Re: [zeromq-dev] TLS (openssl) for ZeroMQ

Boccassi wrote: > On Tue, 2018-12-25 at 11:47 -0500, Steven McCoy wrote: > > A common workaround is to dynamically pull in OpenSSL at > > runtime. Have a > > context option that specifies the OpenSSL “.so” or “.dll” path and > > cache > > the required API insi

Re: [zeromq-dev] [External] Re: A PGM/EPGM question

es the pgm state > machine to do things, *however my issue here is how to accomplish that > from the ZMQ API layer*, that is the whole point of using ZMQ in my case > in the first place. > > > > Any thoughts? And thanks of the comments. > > > > *From:* zeromq-dev

Re: [zeromq-dev] [External] Re: A PGM/EPGM question

respond > with unicast NAKs when data loss is detected. > > > > Any ideas as to how a user should get ZMQ lib to trigger NAKs processing > for a PUB socket using either pgm/epgm transports? > > > > Thanks, > > Antonio Montero. > > *From:* zeromq-dev [mail

Re: [zeromq-dev] A PGM/EPGM question

You should check the PUB socket has a loop that is processing the incoming NAK requests, this is usually recv call based. The symptoms indicate that the protocol is operating TX-only. — Steve-o On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 19:50 Montero, Antonio UTC CCS < antonio.mont...@fs.utc.com> wrote: > Hello,

[zeromq-dev] AF_UNIX on Windows 10

I guess time to update the build scripts, > *Unix style sockets (AF_UNIX) are available on Windows*AF_UNIX is an > address family which has enabled inter-process communication on Unix for > countless years. The windows equivalent is named pipes, which offers > similar facilities. Based on user

Re: [zeromq-dev] openpgm

Flipping the direction and failing suggests that one of the hosts may have not correctly determined the local network interfaces. You can always explicitly set the local interfaces to bind to when creating the socket. Later versions in GitHub have corrected some known interface issues with newer

[zeromq-dev] FYI: RSSL/Java now open source

Reuters proprietary protocol suite with TCP and a couple of multicast flavours has been opened up fro a while now, albeit Java-only so far: https://github.com/thomsonreuters/Elektron-SDK/tree/master/Java/Eta/Source/impl/com/thomsonreuters/upa/transport This may be an interesting project for

Re: [zeromq-dev] On hooking memory allocations

On 2 December 2016 at 04:50, Auer, Jens wrote: > thanks for the suggestion. I will definitely gie it a try. I tried > tcmalloc and jemalloc once, but the improvement was not so big. If I > understood tcmalloc correctly they use a per-thread cache for allocations. > I didn't

Re: [zeromq-dev] BDFL literally

Is zero.mq owned by someone else? On 6 October 2016 at 17:39, Ewen McNeill wrote: > On 6/10/16 20:18, Trevor Bernard wrote: > >> Don't worry about sponsorship. My company will pay to renew them for >> the next while (within reason). Just send me the details and I'll

Re: [zeromq-dev] ZeroMQ Reliable Multicast just halts and never continues

It is probably worth checking whether NAK sending and processing is actually working. Ethernet networks are pretty reliable these days and the outage may be linked with the only packet loss occurring. -- Steve-o On 15 June 2016 at 10:23, Paul Krauss wrote: > Hi

Re: [zeromq-dev] Question about PGM Pub/Sub

On 11 April 2016 at 05:42, Luedicke, Jens wrote: > > > The sockets are connected to “epgm://eth1;239.255.255.255.0:”. > > > > If I start the processes on different systems in my LAN, everything works > fine. However, > > once I set a packet loss on one network

Re: [zeromq-dev] select and Multiple Provider Restrictions on Windows

On 27 January 2016 at 09:07, Ilya Kulakov wrote: > According to > https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms739177(v=vs.85).aspx > , > implementation of POSIX's select on Windows restricts fd_set to contain > descriptors from only one provider. > This

Re: [zeromq-dev] Potential bug in select

On 27 January 2016 at 10:15, Ilya Kulakov wrote: > Hi, > > I found the following 2 chunks of code suspecting: > > - https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/blob/master/src/select.cpp#L110-L113 > - https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/blob/master/src/select.cpp#L170-L173 > > Why do

