On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Arne Jansen wrote:
> On 19.10.2012 11:16, Irek Szczesniak wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Arne Jansen wrote:
>>> We have finished a beta version of the feature. A webrev for it
>>> can be found here:
>>>
>>> http://cr.illumos.org/~webrev/sensille/fits-
to illumos..
> This is about the ZFS filesystem..
> /Tomas
--
Best Regards
Alexander
Dezember, 20 2011
[1] mid:20111220202716.ga11...@suiko.acc.umu.se
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Yep, that's not filesystem issue, it's a kernel VFS level.
Sent from my iPad
On Nov 29, 2011, at 10:17 PM, Cindy Swearingen
wrote:
> I think the "too many open files" is a generic error message about running
> out of file descriptors. You should check your shell ulimit
> information.
>
> On
om Oracle) several times each as well as 2 new installs of Update 8.
When I understand you right is your primary interest to recover your
data on tank pool.
Have you check the way to boot from a Live-DVD, mount your "safe place"
and copy the data on a other machine?
--
Best Regar
re made to be
> used. By the way, 32˚C is a bit high for most servers. Could you
> check the drive temperature with smartctl or ipmi tools?
Thx Ron for answering.
The temp. are between 27° and 31° C checked with smartctl.
At the moment I scrub every sunday.
--
Best Regards
Alexander
Au
00 HDS5C3020ALA632.
Server is standing in the basement by 32°C
The HDs are filled to 80% and the workload ist only most reading.
Whats the best? Scrubbing every week, every second week once a month?
--
Best Regards
Alexander
August, 07 2011
[1] mid:alpine.gso.2.01.1108061337570.1...@freddy
resilver need weeks and the chance that a second or
third HD crashs in that time is high. Murphy’s Law
--
Best Regards
Alexander
August, 06 2011
[1] mid:1688088365.31312644757091.JavaMail.Twebapp@sf-app1
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs
a mirror pool?
Once per month, every 2 weeks, every week.
> Regardless, it is true that two hard failures can take out your whole
> pool.
In RaidZ1 not in Mirror?
--
Best Regards
Alexander
August, 06 2011
[1] mid:alpine.gso.2.01.1108061131170.1...@freddy.si
c1t50024E9003CE0368d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t5000CCA369CA262Bd0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t5000CCA369CBF60Cd0 ONLINE 0 0 0
errors: No known data errors
--
Best Regards
Alexander
Juli
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 16:21 -0700, Freddie Cash wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Freddie Cash wrote:
> > Is there anyway, yet, to import a pool with corrupted space_map
> > errors, or "zio-io_type != ZIO_TYPE_WRITE" assertions?
>...
> Well, by commenting out the VERIFY line for zio->io_t
Hello Erik Trimble and Ian Collins,
thx for quick answering.
My inexperience is solved and I am glad.
--
Best Regards
Alexander
Dezember, 20 2010
[1] mid:4d0fb4a4.1090...@oracle.com
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss
hat is the command to start resilver and what is the different?
--
Best Regards
Alexander
Dezember, 20 2010
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
that the BIOS is crappy.
Before I install the HBA at supermicro board I will make a reset with
the HBA.
on Dezember, 19 2010, 19:55 wrote in [1]:
> On Dec 16, 2010, at 12:08 PM, Alexander Lesle wrote:
>> Hello Pasi,
>>
>> thx for the quick answer.
>>
>> Its
or your decision:
http://constantin.glez.de/blog/2010/01/home-server-raid-greed-and-why-mirroring-still-best
--
Best Regards
Alexander
Dezember, 17 2010
[1] mid:382802084.111292604519623.javamail.tweb...@sf-app1
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
:20101216195305.gz2...@reaktio.net geschrieben:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 08:43:02PM +0100, Alexander Lesle wrote:
>> Hello All,
>>
>> I want to build a home file and media server now. After experiment with a
>> Asus Board and running in unsolve problems I have bought this
>&
set
SATA#1 from IDE to AHCI.
Can zfs handle AHCI for rpool?
Can zfs handle AHCI for tank?
Thx for helping.
--
Regarrds
Alexander
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
errors
Hm. Why are there no errors shown for the logs devices?
Thanks a lot,
Alexander
--
↯Lifestream (Twitter, Blog, …) ↣ http://alexs77.soup.io/ ↯
↯ Chat (Jabber/Google Talk) ↣ a.sk...@gmail.com , AIM: alexws77 ↯
___
zfs-discuss mailing li
cases.
