Re: [zfs-discuss] Is there a limit to snapshotting?

On 03/08/09 23:16, Blake wrote: I think it's filesystems, not snapshots, that take a long time to enumerate. (If I'm wrong, somebody correct me :) The time needed to iterate through the same number of snapshots and filesystems should be about the same. However, whenever any of the ZFS filesys

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS snapshot successfully but zfs list -r does not list the snapshot

On 03/06/09 09:53, Steven Sim wrote: Gurus; I am using OpenSolaris 2008.11 snv_101b_rc2 X86 Prior to this I was using SXCE built 91 (or thereabout) On build 91, after the command #zfs snapshot -r myplace I could easily see the snapshot using ZFS list. But after install OpenSolaris 2008.11 s

Re: [zfs-discuss] Question about zpool create parameter "version"

On 03/05/09 11:33, Richard Morris - Sun Microsystems - Burlington United States wrote: On 03/04/09 15:24, Dennis Clarke wrote: Not too sure what this option needs as a value but the man page suggests that the keywork "current" should work. ... cannot create 'fibre00'

Re: [zfs-discuss] Question about zpool create parameter "version"

On 03/04/09 15:24, Dennis Clarke wrote: Not too sure what this option needs as a value but the man page suggests that the keywork "current" should work. ... cannot create 'fibre00': bad numeric value 'current' The keyword current is not numeric and causes an issue. The zpool(1M) manpage is not

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs list extentions related to pNFS

Quick Background: The pNFS project (http://opensolaris.org/os/project/nfsv41/) is adding a new DMU object set type which is used on the pNFS data server to store pNFS stripe DMU objects. A pNFS dataset gets created with the "zfs create" command

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs list improvements?

On 01/09/09 01:44, Ross wrote: > Can I ask why we need to use -c or -d at all? We already have -r to > recursively list children, can't we add an optional depth parameter to that? > > You then have: > zfs list : shows current level (essentially -r 0) > zfs list -r : shows all levels (infinite rec

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs list improvements?

On 01/08/09 06:39, Tim Foster wrote: hi Rich, On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 10:51 -0500, Richard Morris - Sun Microsystems - Burlington United States wrote: As you point out, the -c option is user friendly while the -depth (or maybe -d) option is more general. There have been several requests for

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs list improvements?

On 01/08/09 06:28, Mike Futerko wrote: > I'd have a few more proposals how to improve zfs list if they don't > contravene the concept of zfs list command. > > Currently zfs list returns error "operation not applicable to datasets > of this type" if you try to list for ex.: "zfs list -t snapshot > f

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs list improvements?

On 01/06/09 09:07, Chris Gerhard wrote: > To improve the performance of scripts that manipulate zfs snapshots and the > zfs snapshot service in perticular there needs to be a way to list all the > snapshots for a given object and only the snapshots for that object. > > There are two RFEs filed th

Re: [zfs-discuss] `zfs list` doesn't show my snapshot

On 11/25/08 16:41, Paweł Tęcza wrote: Dnia 2008-11-25, wto o godzinie 13:11 -0500, Richard Morris - Sun Microsystems - Burlington United States pisze: Pawel, With http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6734907 "zfs list -t all would be useful once snapshots are omitted by de

Re: [zfs-discuss] `zfs list` doesn't show my snapshot

On 11/23/08 12:14, Paweł Tęcza wrote: As others here have said, just issue 'zfs list -t snapshot' if you just want to see the snapshots, or 'zfs list -t all' to see both filesystems and snapshots. OK, I can use that, but my dreamed `zfs list` syntax is like below: zfs list [all|snapshots] zfs

[zfs-discuss] Changes to default output from post S10 zfs list

This information is Copyright 2007 Sun Microsystems 1. Introduction 1.1. Project/Component Working Name: zfs list default output 1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier: Author: Rich Morris 1.3 Date of This Document: 19 October, 2007 4. Technical Description This