Re: [zeromq-dev] random missed messages with epgm pub/sub

On 12 January 2016 at 08:27, Bart van Wissen wrote: > Our observations: > - For random topics, random messages are not received by the subscriber > > This is an inherit problem if the senders are short lived, the only solution is to add a broker that can maintain a longer

Re: [zeromq-dev] PGM and sending interface

On 6 January 2016 at 04:47, Jim Hague wrote: > I've not read RFC3678 before, but after a quick look it seems to me that > the > RFC isn't concerned with the socket binding, and hence the source address > used. > > Yes, the source of a multicast is specified usually by the

Re: [zeromq-dev] PGM and sending interface

On 5 January 2016 at 09:41, Jim Hague wrote: > I've read the network parameters docs, and I don't think it helps in my > case. > ZMQ pgm_socket.cpp calls pgm_getaddrinfo() to parse the transport, and then > uses the interface number when setting up the call to pgm_bind3().

Re: [zeromq-dev] PGM and sending interface

On 5 January 2016 at 13:34, Jim Hague wrote: > I think AIX is a bit of a red herring here. I can produce exactly the same > scenario on Linux using iproute2 Interesting, thus this invalidates most of RFC 3678: /* section 5.1 of RFC 3678: basic (delta-based)

Re: [zeromq-dev] PGM and sending interface

On 22 December 2015 at 05:31, Jim Hague wrote: > Unfortunately, I have some configurations that have more than one IP > address > assigned to an interface. To be clear, I don't mean a Linux aliased > interface > like eth0:1. I mean > > $ ip addr > ... > 2: eth0:

Re: [zeromq-dev] No rate limitation using JZMQ

On 18 December 2015 at 12:44, Benjamin Errouane wrote: > A new parameter was added in PGM that can set the individual limits for >> Original Data (ODATA) and Repair Data (RDATA) packets thus reserving >> bandwidth for repairs and ancillary data. > > > Are these parameters

Re: [zeromq-dev] Is there any retransmission mechanism in ZMQ?

On 20 November 2015 at 01:33, Noh, Jangho wrote: > I expected subscribers send NAK and publishers send NCF and RDATA. > However, I could not find those packets using wireshark. > If you do not see a NAK on the wire it is possible the network specification are insufficient

Re: [zeromq-dev] ZMQ, multicast and MTU

On 20 November 2015 at 16:27, Jim Hague wrote: > I guess I'd need to set the PGM socket option PGM_MTU to achieve this, but > that's not exposed in ZMQ. Indeed, it seems to be set in ZMQ, but it's > nailed > to 1500 (pgm_max_tpdu). > > I'm thinking of creating a patch to add a

Re: [zeromq-dev] why PGM is not a complete multicast protocol?

On 4 November 2015 at 18:53, Noh, Jangho wrote: > Question#1. > > According to Juniper Networks, PGM is not a complete multicast protocol. > Why is that? > > How PGM makes distribution path??? > > > > PGM adds reliability to multicast traffic streams. *It is not a complete

Re: [zeromq-dev] ZeroMQ License

On 15 October 2015 at 16:57, Peter Ritter wrote: > I got a quick question about the ZeroMQ license. I was under the > impression that ZeroMQ is distributed under the LGPL license (GNU Lesser > General Public License). However, I just used the Windows installer (64Bit) > and

[zeromq-dev] Request for comments on Windows packing

I'm looking to grab a Windows 10 KN VM and start building new Windows packages again. Interested in feedback on what to support and how. In looking at 64-bit supported Windows that could limit the platforms to MSVC 2012/v110, MSVC 2013/v120, and MSVC 2015/v140. I don't see much point for 32-bit

Re: [zeromq-dev] Problems with ZeroMQ 4.1.2 and multicast transports on Windows

On 23 July 2015 at 15:23, Andrew Novikov as.a...@gmail.com wrote: If ZMQ_RATE of the multicast socket is lower than about 8 megabits per second, packets are sent to the network at the specified rate. But if the rate is set higher than that number, messages begin to get queued and newer

Re: [zeromq-dev] pgm over ipv6

On 2 June 2015 at 19:04, Sergey Zinov s.zi...@emw.hs-anhalt.de wrote: it seems that pgm/epgm transport over ipv6 does not work as supposed. When a loss(even single) occurs, subscriber pauses for several seconds, then resumes skipping the lost packets. This implies recovery is not functioning

Re: [zeromq-dev] Casting bug in atomic_counter.hpp - probably only on non x86 or ARM CPUs.