But its _not_ MegaRaid. MegaRaid is not necessary when using ZFS and
here I wont use a hardware raid system. ;-)
--
Mit freundlichem Gruss
Regards
Alexander
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org
card? Because its supports 6.0 Gb/s SATA.
--
Regards
Alexander
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Hello again!
2010/9/24 Gary Mills :
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 12:01:35AM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
>> Yes. I was rather thinking about RAIDZ instead of mirroring.
>
> I was just using a simpler example.
Understood. Like I just wrote, we're actually now going
to use mir
nment (as far as the
storage is concerned), I'd say it's certain that one side of the mirror
failing doesn't harm the other side.
Thanks,
Alexander
--
↯ Lifestream (Twitter, Blog, …) ↣ http://alexs77.soup.io/ ↯
↯ Chat (Jabber/Google Talk) ↣ a.sk...@gmail.com , AIM: alexws77
Hi!
2010/9/23 Gary Mills
>
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 05:48:09PM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> >
> > We're using ZFS via iSCSI on a S10U8 system. As the ZFS Best
> > Practices Guide http://j.mp/zfs-bp states, it's advisable to use
> > redundancy (ie. R
on't have
ECC, do they?
So, I wonder - what's the recommendation, or rather, experience as far
as home users are concerned? Is it "safe enough" now do use ZFS on
non-ECC-RAM systems (if backups are around)?
Regards,
Alexander
--
↯ Lifestream (Twitter, Blog, …) ↣ http://alex
Hello Karol,
you wrote at, 29. Juli 2010 02:23:
> I appear to be getting between 2-9MB/s reads from individual disks
It sounds for me that you have a hardware failure because 2-9 MB/s
are less than dropping.
> 2x LSI 9200-8e SAS HBAs (2008 chipset)
> Supermicro 846e2 enclosure with LSI sasx36 e
Hi all,
Im trying to replace broken LUN in pool using zpool replace -f ,
but it fails. Physical disk is already replaced, and new lun has the
same address as broken one. But zpool detach/attach works.
This is simple configration:
pool: mypool
state: DEGRADED
status: One or more devices has e
Hi,
the only thing that might help is an export/import, so zfs is forced to re-scan
the pool for operative devices. If that doesn't help
If you suspect the server itself to be the problem, try to attach the drives to
a different box and import the pool there. Just make sure, that the 'new'
Are there any plans to have a tool to restore individual files from zfs send
streams - like ufsrestore?
Specially for recovering from unintended file removal/changes of OS related
files it would be nice to be able to restore just the file in question, instead
of restoring the entire filesystem.
> > Is it possible to extend boot-archive in such a way
> that it include most of the files necessary for
> mounting /etc from separate pool? Have someone tried
> such configurations?
>
> What does the live CD do?
I'm not sure that it is the same configuration, but maybe it is quite
similar... Li
Is it possible to have /etc on separate zfs pool in OpenSolaris?
The purpose is to have rw non-persistent main pool and rw persistent /etc...
I've tried to make legacy etcpool/etc file system and mount it in
/etc/vfstab...
Is it possible to extend boot-archive in such a way that it include most
I've hsut bought second drive for my hope PC and decided to do mirror. I've
made
pfexec zpool attach rpool c9d0s0 c13d0s0
waited for scrub and tried to install grub on second disk:
$ pfexec installgrub /boot/grub/stage1 /boot/grub/stage2 /dev/rdsk/c13d0s0
cannot open/stat device /dev/rdsk/c13
Hi!
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 15:55, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Alexander Skwar
> wrote:
>> $ sudo zfs create rpool/rb-test
>>
>> $ zfs list rpool/rb-test
>> NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
>> rpool/rb-test
Hi.
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 15:35, Ross Walker wrote:
> On Dec 11, 2009, at 4:17 AM, Alexander Skwar
> wrote:
>
>> Hello Jeff!
>>
>> Could you (or anyone else, of course *G*) please show me how?
[...]
>> Could you please be so kind and show what exactly
>
e able to do "zfs rollback rpool/rb-test...@01",
but that would destroy rpool/rb-test...@02, wouldn't it?
Could you please be so kind and show what exactly
needs to be done?
Thanks a lot,
Alexander
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 08:45, Jeff Bonwick wrote:
> Yes, although it's s
ore it later on (eg. backup to tape, backup to someother filesystem
using zfs send|recv, rsync, tar, ...)?
