing that a specific set of bindings are designed to work with a specific
version of 0MQ is a
Is there any information about internal zmq architecture, classes/methods
description, e.t.c
I found only this so far: http://www.zeromq.org/whitepapers:architecture
This message is intended only for the person(s) to which it is addressed and
may contain
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Sergey Hripchenko
shripche...@intermedia.net wrote:
Is it worth doing to send you patches that are not cross-platform(not
even tested)
(like for example implementation of ‘TCP keep-alives configuration’ via
setsockopt() differs for almost each platform)
On Apr 4, 2012, at 5:44 AM, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 5:06 AM, Colin Johnsun colin.a...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with all previous posters, +1 on 2.2. Semver is easy to
understand. You could refactor the code as much as you want but if it
doesn't change the ABI then it
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Santy, Michael
michael.sa...@dynetics.com wrote:
In theory bindings aim to work with all released versions of 0MQ,
though it's up to each binding group to make this work.
I've been meaning to bring up this topic for a while. It seems to me that
knowing that a
On Apr 4, 2012, at 10:44 AM, Brian Granger wrote:
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Santy, Michael
michael.sa...@dynetics.com wrote:
In theory bindings aim to work with all released versions of 0MQ,
though it's up to each binding group to make this work.
I've been meaning to bring up this
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Santy, Michael
michael.sa...@dynetics.com wrote:
I recall a while back that the C++ bindings went the opposite direction in
that they were split from the core 0MQ distribution into their own project,
but I never really understood the reasoning.
The reason for
The reason for this was that the C++ bindings, like all of them, can
be (and should be) independent from the libzmq bindings. They have
different contributors, different users, different documentation, etc.
OK. Thanks all for the clarification.
Mike
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Sergey Hripchenko
shripche...@intermedia.net wrote:
Is it worth doing to send you patches that are not cross-platform(not even
tested)
(like for example implementation of ‘TCP keep-alives configuration’ via
setsockopt() differs for almost each platform)
Yes.
Can any body guide me on this problem.
Thanks Ronald
From: proj_symb...@live.com
To: zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 10:59:13 +0200
Subject: [zeromq-dev] Publisher receiving message it publishes
Hello Guys,
Thanks for your replies that all worked great. :-)
I have
Dear all,
I thought you'd find this entertaining or possibly even useful as a
fun-with-0MQ example: I hacked support for dispatching 0MQ PUB messages
from a Redis server whenever a Redis key (string only for now) expires.
It's quite limited functionality, should probably be changed to support
21 matches
Mail list logo