On 2 June 2015 at 07:51, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) drkir...@kirkbymicrowave.co.uk wrote: atomic_counter.hpp:87:71: error: invalid conversion from 'volatile integer_t* {aka volatile unsigned int*}' to 'uint32_t* {aka unsigned int*}' [-fpermissive] This is line 87 which the

Re: [zeromq-dev] Preferred Transport to Handle Lossy Networks?

On 1 June 2015 at 12:33, Peter Krey k...@ripple.com wrote: Yes use the PGM or EPGM transport. If you want to use an additional layer at the application level, you can implement your own resend logic with message sequence numbers if your network is truely massively losing messages. I think

Re: [zeromq-dev] Website For Windows Installers (miru.hk) Is Down

Oops, an nginx misconfiguration for IPv6 apologies if you are using that. Also, IPv4 it requires HTTP 1.1 virtual hosts support, i.e. stick 97.107.136.71 miru.hk in the hosts file and operate as normal. Alternatively use a command line tool such as cURL and bypass DNS like this: curl -O

Re: [zeromq-dev] Website For Windows Installers (miru.hk) Is Down

it and it is still down. This link doesn't work: http://miru.hk/archive/ZeroMQ-4.0.4~miru1.0-x86.exe On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Steven McCoy steven.mc...@miru.hk wrote: The site was under maintenance due to moving data centers, it is back up now but the latest version available is 4.0.4

Re: [zeromq-dev] Website For Windows Installers (miru.hk) Is Down

The site was under maintenance due to moving data centers, it is back up now but the latest version available is 4.0.4 -- Steve-o On 25 March 2015 at 18:16, Peter Rosario peter.j.rosa...@rrd.com wrote: Website for windows installers (miru.hk) is down. I am evaluating ZeroMQ to see if I

Re: [zeromq-dev] Website For Windows Installers (miru.hk) Is Down

switch. I merely have to replace the host name with the host IP address. That is what I have done and it doesn't work. Have you clicked on the link http://97.107.136.71/archive/ZeroMQ-4.0.4~miru1.0-x86.exe to see for yourself? On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Steven McCoy steven.mc

Re: [zeromq-dev] Website For Windows Installers (miru.hk) Is Down

Can you visit the page http://miru.hk/zeromq/ ? You may be really unlucky and your anti-virus is blocking something. :( -- Steve-o On 26 March 2015 at 16:34, Peter Rosario peter.j.rosa...@rrd.com wrote: I stand corrected. You are right (I haven't done virtual hosting in a long while)​.

Re: [zeromq-dev] set ZMQ_RATE not working with OpenPGM?

On 7 January 2015 at 04:05, Meng Zhuo mengzhuo1...@gmail.com wrote: After I set rate with 31415, log shows zeromq had accepted it. but the OpenPGM still shows Setting ODATA rate regulation to 12500 bytes per second. Try setting the Rate before issuing the Connect() on the socket. --

Re: [zeromq-dev] Building ZeroMQ on Windows

On 7 December 2014 at 15:08, Kirby Ross kirby.ros...@gmail.com wrote: ZeroMQ-2.20~miru1.0-win32 czmq-2.2.0 cppzmq-master When I bring up the czmq project in VS 2008 and try and build it. I continue to get this error: fatal error C1083: Cannot open include file: 'zmq.h': No such file or

Re: [zeromq-dev] Aeron messaging

On 19 November 2014 04:58, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote: Not sure about this. It looks like we can do ZeroMQ better, and yet they stay away from mentioning ZeroMQ as a competitor (as did Martin in his Strange Loop talk). I mean, how can you say open source high performance messaging

[zeromq-dev] Aeron messaging

From a developer from 29 West (LBM et al) and LMAX (Disruptor) previously creating Simple Binary Encoding (SBE) message encoding we now have the Aeron transport. I think they just need to add someone from Lockless Inc. *

Re: [zeromq-dev] PyZMQ with Libsodium on Windows?