Thanks a lot,
Alexander
--
↯ Keine Internetzensur in Deutschland! ↪ http://zensursula.net ↩ ↯
↯ Lifestream (Twitter, Blog, …) ↣ http://alexs77.soup.io/ ↯
↯ Chat (Jabber/Google Talk)
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 09:15 -0800, Mike wrote:
> I had a system that I was testing zfs on using EMC Luns to create a striped
> zpool without using the multi-pathing software PowerPath. Of coarse a
> storage emergency came up so I lent this storage out for temp storage and
> we're still using.
After installing build 127 you can use the webconsole.
--
Mit freundlichem Gruss
Alexander
mailto:gro...@tierarzt-mueller.de
eMail geschrieben mit: The Bat! 4.0.38
unter Windows XP Pro Service Pack 3
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-
I'm not sure if this is exactly what you're looking for but check out the work
around in this bug:
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do;jsessionid=9011b9dacffa0b615db182bbcd7b?bug_id=6559281
Basically Look through "cfgadm -al" and run the following command on the
"unusable" attachmen
Hi.
Good to Know!
But how do we deal with that on older sStems, which don't have the
patch applied, once it is out?
Thanks, Alexander
On Tuesday, July 21, 2009, George Wilson wrote:
> Russel wrote:
>
> OK.
>
> So do we have an zpool import --xtg 56574 mypoolname
> o
e this side of Christmas.
> --
> This message posted from opensolaris.org
> ___
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
>
Alexander
--
[[ http://zensursula.net ]
Hi!
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 14:00, Cyril Ducrocq wrote:
> moreover i added an "on the fly" compression using gzip
You can dump the gzip|gunzip, if you use SSH on-the-fly compression, using
ssh -C
ssh also uses gzip, so there won't be much difference.
Regards,
Ale
1s
sys3m2.36s
Feel free to clean up with 'zfs destroy rpool/zfscachetest'.
real48m40.890s
user1m47.192s
sys8m2.165s
Still on S10 U7 Sparc M4000.
So I'm now inline with the other results - the 2nd run is WAY slower. 4x
as slow.
Alexander
--
[[ http://zensursu
free to clean up with 'zfs destroy rpool/zfscachetest'.
real10m47.747s
user0m54.189s
sys 3m22.039s
This is a M4000 mit 32 GB RAM and two HDs in a mirror.
Alexander
--
[[ http://zensursula.net ]]
[ Soc. => http://twitter.com/alexs77 | http://www.plurk.com/alexs77 ]
[
stream
Why did the "send" or "receive" fail with "invalid backup stream"? Is
sending from
U6 to U7 not supported?
Alexander
PS: Yes, it's about Solaris 10. There are also a lot of other threads
about S10, so
it doesn't seem like S10 is out-of-topic here. Addit
Hallo Jörg!
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 13:53, Joerg
Schilling wrote:
> Alexander Skwar wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>>
>> I've got a fully patched Solaris 10 U7 Sparc system, on which
>> I enabled SNMP disk monitoring by adding those lines to the
>> /etc/sma/snmp/snmp
e expected that SNMP would've returned 261G for
dskAvail. But most certainly not 0 (unless there's 0 space
available, of course...)!
Are the dskTotal, dskAvail and dskUsed figures not supported
on ZFS?
I'm using the SMA snmp daemon that comes with Solaris 10.
Thanks,
Alexander
--
e?
Thanks,
Alexander
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
If you're having issues with a disk contoller or disk IO driver its highly
likely that a savecore to disk after the panic will fail. I'm not sure how to
work around this, maybe a dedicated dump device not on a controller that uses a
different driver then the one that you're having issues with?
First a background to my problem. I am using a Windows XP Pro laptop to host a
VirtualBox OpenSolaris guest. The VDI file is now 30 GB big but a df tells me
that the ZFS pool is using only 20 GB. I want to free up that 10 GB. Hold on, I
know what you're thinking, but this is not a VirtualBox pro
I am wondering if it is possible (or whether it is a valid RFE) to support
file checksums on ZFS (e.g. in the extended file attributes). ZFS also has
block-level checksums - how complicated would it be to construct file-level
checksums from that?
These checksums may be used, for example, to qui
ave you considered using Zones (N1 Grid Containers) instead of xen?
- Alexander Kolbasov
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
50 matches
Mail list logo
