Is it possible to replicate the whole opensolaris site to
illumos/openindiana/smartos/omnios site in a sub-catalog as archive?
>-Original Message-
>From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org
>[mailto:zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Jim Klimov
>Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2
-backup:daily-2012-12-14-17:26 keep Fri Dec 14
17:27:39 2012
Thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
n pulling
>snapshot contents off the disks, since they're essentially random access on a
>server that's been creating/deleting snapshots for a long time.
>
>--eric
>
That is true. This discussion is assumed under ideal condition. We want to
minimize the o
>
> We have found mbuffer to be the fastest solution. Our rates for large
> transfers on 10GbE are:
>
> 280MB/smbuffer
> 220MB/srsh
> 180MB/sHPN-ssh unencrypted
> 60MB/s standard ssh
>
> The tradeoff mbuffer is a little more complicated to script; rsh is,
> well, you know;
Post in the list.
> -Original Message-
> From: Fred Liu
> Sent: 星期五, 十二月 14, 2012 23:41
> To: 'real-men-dont-cl...@gmx.net'
> Subject: RE: [zfs-discuss] any more efficient way to transfer snapshot
> between two hosts than ssh tunnel?
>
>
>
>
>
> I've heard you could, but I've never done it. Sorry I'm not much help,
> except as a cheer leader. You can do it! I think you can! Don't give
> up! heheheheh
> Please post back whatever you find, or if you have to figure it out for
> yourself, then blog about it and post that.
Aha! Gotc
me! I am thinking running two ssh services -- one normal and
one with HPN patches only for backup job.
But now sure they can work before I try them. I will also try netcat.
Many thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mai
.
Fred
From: Adrian Smith [mailto:adrian.sm...@rmit.edu.au]
Sent: 星期五, 十二月 14, 2012 12:08
To: Fred Liu
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] any more efficient way to transfer snapshot between
two hosts than ssh tunnel?
Hi Fred,
Try mbuffer (http://www.maier-komor.de
Assuming in a secure and trusted env, we want to get the maximum transfer speed
without the overhead from ssh.
Thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
ke expected dedup or compression ratios,
> and hope that your end-users would be able to stuff even
> more of their addressable data into the pool (because it
> would be sparse, compressable, and/or not unique), but
> in the end that's unpredic
level vdevs; if you are not then there's no control over which
>blocks go to which vdevs.
>
There is no specific problem to resolve. Just want to get sort of accurate
equation between
the "raw storage size" and the "usable storage size" although the *meta file*
>IIRC, the senior product architects and perhaps some engineers have
>left Oracle. A better question for your Oracle rep is whether there is a
>plan to anything other than sustaining engineering for the product.
I see.
Thanks.
Fred
__
to integrate open-sourced
SAM-QFS into illumos
or smartos/oi/illumian.
Thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
set changes (space shared between a clone and its
>origin, mirroring, raid-z, dedup[*]).
>
>--matt
>
>[*] Although dedup can be turned on and off per-dataset, the data is
>deduplicated against all dedup-enabled data in the pool. Ie, identical data in
>different datase
>The time is the creation time of the snapshots.
Yes. That is true.
Thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
>
> Still a fully supported product from Oracle:
>
> http://www.oracle.com/us/products/servers-storage/storage/storage-
> software/qfs-software/overview/index.html
>
Yeah. But it seems no more updates since sun acquisition.
Don't know Oracle's roadmap in aspect o
>On Apr 26, 2012, at 12:27 AM, Fred Liu wrote:
>"zfs 'userused@' properties" and "'zfs userspace' command" are good enough to
>gather usage statistics.
>I think I mix that with NetApp. If my memory is correct, we have to set quotas
>to ge
The subject says it all.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
>On 2012-04-26 11:27, Fred Liu wrote:
>> "zfs 'userused@' properties" and "'zfs userspace' command" are good
>> enough to gather usage statistics.
>...
>> Since no one is focusing on enabling default user/group quota now, th
>
>2012/4/26 Fred Liu
>
>Currently, dedup/compression is pool-based right now, they don't have the
>granularity on file system or user or group level. There is also a lot of
>improving space in this aspect.
>
>Compression is not pool-based, you can control it with t
t.