I think it is easier now as they have more support than just MSVC2013 (C99 compat) when crypto was added to ZeroMQ. On 9 October 2014 17:47, MinRK benjami...@gmail.com wrote: It's not bundled simply because I couldn't build it on Windows. If you can come up with a simple fix for building

Re: [zeromq-dev] libzmq v4.0.5

Fair warning I am not in a position to push 4.0.5 Windows packages when the release is official. I'm currently on an OSX macbook without any Windows or MSVC toolsets \:D/ -- Steve-o On 21 September 2014 18:13, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote: Hi all, This is a pre-release

Re: [zeromq-dev] Trouble compiling czmq under Visual Studio

On 12 September 2014 11:12, Tom Quarendon tom.quaren...@teamwpc.co.uk wrote: Since Visual Studio doesn’t support C99, the C source files are compiled as C++. This appears to have thrown up a type issue. MSVC 2013 supports most of C99, its not so important any more. -- Steve-o

Re: [zeromq-dev] Send and receive using link-local IPv6 address using zmq 3.2.3 and czmq 1.4.1

On 10 September 2014 01:49, Gerrit Hendrikus van Doorn g.h.vando...@gmail.com wrote: And the same address? Those are not the most helpful examples to provide. Do the non-CZMQ versions work? Do you have ip6tables running? I mentioned that I run the applications on the same machine (to

Re: [zeromq-dev] Send and receive using link-local IPv6 address using zmq 3.2.3 and czmq 1.4.1

On 9 September 2014 18:51, Gerrit Hendrikus van Doorn g.h.vando...@gmail.com wrote: Correction: I do use the same ports when testing (so both 5 or 54321) And the same address? Those are not the most helpful examples to provide. Do the non-CZMQ versions work? Do you have ip6tables

Re: [zeromq-dev] Lock-free algorithms

On 4 September 2014 06:32, Michi Henning mi...@triodia.com wrote: https://code.google.com/p/thread-sanitizer/issues/detail?id=69 In the context of lock-free techniques in zmq, one of the commenters mentioned: Just a drive-by comment: TSan should not produce false positives on lock-free

Re: [zeromq-dev] How to use the libzmq binaries for Windows?

The libraries should match the CRT version they are built and linked against. As mentioned previously Microsoft are attempting to stop releasing further incompatible CRTs from MSVC2013 onwards. -- Steve-o On 1 August 2014 09:49, Full Name knockoutu...@myway.com wrote: Hello everyone, Have

Re: [zeromq-dev] How to use the libzmq binaries for Windows?

Most of the additional libraries that build above ZeroMQ are using libraries built from the MSVC project or solutions files and not the prepackaged binaries. Windows has particular requirements for CRT compatibility which changes with every compiler release, in addition to regular version and

[zeromq-dev] FlatBuffers from Google

Competition with SBE, http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2014/06/flatbuffers-memory-efficient.html A comparison of these new zero-copy formats: https://kentonv.github.io/capnproto/news/2014-06-17-capnproto-flatbuffers-sbe.html -- Steve-o ___

[zeromq-dev] Dissecting Message Queues by Tyler Treat

I don't think I saw this posted yet: noted on highscalability.com today, http://www.bravenewgeek.com/dissecting-message-queues/ -- Steve-o ___ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Re: [zeromq-dev] JZMQ stable/production ready build

On 26 June 2014 05:54, Benjamin Cordes benjamin.l.cor...@gmail.com wrote: With regards to multicast: is PGM planned for JeroMQ? Would this use the OpenPGM Java implementation? OpenPGM points to https://github.com/steve-o/javapgm , which was last updated a year ago. It's a wish list item.

Re: [zeromq-dev] libzmq ABI compatibility across msvc versions

On 13 May 2014 04:10, Daniel Krikun dkrik...@gmail.com wrote: There are binary installers for windows ( http://zeromq.org/distro:microsoft-windows) which are very convenient to use. The installer for legacy version 2.2.0 only contains binaries built with vc100 toolkit. If you download the

Re: [zeromq-dev] zmq performance over epgm

On 9 May 2014 07:37, space3...@mail.bg wrote: I am trying to send 50 bytes of data via multicast using epgm protocol and the zmq framework. It takes around 45 seconds for the whole data to arrive at the receiver. HWM is set to 6500, ZMQ_RATE is 100 - for some reason with higher rate

[zeromq-dev] FYI: Simple Binary Encoding

Move over Captain Proto and Protocol Buffers, at 16-25 times faster throughput: http://mechanical-sympathy.blogspot.com/2014/05/simple-binary-encoding.html -- Steve-o ___ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org

Re: [zeromq-dev] Martin Fowler MicroServices

On 23 April 2014 03:33, techbird techb...@birdsoft.co.uk wrote: http://martinfowler.com/articles/microservices.html In this excellent publication Martin Fowler references 0MQ as a possible light weight bus to communicate events/messages between micro-services. This is pretty much the

Re: [zeromq-dev] Strange problem with Openpgm. Help us!

