On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Chuck Remes cremes.devl...@mac.com wrote:
On Feb 11, 2012, at 10:53 AM, John D. Mitchell wrote:
On Feb 11, 2012, at 01:51 , john skaller wrote:
On 11/02/2012, at 8:27 PM, niXman wrote:
[...]
Continuing review of the libzmq code, I have found a few situations
.
~Peter Alexander
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Gaspard Bucher gasp...@teti.ch wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Maciej Gajewski
maciej.gajews...@gmail.com wrote:
I did it and it works nicely on Linux and Windows.
You need to disable the notifier before calling ZMQ_EVENTS (and
reading the message
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 7:55 PM, JonnyDee jonny@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
I just would like to let you know that I've re-implemented 'zeromqt'
using ZeroMQ's official C++ binding. It's called 'nzmqt' (https://
github.com/jonnydee/nzmqt) and is a complete re-write which not only
supports PUB-SUB,
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
I've got a lot of respect for this team. Thanks for all the hard work
and the new release!
~Peter Alexander
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http
...@gmail.com:
I can help. We can support other languages in one or as a separated ebuilds
(e.g. zeromq-python), but we need this as a tarball (not as a source from
github).
btw. There is some pgm compilation problem with icc compiler.
regards,
daniel
2010/10/2 Peter Alexander vel.ac
Daniel btw,
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Peter Alexander vel.ac...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Daniel. I spoke to gentoo devs about how bindings should be
packaged awhile ago... should it be one zeromq package with use flags
for the bindings _or_ separate packages for each binding. They said
,
daniel
2010/10/2 Peter Alexander vel.ac...@gmail.com
Hi Pieter. Yes worked fine. I edited the page very basicly for now,
which I'll touch up later. Thank you.
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 11:44 PM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote:
Peter,
Thanks for pointing out the broken distro
distribute via gentoo mirrors.
daniel
True. And besides, tarballs should be provided irrespectively.
btw. There is some pgm compilation problem with icc compiler.
regards,
daniel
2010/10/2 Peter Alexander vel.ac...@gmail.com
Hi Pieter. Yes worked fine. I edited the page
Hi all. I've noticed that zeromq-2.0.9 has been included recently in
the Gentoo Linux package tree, and I just now submitted an ebuild to
them for git master (available at [1]).
I've noticed that there is no distro page on the wiki as of yet. Is
something you'd like to pronounce or maybe not
will need to login to the Wikidot platform.
Thanks
Pieter
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 4:51 AM, Peter Alexander vel.ac...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all. I've noticed that zeromq-2.0.9 has been included recently in
the Gentoo Linux package tree, and I just now submitted an ebuild to
them for git master
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Oliver Smith oli...@kfs.org wrote:
On 8/12/2010 2:47 AM, Mark V wrote:
Good point. Maybe the code examples from the main text can
(eventually) be reproduced in an Examples sub-section for each
language.
This suggests systematic labeling each of code
Yes. This along with net-neutrality concerns, are very troublesome.
Ever since I read Martin's post, the word federation has been stuck in my
mind. This one word accurately describes part of the vision I have for my
data laboratory project.
And naturally, thanks to 0mq it makes a federation of
Hi Pieter,
Have you seen
http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/gitworkflows.html
regards.. ~Peter
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 7:15 AM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've written up a proposal for working on the git repository. I'd
appreciate input, especially from
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Peter Alexander vel.ac...@gmail.com
wrote:
Have you seen
http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/gitworkflows.html
Yes, it's similar in some ways but more complex. Also I've
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Peter Alexander vel.ac...@gmail.com
wrote:
But then again there is a page dedicated for contributing patches, so
disregard the last observation or maybe consolidate the two pages.
Good
Hey Chuck
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Chuck Remes cremes.devl...@mac.com wrote:
On Jul 19, 2010, at 5:40 AM, Peter Alexander wrote:
Do any of you have the history of irc log files?
I'm going to put up for public hosting and search-able.
I saw on irc that you mentioned you have
Do any of you have the history of irc log files?
I'm going to put up for public hosting and search-able.
Thanks..
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
The source documentation, for contributing and binding developers, are now
being updated automatically with each git commit to the mainline development
branch (master) on Github.
Still a work in progress like a strategy for the source comments, etc.
The link below[1] will be accessible from the
Hi mato.
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Martin Lucina m...@kotelna.sk wrote:
Hi Peter,
having read through this thread I have the following comments:
1) Re. developer documentation generated from the source with Doxygen: I
have no real opinion on this, other than to concur with others
Well I'm kind of excited. I just noticed that the Wikidot API is
back[1] and is stated to be better than it was before. Nice!