Currently, dedup/compression is pool-based right now, they don’t have the
granularity on file system or user or group level. There is also a lot of
improving space in this aspect.
Thanks.
Fred
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org
[mailto:zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Ri
I jump into this loop with different alternative -- ip-based block device.
And I saw few successful cases with "HAST + UCARP + ZFS + FreeBSD".
If zfsonlinux is robust enough, trying "DRBD + PACEMAKER + ZFS + LINUX" is
definitely encouraged.
Thanks.
Fred
> -Original M
it possible to do it
> without setting
> such quotas?
>
>Thanks.
>
>Fred
>
_____
From: Fred Liu
Sent: 星期三, 四月 25, 2012 20:05
To: develo...@lists.illumos.org
Cc: 'zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org'
Subject: RE: [developer] Setting defau
On Apr 24, 2012, at 2:50 PM, Fred Liu wrote:
Yes.
Thanks.
I am not aware of anyone looking into this.
I don't think it is very hard, per se. But such quotas don't fit well with the
notion of many file systems. There might be some restricted use cases
where it makes good sense, b
-Original Message-
From: Fred Liu
Sent: 星期二, 四月 24, 2012 11:41
To: develo...@lists.illumos.org
Subject: Setting default user/group quotas?
It seems this feature is still not there yet. Any plan to do it? Or is it hard
to do it?
Thanks.
Fred
Looks really beautiful...
> -Original Message-
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of David Magda
> Sent: 星期二, 一月 17, 2012 8:06
> To: zfs-discuss
> Subject: [zfs-discuss] Windows 8 ReFS (OT)
>
> Kind of off topic, but I fig
>
> ... so when will zfs-related improvement make it to solaris-
> derivatives :D ?
>
I am also very curious about Oracle's policy about source code. ;-)
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mai
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
e little
> impact if an errant command were issued. I'd never do that in
> production without some form of I/O fencing in place.
>
I also have that habit. And It is good practice to bear in mind.
Thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss m
Paul,
Thanks.
I understand now.
Fred
> -Original Message-
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Paul Kraus
> Sent: 星期一, 十月 24, 2011 22:38
> To: ZFS Discussions
> Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] FS Reli
> 3. Do NOT let a system see drives with more than one OS zpool at the
> same time (I know you _can_ do this safely, but I have seen too many
> horror stories on this list that I just avoid it).
>
Can you elaborate #3? In what situation will it happen?
T
0 0
c4t500151795910D221d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0
errors: No known data errors
Thanks.
Fred
From: Fred Liu
Sent: 星期二, 九月 20, 2011 9:23
To: Tony Kim; 'Richard Elling'
Subject: all the history
Hi,
Following is the history:
The whole history is I found a ZIL dev
LABEL 2
failed to unpack label 2
LABEL 3
failed to unpack label 3
> -Original Message-
> From: Fred Liu
> Sent: 星期二, 九月 20,
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Elling [mailto:richard.ell...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 星期二, 九月 20, 2011 3:57
> To: Fred Liu
> Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] remove wrongly added device from zpool
>
> more below…
>
> On Sep
-
failed to unpack label 2
LABEL 3
failed to unpack label 3
c22t2d0 and c22t3d0 are the devices I physically removed and connected back to
the server.
How can I fix them?
Thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
ool first?
Can you give more details about #2 -- " Build the vdev tree by hand and look to
see which disk is missing"?
Thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
/pci15d9,400@1f,2/disk@5,0
> -Original Message-
> From: Fred Liu
> Sent: 星期一, 九月 19, 2011 23:35
> To: Fred Liu; Richard Elling
> Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Subject: RE: [zfs-discuss] remove wrongly added device from zpool
>
> I get some good progress like foll
c22t5d0 ONLINE
Additional devices are known to be part of this pool, though their
exact configuration cannot be determined.
Any suggestions?
Thanks.
Fred
> -Original Message-
> From: Fred Liu
> Sent: 星期一, 九月 19, 2011 22:28
> To: 'Richard
I used zpool add -f.
Thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
I use opensolaris b134.
Thanks.
Fred
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Elling [mailto:richard.ell...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 星期一, 九月 19, 2011 22:21
> To: Fred Liu
> Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] remove wrongly added device from zpool
>
100% done: 1041082 pages dumped, dump succeeded
rebooting...