On 18 April 2014 10:25, Michel Pelletier pelletier.mic...@gmail.com wrote: I'm afraid I can't help you with you specific pgm problem, but if you don't mind me playing devil's advocate for a second, it seems like you're doing a lot of engineering work to distribute a file to 20 servers. Have

Re: [zeromq-dev] Yahoo shows big performance improvement by switching Storm from ZeroMQ to Netty

On 7 April 2014 04:10, Asquith, Edward edward.asqu...@baesystems.comwrote: Obviously Netty supports a narrower set of use cases, but being pure Java this certainly caught my attention; better performance and a simplified deployment model is a compelling combo. I think JeroMQ would have

Re: [zeromq-dev] zmq_connect invalid argument specifying nic interface

On 19 March 2014 13:26, Tim Chen che...@gmail.com wrote: I'm getting an invalid argument when I try using pgm w zmq 3.2.4 when my URL looks like: epgm://bond0;239.1.2.3:45678 If I remove bond0 it works fine. Any idea why or how I can get more information on the error? Ideally

Re: [zeromq-dev] encoder::has_data() method deprecated?

On 14 March 2014 18:43, Brian Adamson brian.adam...@nrl.navy.mil wrote: Also, I have a short overview/write-up of what I've done with ZeroMQ/NORM that I can post to the list if there's interest? I'd like to see this. I'd like to see what other features of NORM you can fit in and their

Re: [zeromq-dev] Increasing transparently ZMQ performance up to 2400%

The obvious question is what is the relationship between Torus UFS, Solarflare OpenOnLoad, and Mellanox VMA? On 28 February 2014 12:37, Guillermo Lopez Taboada guillermo.lopez.tabo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Pieter, Our sockets have intra-server latencies (RTT/2 from process to process) as

[zeromq-dev] Sandstorm: 55 Gbps at 72% load

This might be of interest, if rather hilarious as an implementation of anything. Basically a static content webserver that stores content as a tcpdump and just replays the packets bypassing any serious CPU effort.

Re: [zeromq-dev] 0MQ on unicast UDP

On 29 January 2014 09:59, Конюхов Павел kos...@forsys.ru wrote: Can I adapt pgm/epgm to unicast UDP or perhaps there is some other way? The quest has been started here: https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/issues/807 PGM is theoretically agnostic to multicast channel and thus unicast but it

Re: [zeromq-dev] [zmqpp] Indentation style?

OS X and Linux uses the same compilers: GCC and Clang, but different linkers. On 24 January 2014 15:08, Lindley French lindl...@gmail.com wrote: In fact, OSX seems to require a much different build. -soname doesn't seem to be supported, -f isn't a valid flag to ar, etc. On Fri, Jan 24,

Re: [zeromq-dev] Best 0MQ usable with gcc-2.95?

On 14 January 2014 12:21, Dmitry Antipov anti...@dev.rtsoft.ru wrote: I need to develop 0MQ-based application for an old (RedHat 7.x-based) system with gcc-2.95. Unfortunately upgrading is practically impossible. Do you have to build on the target system? Use static linking of libc

Re: [zeromq-dev] Linking of libzmq (git HEAD) fails under Mac OS X 10.9 Mavericks, ld: unknown option: --version-script=libzmq.vers

I'm not seeing a version number actually being used in this use case, would it not be more pertinent to just use --export-symbols which would be OSX friendly? https://www.gnu.org/software/gnulib/manual/html_node/LD-Version-Scripts.html Or just using the attributes flags together with Windows

[zeromq-dev] vs110 via msbuild vs120 x64 a no go

In case anyone tries this, a recent update from Microsoft has some how blocked this combination and causes a new unique error message: C:\Program Files (x86)\MSBuild\Microsoft.Cpp\v4.0\V120\Microsoft.Cpp.Platform.targets(58,5): error MSB8032: The Platform or PlatformToolset is not available from

