On Oct 29, 2009, at 5:12 PM, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
After several days of trying to get a 1.5TB drive to resilver and it
continually restarting, I eliminated all of the snapshot-taking
facilities which were enabled and
and last night the pool blew that second drive and apparently a third
On Oct 30, 2009, at 10:20 PM, John wrote:
thanks Henrik. This makes perfect sense. More questions.
arc_meta_limit is set to a quarter of the ARC size.
what is arc_meta_max ?
On some systems, I have arc_meta_max > arc_meta_limit.
Example:
arc_meta_used = 29427 MB
arc_meta_limit
>
> Hello John,On Oct 30, 2009,
> at 9:03 PM, John wrote: class="Apple-interchange-newline"> type="cite">Hi,On an idle server, when I
> do a recursive '/usr/bin/ls' on a folder, I see a lot
> of disk activity. This makes sense because the
> results (metadata/data) may not have been
> cached.When I
Hello,
I'm curios how space is counted for this particular system (opensolaris b118)
#zfs list
NAME USED__AVAIL__REFER__MOUNTPOINT
zsan03.10T__2.25T23K__/zsan0
zsan0/fs__ 3.10T__2.25T__6.90G___/zsan0/fs
[b]zsan0/fs/bar-001__ 680
Hello John,
On Oct 30, 2009, at 9:03 PM, John wrote:
Hi,
On an idle server, when I do a recursive '/usr/bin/ls' on a folder,
I see a lot of disk activity. This makes sense because the results
(metadata/data) may not have been cached.
When I do a second "ls" on the same folder right after t
Although ctrl-x might have stopped it, it may still be running at the
background. Make sure to check there are no related processes running...
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://ma
Hi,
On an idle server, when I do a recursive '/usr/bin/ls' on a folder, I see a lot
of disk activity. This makes sense because the results (metadata/data) may not
have been cached.
When I do a second "ls" on the same folder right after the first one finished,
I do see disk activity again.
Can
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009, Darren J Moffat wrote:
> Have you tried using different values for the per dataset aclinherit or
> aclmode properties ?
We have aclmode set to passthrough and aclinherit to passthrough-x (thanks
again Mark!). We haven't tried anything else.
> I'm not sure they will help you
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009, Gaëtan Lehmann wrote:
Yes. It is planned for S10U9.
In the mean time, is there a patch available for Solaris 10?
I can't find it on sunsolve.
Notice that the fix for this requires adding a new kernel scheduling
class with default lower priority than user processes, but
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 09:48:39AM +0100, Ga?tan Lehmann wrote:
>
> Le 4 ao?t 09 ? 20:25, Prabahar Jeyaram a ?crit :
>
> >On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 01:01:40PM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> >>On Tue, 4 Aug 2009, Prabahar Jeyaram wrote:
> >>
> >>>You seem to be hitting :
> >>>
> >>>http://bugs.open
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Gopi Desaboyina
wrote:
> I think your system might be over heating. I observed this kind of behaviour
> in laptops when they get overheated. check if FAN is working or not. How
> frequent it gets rebooted. you could boot from opensolaris LiveCD and keep it
On Oct 30, 2009, at 3:20 AM, Erwin Panen wrote:
Hi folks,
Just recently set-up my first OSOL box, have some Linux background
but am TOTALLY new to OSOL, so please bear with me.
I'm looking to expand usage of PM capable hardware (port multilier).
This will allow to add extensive hd's.
At the
Ok, ctrl-x or whatever combination killed the zfs send. It took some
time,though. Solved problem. Thanks.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/z
Ok, ctrl-x or whatever combination killed the zfs send. It took some
time,though. Solved problem. Thanks.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/z
I am doing a large zfs send | zfs receive and suddenly, during the zfs send,
one drive is faulted. I try to break this zfs send and examine the faulty drive
so the zpool stops being DEGRADED mode. I can not stop this zfs send. I tried
kill -9 PID
CTRL-X
CTRL-Z
CTRL-D
CTRL-C
nothing can stop thi
Hi,
Just for closing this topic. Two issues have been found which caused the slow
write performance on our Sun Storage 7410 with RAIDZ2:
(1) A Opensolaris bug when NFS mount option is set to wsize=32768. Reducing to
wsize=16384 resulted in a performance gain of about factor 2.
http://bugs.ope
Excellent! That worked just fine. Thank you Victor.
-Scott
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Yes but the number of nfs mounts/datastores for ESX is limited; so that would
leave me with limited numer of clones.
Jeff
From: Robert Milkowski [mi...@task.gda.pl]
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 2:31 AM
To: Jeffry Molanus
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
"C. Bergström" wrote:
> Miles Nordin wrote:
> >> "pt" == Peter Tribble writes:
> >>
> >
> > pt> Does it make sense to fold this sort of intelligence into the
> > pt> filesystem, or is it really an application-level task?
> >
> > in general it seems all the time app w
On 30.10.09 02:13, Scott Meilicke wrote:
Hi all,
I received my SSD, and wanted to test it out using fake zpools with files as
backing stores before attaching it to my production pool. However, when I
exported the test pool and imported, I get an error. Here is what I did:
I created a file to
Hi folks,
Just recently set-up my first OSOL box, have some Linux background but
am TOTALLY new to OSOL, so please bear with me.
I'm looking to expand usage of PM capable hardware (port multilier).
This will allow to add extensive hd's.
At the moment I'm using a Sil3132 based PCIe card, which i
Paul B. Henson wrote:
I posted a little while back about a problem we are having where when a
new directory gets created over NFS on a Solaris NFS server from a Linux
NFS client, the new directory group ownership is that of the primary group
of the process, even if the parent directory has the sg
Le 4 août 09 à 20:25, Prabahar Jeyaram a écrit :
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 01:01:40PM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Tue, 4 Aug 2009, Prabahar Jeyaram wrote:
You seem to be hitting :
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6586537
The fix is available in OpenSolaris buil
23 matches
Mail list logo