> -Original Message-
> From: Fred Liu
> Sent: 星期一, 九月 19, 2011 22:00
> To: Fred Liu; 'Edward Ned Harvey'
I also used zpool import -fFX cn03 in b134 and b151a(via live SX11 live cd). It
resulted a core dump and reboot after about 15 min.
I can see all the leds are blinking on the HDD within this 15 min.
Can replacing empty ZIL devices help?
Thanks.
Fred
> -Original Message-
> From
80 108497608 1% /var/run
rpool/export 4686423 46841 1% /export
rpool/export/home4686423 46841 1% /export/home
rpool/export/home/fred
>
> So... You accidentally added non-redundant disks to a pool. They were
> not
> part of the raidz2, so the redundancy in the raidz2 did not help you.
> You
> removed the non-redundant disks, and now the pool is faulted.
>
> The only thing you can do is:
> Add the disks back to the pool (re-in
>
> You can add mirrors to those lonely disks.
>
Can it repair the pool?
Thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
I want to use zpool import -F to fix it.
But now I get " one or more devices is currently unavailable Destroy
and re-create the pool from a backup source."
I use opensolaris b134 and zpool version 22.
Thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
dded devices for I though raidz2 can afford it.
But now the whole pool corrupts. I don't know where I can go ...
Any help will be tremendously appreciated.
Thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Hi,
For my carelessness, I added two disks into a raid-z2 zpool as normal data
disk, but in fact
I want to make them as zil devices.
Any remedy solutions?
Many thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
& drive, backup
software & network) which needs magnitude like T1C grade is a monster. It
seems encryption
is not integrated into NDMP protocol stack.
Thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.
t; is you are trying to protect against and what transport layer is.
>
> But basically it is not provided by ZFS itself it is up to the person
> building the system to secure the transport layer used for ZFS send.
>
> It could also be write directly to a T10k encrypting tape drive.
&
do
decompression and decryption? Thanks.
> > And ZFS send/receive tunneled by ssh becomes the only way to encrypt
> the data transmission?
>
> That isn't the only way.
>
>
> --
Any alternatives, if you don't mind? ;-)
Thanks.
Fred
_
ssh becomes the only way to encrypt the data
transmission?
Thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
> -Original Message-
> From: David Magda [mailto:dma...@ee.ryerson.ca]
> Sent: 星期二, 六月 28, 2011 10:41
> To: Fred Liu
> Cc: Bill Sommerfeld; ZFS Discuss
> Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Encryption accelerator card
> recommendations.[GPU acceleration of ZFS]
>
>
:44, Hung-Sheng Tsao (LaoTsao) Ph. D. wrote:
>
> IMHO, zfs need to run in all kind of HW T-series CMT server that can
> help sha calculation since T1 day, did not see any work in ZFS to take
> advantage it
That support would be in the crypto framework though, not ZFS per se. So I
t
ion using
> commercial, off-the-shelf (COTS) components, then that is far beyond
> what can be easily
> said in a forum posting.
> -- richard
Yeah. High availability is another topic which has more technical challenges.
Anyway, thank you very much.
Fred
_
> -Original Message-
> From: Fred Liu
> Sent: 星期四, 六月 16, 2011 17:28
> To: Fred Liu; 'Richard Elling'
> Cc: 'Jim Klimov'; 'zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org'
> Subject: RE: [zfs-discuss] zfs global hot spares?
>
> Fixing a typo in my las
Fixing a typo in my last thread...
> -Original Message-
> From: Fred Liu
> Sent: 星期四, 六月 16, 2011 17:22
> To: 'Richard Elling'
> Cc: Jim Klimov; zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Subject: RE: [zfs-discuss] zfs global hot spares?
>
> > This message is f
scsi reset storm will happen?
How can we be immune to this so as not to avoid interrupting the file service?
Thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
T** be due to the degraded zpool although one
broken disk is almost the only **obvious** event in the night.
I will add a hot spare and enable autoreplace to see if it will happen again.
Thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Elling [mailto:richard.ell...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 星期三, 六月 15, 2011 14:25
> To: Fred Liu
> Cc: Jim Klimov; zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs global hot spares?
>
> On Jun 14, 2011, at
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Elling [mailto:richard.ell...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 星期三, 六月 15, 2011 11:59
> To: Fred Liu
> Cc: Jim Klimov; zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs global hot spares?
>
> On Jun 14, 2011, at 2:36 PM, Fred L
Hi,
Anyone who is successfully poll the zpool/zfs properties thrun SNMP?
Thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
I assume the history is stored in the meta data. Is it possible to configure
how long/much history can be stored/displayed?
I know it is doable via external/additional automation like porting to a
database.
Thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
What is the difference between warm spares and hot spares?
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Hi,
We have met this yesterday. The degraded pool was exported and I had to
re-import it manually.
Is it a normal case? I assume it should not be but
Has anyone met the similar case?
Thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss
Just want to share with you. We have found and been suffering from some weird
issues because of
it. It is better to connect them directly to the sata ports on the mainboard.
Thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
-Original Message-
From: Erik Trimble [mailto:erik.trim...@oracle.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 1:06 AM
To: Fred Liu
Cc: Ian Collins; ZFS discuss
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] How does ZFS dedup space accounting work with quota?
On 4/26/2011 9:29 AM, Fred Liu wrote:
> From: E
-Original Message-
From: Erik Trimble [mailto:erik.trim...@oracle.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 12:07 AM
To: Fred Liu
Cc: Ian Collins; ZFS discuss
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] How does ZFS dedup space accounting work with quota?
On 4/26/2011 3:59 AM, Fred Liu wrote
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Trimble [mailto:erik.trim...@oracle.com]
> Sent: 星期二, 四月 26, 2011 12:47
> To: Ian Collins
> Cc: Fred Liu; ZFS discuss
> Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] How does ZFS dedup space accounting work
> with quota?
>
> On 4/25/2011
H, it seems dedup is pool-based not filesystem-based.
If it can have fine-grained granularity(like based on fs), that will be great!
It is pity! NetApp is sweet in this aspect.
Thanks.
Fred
> -Original Message-
> From: Brandon High [mailto:bh...@freaks.com]
> Sent: 星期二, 四月
d will not
provide accurate space accounting."
So how can I set the quota size on a file system with dedup enabled?
Thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Thanks.
But does noacal work with nfs v3?
Thanks.
Fred
> -Original Message-
> From: Cameron Hanover [mailto:chano...@umich.edu]
> Sent: 星期四, 三月 17, 2011 1:34
> To: Fred Liu
> Cc: ZFS Discussions
> Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] GNU 'cp -p' can't work well wit
Probably, we need place a tag before zfs -- Opensource-ZFS or Oracle-ZFS after
Solaris11 release.
If it is true, these two ZFSes will definitely evolve into different directions.
BTW, Did Oracle unveil the actual release date? We are also at the cross
road...
Thanks.
Fred
> -Origi
Sorry. I put post in cc.
I use NFSv3(linux 2.4 kernel) coreutils-8.9.
Thanks.
Fred
-Original Message-
From: David Magda [mailto:dma...@ee.ryerson.ca]
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 10:29 PM
To: Fred Liu
Cc: ZFS Discussions
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] GNU 'cp -p' can't
Yeah. But we are on Linux NFS client. ;-(
Is it doable to build SUN cp in Linux? Where can I find the source code?
Thanks.
Fred
-Original Message-
From: jason.brian.k...@gmail.com [mailto:jason.brian.k...@gmail.com] On Behalf
Of Jason
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 10:06 PM
To: Fred
It is from ZFS ACL.
Thanks.
Fred
From: Fred Liu
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 9:57 PM
To: ZFS Discussions
Subject: GNU 'cp -p' can't work well with ZFS-based-NFS
Always show info like 'operation not supported'.
Any w
Always show info like 'operation not supported'.
Any workaround?
Thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Tim,
Thanks.
Is there a mapping mechanism like what DataOnTap does to map the permission/acl
between NIS/LDAP and AD?
Thanks.
Fred
From: Tim Cook [mailto:t...@cook.ms]
Sent: 星期日, 三月 13, 2011 9:53
To: Fred Liu
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] dual protocal on one
Hi,
Is it possible to run both CIFS and NFS on one file system over ZFS?
Thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
fline"...When I installed the
kernel patch 142900-17 (with reconfigure reboot), I was surprise to see the
rpool in resilvering and disk's online state after "boot -r". Is this
strange behavior or not ?? What's happened ?
Thanks in advance
Fred
Hi,
Has anyone met this?
I meet this every time just like somebody steps on brake paddle suddenly and
release it in the car.
Thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs
Khushil,
Thanks.
Fred
From: Khushil Dep [mailto:khushil@gmail.com]
Sent: 星期一, 一月 31, 2011 17:37
To: Fred Liu
Cc: Rocky Shek; Pasi Kärkkäinen; Philip Brown; zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] reliable, enterprise worthy JBODs?
You should also check out VA Technologies
Rocky,
Can individuals buy your products in the retail market?
Thanks.
Fred
> -Original Message-
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Rocky Shek
> Sent: 星期五, 一月 28, 2011 7:02
> To: 'Pasi Kärkkäinen&
Well, in this case, the rsync sent data is about the size of the "USED" column
in "zfs list -t snapshot" while the zfs stream is 4 times bigger. Also, with
rsync, if it fails in the middle, i don't have to start over.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
__
Thanks for this explanation
So there is no real way to estimate the size of the increment?
Anyway, for this particular filesystem, i'll stick with rsync and yes, the
difference was 50G!
Thanks
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-disc
No compression, no dedup.
I also forgot to mention it's on svn_134
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Hello,
I'm having a weird issue with my incremental setup.
Here is the filesystem as it shows up with zfs list:
NAMEUSED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
Data/FS1 771M 16.1T 116M /Data/FS1
Data/f...@05 10.3G - 1.93T
I do the same with ACARD…
Works well enough.
Fred
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org
[mailto:zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Jason Warr
Sent: 星期四, 十二月 30, 2010 8:56
To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] SAS/short stroking vs. SSDs for ZIL
ACARD 9010 is good enough in this aspect, if you DON'T need extremely high
IOPS...
Sorry for the typo.
Fred
> -Original Message-
> From: Fred Liu
> Sent: 星期四, 十二月 23, 2010 15:30
> To: 'Erik Trimble'; Christopher George
> Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.o
ACARD 9010 is good enough in this aspect, if you need extremely high iops...
Fred
> -Original Message-
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Erik Trimble
> Sent: 星期四, 十二月 23, 2010 14:36
> To: Christopher G
Failed zil devices will also cause this...
Fred
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org
[mailto:zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Wolfram Tomalla
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 10:40 PM
To: Frank Van Damme
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] very
needs UEFI not the traditional BIOS and OS support.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Hi,
Anyone who has experience with 3TB HDD in ZFS? Can solaris recognize this new
HDD?
Thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Hi,
Anyone who has the experience of Texas Memory Systems's RamSan in ZFS?
Thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Sure. Gotcha! ^:^
> -Original Message-
> From: James C. McPherson [mailto:j...@opensolaris.org]
> Sent: 星期四, 十一月 18, 2010 13:16
> To: Fred Liu
> Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] WarpDrive SLP-300
>
> On 18/11/10 03:05 PM, Fred Liu wr
Yeah, no driver issue.
BTW, any new storage-controller-related drivers introduced in snv151a?
LSI seems the only one who works very closely with Oracle/Sun.
Thanks.
Fred
> -Original Message-
> From: James C. McPherson [mailto:j...@opensolaris.org]
> Sent: 星期四, 十一月 18, 2010 1
http://www.lsi.com/channel/about_channel/whatsnew/warpdrive_slp300/index.html
Good stuff for ZFS.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
I get the answer: -p.
> -Original Message-
> From: Fred Liu
> Sent: 星期六, 八月 28, 2010 9:00
> To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Subject: get quota showed in precision of byte?
>
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to do "zfs get -??? quota file
Hi,
Is it possible to do "zfs get -??? quota filesystem" ?
Thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
default
cn03/3 dedup offdefault
cn03/3 mlslabel none default
cn03/3 com.sun:auto-snapshot true inherited from cn03
Thanks.
Fred
From: Thomas Burgess [mailto:wonsl...@gmail.com]
Sent: 星期五, 八月
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