Re: [zeromq-dev] Building on Windows (32 and 64 bit)

On 8 January 2014 10:43, Robin Newton robin.new...@linguamatics.com wrote: The easy thing to do is to use the Windows installers (http://zeromq.org/distro:microsoft-windows) to get the various files I need onto a machine, and then copy them. However:- (a) The latest installers are for

Re: [zeromq-dev] msvc12 project with libsodium

On 3 January 2014 16:10, Balázs Varga bb.va...@gmail.com wrote: Since there's no libzmq with libsodium in the windows installer (v4.0.1). I stopped at 4.0.0.rc1: http://miru.hk/archive/ZeroMQ-4.0.0rc1~nacl~miru1.0-x86.exehttp://miru.hk/archive/ZeroMQ-4.0.0rc1~miru1.0-x86.exe

Re: [zeromq-dev] When unreliability is desired

On 17 December 2013 17:30, Lindley French lindl...@gmail.com wrote: It would be really neat if we could integrate something like http://feclib.sourceforge.net/documentation.html into this. Not sure how that possibility would work license-wise, though. Google's QUIC includes XOR FEC as their

Re: [zeromq-dev] DSCP/Diffserv

On 24 November 2013 06:20, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote: It doesn't, but it's easy enough to add, presumably. For Unix land it is, note that none of this applies to Vista+ which has a completely separate and rather unwieldy set of APIs which they of course rewrote completely for IPv6.

Re: [zeromq-dev] When unreliability is desired

On 7 December 2013 00:34, lindl...@gmail.com wrote: I'll take a look at tipc. I've been using the pgm classes as a reference so far. They appear to use v1_encoder while tcp uses v2_encoder. If you can get a nice clean framework setup independent of the TCP/Unix socket setup I think many

Re: [zeromq-dev] brain foggy -- need help

On 29 October 2013 20:34, Andrew Hume and...@research.att.com wrote: the race condition is, of course, that even when sending significant amounts (MB) of data, the sync message is received and returned before any data socket msgs are processed. Send an inline flag message in the push socket

Re: [zeromq-dev] error: ISO C++ 1998 does not support 'long long'

On 23 October 2013 05:23, Peter Kleiweg pklei...@xs4all.nl wrote: ... sodium/randombytes.h:29: error: ISO C++ 1998 does not support 'long long' It is valid C++11, it looks like libsodium doesn't care too much about the older standards. -- Steve-o

[zeromq-dev] zmq_poll stops expiring timeout in virtualized Windows 7

On 16 October 2013 06:11, Bjorn Reese bre...@mail1.stofanet.dkjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'bre...@mail1.stofanet.dk'); wrote: Alternatively, we could upgrade to C++11 and get a portable solution with std::chrono::steady_clock http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/chrono/steady_clock You can

Re: [zeromq-dev] zmq_poll stops expiring timeout in virtualized Windows 7

On 16 October 2013 06:11, Bjorn Reese bre...@mail1.stofanet.dk wrote: Alternatively, we could upgrade to C++11 and get a portable solution with std::chrono::steady_clock Ok, here you go: *a steady clock is not necessarily monotonic*. https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/7719 -- Steve-o

Re: [zeromq-dev] zmq_poll stops expiring timeout in virtualized Windows 7

On 16 October 2013 10:25, Laurent Alebarde l.aleba...@free.fr wrote: A simplier approach is to encapsulate the standard clock of your choice and save in a static member the value of the last get. Then if the standard clock goes back in time, you return the saved value + 1. For clock drift

Re: [zeromq-dev] Automatic generation of project files (CZMQ, CMake, ...)

On 15 October 2013 11:15, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote: For what it's worth I'm moving CZMQ to automatically generate its project files from a single minimal data file. We're generating CMake, autoconf, MSVC, Android, and MingW32 files. A make maker maker, I'm sure that is gong to

Re: [zeromq-dev] zmq_poll stops expiring timeout in virtualized Windows 7

On 15 October 2013 13:48, Felipe Farinon felipe.fari...@powersyslab.comwrote: I have found that VirtualBox's QueryPerformanceCounter doesn't guarantee monotonicity https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/11951. They argue that even Windows QueryPerformanceCounter doesn't guarantee it. This is

