0180c000
0001
skipping system dump - no dump device configured
rebooting...
Res
LOM event: +0h1m59s host reset
etting ...
--
Jeremy Kister
http://jeremy.kister.net./
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss
treatment to the end of the disk as well;
ZFS puts copies of its labels at the beginning and at the end. Oh, and
im not sure what you mean here - I thought p0 was the entire disk in x86 -
and s2 was the whole disk in the partition. what else should i overwrite?
Thanks,
--
Jeremy Kister
http
...
--
Jeremy Kister
http://jeremy.kister.net./
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
: 3KR2FXB77651PJE6
any ideas??
--
Jeremy Kister
http://jeremy.kister.net./
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
to
begin with. Yet 93% of people complied. A request without “because” in it
(”Can I jump the line, please?”) generated 24% compliance.
--
Jeremy Kister
http://jeremy.kister.net./
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
On 9/22/2009 1:55 PM, Jeremy Kister wrote:
(b) 2 of them have 268GB raw
26 HP 300GB SCA disks with mirroring + 2 hot spares
28 * 300G = 8.2T. Not 268G.
Math class is tough!
--
Jeremy Kister
http://jeremy.kister.net./
___
zfs-discuss mailing
import -f tank
that is what is causing the breakage, not necessarily the softlink itself.
how do i amend the CR? should i just make a new one ?
Thanks for your follow up, Trevor.
--
Jeremy Kister
http://jeremy.kister.net./
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs
- no dump device configured
þebooting...
I've googled plenty, but don't see what's going on.
Can anyone tell me how to make this work ?
--
Jeremy Kister
http://jeremy.kister.net./
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
On 9/18/2009 1:51 PM, Steffen Weiberle wrote:
I am trying to compile some deployment scenarios of ZFS.
# of systems
do zfs root count? or only big pools?
amount of storage
raw or after parity ?
--
Jeremy Kister
http://jeremy.kister.net
to include them all in the email to the
list. they're all working fine and are just more raidz1s. but i'll surely
post the entire output of zpool status if anyone wants.
--
Jeremy Kister
http://jeremy.kister.net./
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs
0
replacing DEGRADED 0 0 0
c5t9d0s0/o UNAVAIL 0 0 0 cannot open
c5t9d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
woohoo! i've never had to use either s0 or s0/o, but hey, i'm happy.
Thanks for your help.
--
Jeremy Kister
http
| grep defect
Elements in grown defect list: 3
# smartctl -a /dev/rdsk/c2t4d0 | grep defect
Elements in grown defect list: 3
# smartctl -a /dev/rdsk/c2t5d0 | grep defect
Elements in grown defect list: 2
--
Jeremy Kister
http://jeremy.kister.net
On 2/5/2008 2:45 PM, Jeremy Kister wrote:
1. What do I have to do (short of replacing the seemingly good disk) to
get c3t8d0 back online?
I ended up applying patches 124205-05 and 118855-36. things are much
better now, but there are still [at least] two issues remaining.
with my zpool
On 2/4/2008 5:40 PM, Jeremy Kister wrote:
1. What do I have to do (short of replacing the seemingly good disk) to
get c3t8d0 back online?
I did find a related thread:
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/2006-June/032179.html
but the thread ended without a resolution.
also
online?
2. Is there an alternative to the seemingly necessary reboot when the
zfs pool locks?
3. Is the pool locking due to a possible problem in u3 that is addressed
in u4 and beyond ?
--
Jeremy Kister
http://jeremy.kister.net./
___
zfs-discuss
15 matches
Mail list logo
