Justin Vassallo wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> My swap is on raidz1. Df –k and swap –l are showing almost no usage of
> swap, while zfs list and zpool list are showing me 96% capacity. Which
> should i believe?
>
Believe all of them. They are only telling you what they know.
The problem might just be how to
Yeah, can anyone help him? As a passive observer without much of a clue
myself, I'm dying to know from the experts what this poor chap's problem might
be.
Cheers,
Dave
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-di
Brandon High wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:58 PM, Marc Bevand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> For example the Abit AB9 Pro (about $80-90) comes with 10 SATA ports (9
>> internal + 1 internal): 6 from the ICH8R chipset (driver: ahci), 2 from a
>> JMB363 chip (driver: ahci in snv_82 and abov
Mike Gerdts пишет:
> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 8:48 PM, Mike Gerdts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I just experienced a zfs-related crash. I have filed a bug (don't
>> know number - grumble).
It's number is 6709336. I added you second e-mail to the description.
Wbr,
Victor
>> I have a crash dump bu
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 8:48 PM, Mike Gerdts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just experienced a zfs-related crash. I have filed a bug (don't
> know number - grumble). I have a crash dump but little free space. If
> someone would like some more info from the core, please let me know in
> the next f
I just experienced a zfs-related crash. I have filed a bug (don't
know number - grumble). I have a crash dump but little free space. If
someone would like some more info from the core, please let me know in
the next few days.
> ::status
debugging crash dump /pool0/vmcore.0 (64-bit) from sun
oper
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 7:37 PM, Jim Litchfield at Sun
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think you'll find that any attempt to make zones (certainly whole root
> ones) will fail after this.
In no way am I speaking authoritatively on this (I really wish all the
install, lu, patch code was open...), bu
Hi,
My swap is on raidz1. Df -k and swap -l are showing almost no usage of
swap, while zfs list and zpool list are showing me 96% capacity. Which
should i believe?
Justin
# df -hk
Filesystem size used avail capacity Mounted on
/dev/dsk/c3t0d0s1 14G 4.0G10G
I think you'll find that any attempt to make zones (certainly whole root
ones) will fail after this.
Jim
---
Mike Gerdts wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Bob Friesenhahn
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On my heavily-patched Solaris 10U4 system, the size of /var (on UFS)
>> has gotten
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Bob Friesenhahn
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On my heavily-patched Solaris 10U4 system, the size of /var (on UFS)
> has gotten way out of hand due to the remarkably large growth of
> /var/sadm. Can this directory tree be safely moved to a zfs
> filesystem? How muc
You should contact the storage community and hopefully get a hold of the
responsible engineer. This is a firewire bug, not a ZFS bug.
- Eric
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 03:56:52PM -0700, Matt Cowger wrote:
> Anyone willing to provide the modified kernel binaries for opensolaris2008.05?
>
>
> Thi
Anyone willing to provide the modified kernel binaries for opensolaris2008.05?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On my heavily-patched Solaris 10U4 system, the size of /var (on UFS)
has gotten way out of hand due to the remarkably large growth of
/var/sadm. Can this directory tree be safely moved to a zfs
filesystem? How much of /var can be moved to a zfs filesystem without
causing boot or runtime issue
On Sat, 31 May 2008, Matt Cowger wrote:
> Sure. Here's the thread discussing the overall issue:
>
> http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=36365&tstart=0
I found that via Google as well as this bug entry
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6560174
This is really unfort
On Sat, 31 May 2008, Matt Cowger wrote:
> I can't believe its almost a year later, with a patch provided, and
> this bug is still not fixed.
>
> For those of us that cant recompile the sources, it makes solaris
> useless if we want to use a firewire drive.
Can you provide the history behind thi
David Magda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On May 31, 2008, at 06:03, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> > The other method works as root if you use -atime (see man page) and is
> > available since 13 years.
>
> Would it be possible to assign an RBAC role to a regular user to
> accomplish this? If so, w
I can't believe its almost a year later, with a patch provided, and this bug is
still not fixed.
For those of us that cant recompile the sources, it makes solaris useless if we
want to use a firewire drive.
--m
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
fwiw, here are my previous posts:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=61301&tstart=30
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=62120&tstart=0
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discu
Seriously, can anyone help me? I've been asking for a week. No relevant
answers, just a couple of answers but none solved my problem or even pointed me
in the right way, and my posts were bumped down into oblivion.
I don't know how to ask. My home server has been offline for over a week now
bec
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:58 PM, Marc Bevand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For example the Abit AB9 Pro (about $80-90) comes with 10 SATA ports (9
> internal + 1 internal): 6 from the ICH8R chipset (driver: ahci), 2 from a
> JMB363 chip (driver: ahci in snv_82 and above, see bug 6645543), and 2 fro
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 7:06 AM, Justin Vassallo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> WD supply enterprise class SATA drives whose prevailing feature is a low
> TLER (RE series). This makes the drive report a failed block quickly, rather
> than trying to recover the blocks for minutes. In a consumer PC, th
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 9:18 AM, David Magda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On May 31, 2008, at 06:03, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
>> The other method works as root if you use -atime (see man page) and is
>> available since 13 years.
>
> Would it be possible to assign an RBAC role to a regular user to
On May 31, 2008, at 06:03, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> The other method works as root if you use -atime (see man page) and is
> available since 13 years.
Would it be possible to assign an RBAC role to a regular user to
accomplish this? If so, would you know which one?
Historically backups ran as
Bob said:
> SATA "enterprise" drives seem more like a gimmick than anything else.
> Perhaps the warranty is longer and they include a tiny bit more smarts
> in the firmware.
WD supply enterprise class SATA drives whose prevailing feature is a low
TLER (RE series). This makes the drive report a f
Hi All,
After a LOT of tinkering I eventually determined exactly where I am going
wrong. It's to do with the ZFS ACLs I am applying. Why this is resulting in the
behaviour I am seeing, I do not know - perhaps someone can spell it out to me.
To cut a long story short, this is how I am creating
"J.P. King" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > A cleanly written filesystem provides clean and abstract interfaces to do
> > anything you like with the filesystem, it's content and metadata. In such an
> > environment, there is no need for a utility that knows the disk layout (like
> > ufsdump does)
SS wrote:
> Timely discussion. I too am trying to build a stable yet inexpensive storage
> server for my home lab mostly for playing in the VM world as well as general
> data storage. I've considered several options ranging from the simple linux
> based NAS appliances to older EMC SANs. I finall
Timely discussion. I too am trying to build a stable yet inexpensive storage
server for my home lab mostly for playing in the VM world as well as general
data storage. I've considered several options ranging from the simple linux
based NAS appliances to older EMC SANs. I finally decided to build
28 matches
Mail list logo