Re: [zeromq-dev] EPGM network devices support question

On 10 October 2013 20:46, Daniele Stanzani daniele.stanz...@4ward.itwrote: Does EPGM break network devices PGM support? Yes, for the benefit of convenience and that not many users have PGM network devices. -- Steve-o ___ zeromq-dev mailing list

Re: [zeromq-dev] Windows installer for 4.x

On 10 October 2013 04:30, Pieter Hintjens piet...@gmail.com wrote: Not yet. :-) Maybe Friday, bit busy. -- Steve-o ___ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Re: [zeromq-dev] tcp source port

On 7 October 2013 13:05, Frank Rehberger frank.rehber...@web.de wrote: I googled at bit found this page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/URI_scheme Transfering the schema from SSH and SFTP to 0MQ-protocol-URI how about using something like the following syntax to encode the source port into

Re: [zeromq-dev] tcp source port

On 5 October 2013 05:44, Sébastien Rautureau sebrautur...@gmail.com wrote: There may be several options : - extend the following tcp uri format by adding an optionnal local port = tcp://serveradress:serverport:localport This is clearly breaking the format, so not valid. - add a new socket

Re: [zeromq-dev] Why I might want to use JeroMQ if I'm completely fine with JZMQ?

On 1 October 2013 17:00, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote: - JeroMQ does not support pgm:// or epgm:// since OpenPGM has no Java version Technically there is now, just not complete and requires JDK 7. https://github.com/steve-o/javapgm ___

Re: [zeromq-dev] Version 4.0 release fork

On 25 September 2013 11:15, KIU Shueng Chuan nixch...@gmail.com wrote: You could generate the import library from the provided libsodium-4.def file per the instructions at http://www.mingw.org/wiki/MSVC_and_MinGW_DLLs . Importantly there is no 64-bit library and I don't want to bring in all

Re: [zeromq-dev] RE : How to send/receive a custom C++ object via zeromq sockets?

On 18 September 2013 07:47, Michi Henning mi...@triodia.com wrote: I've been working with Cap'n Proto the past two weeks, and I have to say I'm impressed. I've only just stumbled along this, Cap'n Proto is written by the developer of Google Protobufs 2 after having departed Google:

Re: [zeromq-dev] Version 4.0 release fork

Bonus: rc1 plus NaCl for v120 only, curve_keygen.exe uses non-packaged static libraries surprisingly well (16KB): http://miru.hk/archive/ZeroMQ-4.0.0rc1~nacl~miru1.0-x86.exehttp://miru.hk/archive/ZeroMQ-4.0.0rc1~miru1.0-x86.exe

Re: [zeromq-dev] Version 4.0 release fork

On 23 September 2013 23:34, Steven McCoy steven.mc...@miru.hk wrote: 09/23/2013 11:26 PM 1,423,600 libsodium-v120-mt-sgd-0_4_3.lib 09/23/2013 11:26 PM 2,064,212 libsodium-v120-mt-s-0_4_3.lib This is only building on v120/MSVC2013 due to C99 usage. There is some new function

Re: [zeromq-dev] Version 4.0 release fork

On 24 September 2013 09:36, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote: Given that CURVE is still experimental, we can build 4.0.0 without it, on Windows. My hope is that using it in libzmq will push progress on Window packaging for it, but we don't need to have a critical dependency on that. All

Re: [zeromq-dev] Version 4.0 release fork

Ok, I got this far: C:\git\libsodium-0.4.3*build-windows.cmd* Cleaning build area ... Starting build ... Building targets for x86 ... targetting-v120 09/23/2013 11:25 PM 1,376,716 libsodium-v120-mt-sgd-0_4_3.lib 09/23/2013 11:25 PM 1,992,294 libsodium-v120-mt-s-0_4_3.lib

Re: [zeromq-dev] libzmq/3.2.4 stable now available

New Windows packages posted, now with MSVC2012 U3 and MSVC2013 RC whether that makes any difference. Still no idea how to handle the 4.0.0 tree ... ___ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org

Re: [zeromq-dev] Version 4.0 release fork

On 20 September 2013 04:08, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote: I've forked off the libzmq master to https://github.com/zeromq/zeromq4-x, in preparation for release 4.0.0. MSVC2008 is broken due to inttypes.h dependency. I have installers for Windows built sans *libsodium *but mushrooming

Re: [zeromq-dev] C#: recent .NET2.0 compatible versions?

