-slowing-down-rsync-from-holding-network-saturation-every-5-seconds.html
On 16 Nov 2010 00:20, Louis Carreiro carreir...@gmail.com wrote:
Almost! It seems like it held out a bit further than last time. Now arcsz
hit's 2G (matching 'c'). But it still drops off. It started at 5.6GB/Min and
fell
Hey all1
Recently I've decided to implement OpenSolaris as a target for BackupExec.
The server I've converted into a Storage Appliance is an IBM x3650 M2 w/ ~4TB
of on board storage via ~10 local SATA drives and I'm using OpenSolaris
svn_134. I'm using a QLogic 4Gb FC HBA w/ the QLT driver and
ms.
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Khushil Dep khushil@gmail.com wrote:
Set your txg_synctime_ms to 0x3000 and retest please?
On 15 Nov 2010 23:23, Louis carreir...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey all1
Recently I've decided to implement OpenSolaris as a target for
BackupExec.
The server
read c7t0d0p0, not c7t0d0p0 and c8t0d0p0 as you have in #1-4.
Typo?
--
Louis-Frédéric Feuillette jeb...@gmail.com
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
happen due to floating point
overflows and some other issues.
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arithmetic_coding
--
Louis-Frédéric Feuillette jeb...@gmail.com
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 12:34 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Louis-Frédéric Feuillette jeb...@gmail.com wrote:
I saw this question on another mailing list, and I too would like to
know. And I have a couple questions of my own.
== Paraphrased from other list ==
Does anyone have any
I did see this, Thanks.
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 10:51 -0400, Christine Tran wrote:
2009/8/14 Louis-Frédéric Feuillette jeb...@gmail.com
I am primarily interested in the theory of how to write a
filesystem.
The kernel interface comes later when I
envirionment
File Structures: An OO approach using C++
Database System concepts (More about SQL and how to implement Joins )
Thanks in advance.
--
Louis-Frédéric Feuillette jeb...@gmail.com
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
. More details are in my paper.
Is there link to this paper available?
--
Louis-Frédéric Feuillette jeb...@gmail.com
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
accurate
data.
Unrelated, what did you use to generate those graphs, they look good.
Also, do you have a hardware list on your site somewhere that I missed?
I'd like to know more about the hardware.
--
Louis-Frédéric Feuillette jeb...@gmail.com
___
zfs
in my travels?
--
Louis-Frédéric Feuillette jeb...@gmail.com
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
ZIL help?
--
Louis-Frédéric Feuillette jeb...@gmail.com
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
or is unreadable, then you can reconstruct the missing
block. In this example you would only loose 20% of your capacity not
50%.
I think this option would only really be useful for home users or simple
workstations. It also could have some performance implications.
-Jebnor
--
Louis-Frédéric
to using ditto
blocks on top of raid-z(2)?
Jebnor
--
Louis-Frédéric Feuillette jeb...@gmail.com
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
pool_name' command, (2)
shutdown, (3) insert card and move all SATA cables for drives from mobo to
card, (4) boot and issue a 'zpool import pool_name' command ?
Thanks,
Simon
http://breden.org.uk/2008/03/02/a-home-fileserver-using-zfs/
--
Louis-Frédéric Feuillette jeb...@gmail.com
types
and run different sections of code based upon what it finds?
louis
On 06/17/09 11:38, Dirk Nitschke wrote:
Hi Louis!
Solaris /usr/bin/find and Linux (GNU-) find work differently! I have
experienced dramatic runtime differences some time ago. The reason is
that Solaris find and GNU find use
the next updatedb is run.
HTH
louis
On 06/16/09 11:55, Jose Martins wrote:
Hello experts,
IHAC that wants to put more than 250 Million files on a single
mountpoint (in a directory tree with no more than 100 files on each
directory).
He wants to share such filesystem by NFS and mount it through
works without problems.
Somehow there where problems with the windows name resolution without the
restart. Maybe thats becouse I used the wins deamon before?
Greets Louis Hoefler.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
Is it possible to share a folder with cifs without adding a zfs volume?
I also have not found out how to share a folder with zfs, is it possible?
If it's possible, how?
I searched google and this forum but found no answers to my question.
Greets Louis Hoefler
PS.: I hope this was the right
But what is the recommended way to share a directory?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
?
Greets Louis Hoefler.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Ok I found a solution.
Thanks for your help.
svcadm enable samba wins swat
modified /etc/sfw/smb.conf:
[global]
server string = Unix-Windows share
security = SHARE
wins server = 192.168.1.2, 192.168.1.1
[apache22]
comment = Apache 2.2 share
path =
You probably want to share pool/home as an NFS share then mount it in
the zones. The zfs file system itself can't actually be mounted to
multiple mountpoints, its not a shared filesystem like NFS or QFS.
zfs set sharenfs=on pool/home
then in the zones
mount globalzonehost:/home /home
Where
Well, ignore my post, a kernel engineer would know. I had no idea you
could loopback mount the same filesystem into multiple zones, or am I
missing something? This would certainly be more efficient than using nfs.
Lou
James C. McPherson wrote:
Bo Granlund wrote:
Hi,
[Sorry for
24 matches
Mail list logo