Wikidot really is a great platform and now that it has this
fundamental component again, I look forward to diving in.
Since the API is still in alpha, a request for a key
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 1:38 AM, Martin Sustrik sust...@250bpm.com wrote:
Pieter Hintjens wrote:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 11:08 PM, Peter Alexander vel.ac...@gmail.com wrote:
http://travlr.github.com/zeromq2/
Peter, it looks really nice and this looks like the right way to host
the generated
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 7:16 AM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Martin Sustrik sust...@250bpm.com wrote:
There are several possible advantages of this:
Agreed.
As for the actual publishing of the docs, I've been thinking about it a
bit and here are
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 8:06 AM, Martin Sustrik sust...@250bpm.com wrote:
Peter Alexander wrote:
1. It doesn't make sense to distribute the generated docs with the
package. Packages are for users. Users don't need detailed code
documentation. Developers, on the other hand, are presumably
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Peter Alexander vel.ac...@gmail.com wrote:
Abstract
===
This thread is to introduce for discussion, a documentation overhaul.
Please speak up and add your input. Watch this thread for follow up
posts that will drill down in detail as we go forward
that is becoming very interesting, ymmv.
The more people think about how to explain 0MQ the better IMO. So go for it
and if you need my help, just shout.
Ok, thanks.
-Pieter
Sent from my Android mobile phone.
On Jul 9, 2010 4:32 PM, Peter Alexander vel.ac...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Martin Sustrik sust...@250bpm.com wrote:
Brian Granger wrote:
/me back from holiday!
Btw: http://berezecki.com/?p=22
Great link, thanks! This is a brilliant and simple idea as well.
Although to implement this, it would require tracking how many
messages
Hi.
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 11:57 AM, hamster yidiepxgx...@spammotel.com wrote:
Hello!
I am a newbie with 0mq so I beg my pardon if this question looks boring, yet
quick overview of docs/faqs/maillist gave me no answer.
Yeah doc organization is still a work in progress. But as your
learning
Hi Martin
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Martin Lucina m...@kotelna.sk wrote:
matt_weinst...@yahoo.com said:
In my opinion the proper solution is to use the same semantics as the
close() system call, in other words, zmq_close() shall invalidate the
socket from the caller's point of view
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Holger Hoffstaette
holger.hoffstae...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 11:08:13 -0500, Brian Granger wrote:
The current load balancing algorithm used by the XREQ socket is defined in
lb.cpp. Requests are simply round robin'ed through the active pipes:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Peter Alexander vel.ac...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Holger Hoffstaette
holger.hoffstae...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 11:08:13 -0500, Brian Granger wrote:
The current load balancing algorithm used by the XREQ socket
Hi Martin,
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 3:55 AM, Martin Sustrik sust...@250bpm.com wrote:
This regression results from removing some kernel-bypass functionality
(namely lock-free polling) in exchange for more functionality (namely
allowing for more than 63 threads to use 0MQ sockets).
Just out
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 5:06 AM, Martin Sustrik sust...@250bpm.com wrote:
Peter,
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 3:55 AM, Martin Sustrik sust...@250bpm.com wrote:
This regression results from removing some kernel-bypass functionality
(namely lock-free polling) in exchange for more functionality
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Martin Sustrik sust...@250bpm.com wrote:
I think we are missing this kind of discussion of pipeline paradigm in
the documentation.
Once I wrote this article:
http://www.zeromq.org/tutorials:butterfly
However is misses the overall introduction (and the code
Hi Nicholas,
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 4:54 AM, Nicholas Piël nicho...@nichol.as wrote:
Hi all,
I've written an introduction to ZeroMQ for my blog, you can find it here:
http://nichol.as/zeromq-an-introduction
I also want to congratulate you on a great introductory article. Very
concise..
Hi Martin,
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Martin Sustrik sust...@250bpm.com wrote
I believe the send_requests is the initial node of the pipeline. It
produces request. Down the stream there's arbitrary number of
components which do the actual processing and generate replies.
Further down
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 3:43 AM, Apps, John john.a...@hp.com wrote:
Hmm. Not sure if this has anything to do with multi-core, SOA or enterprises.
Is it not more to do with the lack of courage to break new ground, try new
things, leave the past behind - we have been doing it this way for 50
Being self-taught in all things computer science Mato, I take every
opportunity to emphasize how important well thought out documentation
(especially examples) is to an OSS community.
So thank you very much for your work.
~Peter
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Martin Lucina m...@kotelna.sk
38 matches
Mail list logo