On 11 September 2013 16:01, Igor 'Lo' (И.L.) bombsiteunres...@gmail.comwrote: On one of the project, I **have** to deliver .NET2.0 targeted signed assemblies. Is there any recent version of clrzmq this is suitable to this requirement? I see the trunk uses Linq extensively, which is making it

Re: [zeromq-dev] czmq compilation failure (-Werror)

On 10 September 2013 16:20, Patrick Noffke patrick.nof...@gmail.com wrote: I am attempting to compile czmq with a cross-compiler (gcc 4.8.0), and I am getting a bunch of errors like this: zbeacon.c: In function 'zbeacon_publish': zbeacon.c:176:5: error: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and

Re: [zeromq-dev] Jenkins CI build for windows

On 2 September 2013 05:01, richard_new...@waters.com wrote: Since Travis CI does seem to support windows (though sounds like they will do real soon now), I set up a Jenkins CI build for libzmq on windows at * http://libzmq.cloudapp.net/* http://libzmq.cloudapp.net/ if anyone is interested.

Re: [zeromq-dev] Storm rejecting ZeroMQ

On 26 August 2013 11:22, Andy Pook andy.p...@gmail.com wrote: Nothing above 2.1.7 works … It just a weird, very unstable piece of software. It could have been a really awesome library. But it just has all these weird problems with it. Didn't Zed Shaw also have similar comments, presumably

Re: [zeromq-dev] nitro

On 23 August 2013 13:20, Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.at wrote: http://gonitro.io/ Copy pasting: Q: How is this different than ZeroMQ? Nitro is in many ways a reaction to ZeroMQ (ZMQ), and is heavily inspired by it (especially czmq). The team at bu.mp (that wrote Nitro) uses ZeroMQ

Re: [zeromq-dev] nitro

On 23 August 2013 14:37, Steven McCoy steven.mc...@miru.hk wrote: - On very small (40 byte) TCP messages and inproc messages, ZeroMQ is faster (30-40%) than Nitro; Nitro's use of mutex/cond on socket queues probably costs it there. I'm seeing atypical pthread mutex usage

Re: [zeromq-dev] ZMQ_FLAT_PULL feature discussion

On 13 August 2013 11:29, Daniel Krikun krikun.dan...@gmail.com wrote: -- it is activated using ZMQ_CONFLATE socket option at the receiver side I'm not a fan of using the word *conflate *here as it is clearly not combining any data just dropping. As an alternative I would propose *unary* . --

Re: [zeromq-dev] non-destructive queue iterator?

On 9 August 2013 13:43, Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.at wrote: it's unclear how I would replicate the following queue usage: A queue of pending commands is checked periodically for limit violations; however, the queue entries are not consumed You may be able to simulate functionality

Re: [zeromq-dev] 0MQ, Boost.Asio, and Windows

On 10 August 2013 16:40, Damien Kick dki...@mac.com wrote: Well, the reason that I want to integrate with Boost.Asio is more for getting its implementation of the reactor pattern for free, including timers, etc. I don't know if it is the best pattern, but I appreciate the split made by the

Re: [zeromq-dev] zmq nodejs epgm can't work on mac osx 10.8.3

On 29 July 2013 10:51, yang tao yangtao.com...@gmail.com wrote: apple@appletekiMacBook-Air:/sources/zeromq$ node pub_pgm.js epgm://192.168.1.100;239.192.1.1: apple@appletekiMacBook-Air:/sources/zeromq$ node sub_pgm.js epgm://192.168.1.100;239.192.1.1: Sender and subscriber must

Re: [zeromq-dev] Help: epgm pub/sub does not work

On 29 July 2013 11:01, Wang, Xin (WorldQuant) xin.w...@worldquant.comwrote: int rc = zsocket_connect(subscriber, epgm://10.88.150.227:); int rc = zsocket_connect(subscriber, epgm://eth0;10.88.150.227:);*** * ** Try using the IP of the interface, e.g. int rc =

Re: [zeromq-dev] Unit tests failing on win 8

On Sunday, July 28, 2013, James Gatannah wrote: t may very well fall into the realm of Some tests haven't been ported for windows yet or Just use cmake and don't worry about the tests. Any break is worth investigating if only to raise issues with the toolkit. On Windows MSVC is the primary

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >