Hello,
I am currently evaluating zeromq in PUB/SUB configuration for a video
distribution system.
The server runs on Linux (Scientific Linux 2.6.23.9-i386-1.12-00 #3 SMP
Wed Jun 24 10:34:37 CEST 2009 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux).
The server is written in C and basically does :
/* Initialise 0MQ
Hi Gonzalo,
In answer to the Java bindings issue. I encountered the same problem as
already mentioned in a precedent thread.
I compiled the bindings without problems following README instructions.
If I try the example in /perf:
java -Djava.library.path=/virgoDev/zmq/v2r0p9/lib -classpath
/virgoD
Hi All,
Has anybody anything to say about the test case I posted ?
Any problem to get it ?
thanks,
Daniel
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
I repost the test case:
/*
The server part
*/
#include "../include/zmq.h"
#include "../include/zmq_utils.h"
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
int main (int argc, char *argv [])
{
const char *bind_to;
int message_size;
void *ctx;
void *s;
int rc;
Hi,
I have been digging in the code to understand the mechanism of
allocation/deallocation of the messages in PUB/SUB mode, and I have
found a the way to cure the memory leak.
In pub.cpp:
// Push the message to all destinations.
for (pipes_t::size_type i = 0; i != active;) {
if (!wri
Hi Daniel,
Can you produce the minimal test case that exhibits the behaviour?
I'll have a look at it then.
Martin
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
that
reminds me of my recently reported problem, that poll returns wrong
codes.I thought, that it's been completely my fault, because I
accidentially called poll() twice on a socket before recv()ing, BUT:the second call to poll() should still tell me, that data is
availably, which does not happen (
Sven,
> that reminds me of my recently reported problem, that poll returns wrong
> codes.
> I thought, that it's been completely my fault, because I accidentially
> called poll() twice on a socket before recv()ing, BUT:
> the second call to poll() should still tell me, that data is availably,
> wh
Hello,
Please find enclosed two files resulting from a modified version of the
original remote_th and local_th from zeromq-2.0.9 and recompiled in the
same environment. We want to evidence here a problem where the sender
has difficulties to manage the queue when receiver is slower to
acknowle
> The receiver clients run on a Linux similar platform. The client is
> written in Java with my own bindings since I couldn't make work the
ones
> provided with in jzmq release (problem at run time to locate the
> function libraries, already reported in other mails, and according to
me
> is not sol
> In answer to the Java bindings issue. I encountered the same problem
as
> already mentioned in a precedent thread.
> I compiled the bindings without problems following README
instructions.
> If I try the example in /perf:
> java -Djava.library.path=/virgoDev/zmq/v2r0p9/lib -classpath
> /virgoDev/
gonzalo diethelm wrote:
>> In answer to the Java bindings issue. I encountered the same problem
>>
> as
>
>> already mentioned in a precedent thread.
>> I compiled the bindings without problems following README
>>
> instructions.
>
>> If I try the example in /perf:
>> java -Djava.li
> > Wouldn't this point to the fact that you are not finding the shared
> > library (native code) that underlies the Java binding? Where are
both
> > your libzmq.so and libjzmq.so libraries located? Are both those
> > locations in your LD_LIBRARY_PATH or in any place that can be found
by
> > the dy
gonzalo diethelm wrote:
>> In answer to the Java bindings issue. I encountered the same problem
>>
> as
>
>> already mentioned in a precedent thread.
>> I compiled the bindings without problems following README
>>
> instructions.
>
>> If I try the example in /perf:
>> java -Djava.li
> Well, does this apply to you? This is rather weird, I compile & use
the
> Java binding on a daily basis (on Windows XP) and I have seen people
on
> this list using it from other platforms, and they don't report having
> this problem. Are you in any way modifying the Java binding prior to
its
>
>
Hi Daniel,
Good spot!
Please to submit the patch as described here:
http://www.zeromq.org/docs:contributing
Thanks!
Martin
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
16 matches
Mail list logo
