Re: [zfs-discuss] NexentaStor 3.0.3 vs OpenSolaris - Patches more up to date?

2010-07-06 Thread Giovanni Tirloni
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Spandana Goli wrote: > Release Notes information: > If there are new features, each release is added to > http://www.nexenta.com/corp/documentation/release-notes-support. > > If just bug fixes, then the Changelog listing is updated: > http://www.nexenta.com/corp/doc

Re: [zfs-discuss] NexentaStor 3.0.3 vs OpenSolaris - Patches more up to date?

2010-07-06 Thread Spandana Goli
Release Notes information: If there are new features, each release is added to http://www.nexenta.com/corp/documentation/release-notes-support. If just bug fixes, then the Changelog listing is updated: http://www.nexenta.com/corp/documentation/nexentastor-changelog Regards, Spandana

Re: [zfs-discuss] NexentaStor 3.0.3 vs OpenSolaris - Patches more up to date?

2010-07-05 Thread Erast
In 3.0.3+ new option would list appliance changelog going forward: nmc$ show version -c On 07/04/2010 05:58 PM, Bohdan Tashchuk wrote: Where can I find a list of these? This leads to the more generic question of: where are *any* release notes? I saw on Genunix that Community Edition 3.0.3 wa

Re: [zfs-discuss] NexentaStor 3.0.3 vs OpenSolaris - Patches more up to date?

2010-07-04 Thread Bohdan Tashchuk
> Where can I find a list of these? This leads to the more generic question of: where are *any* release notes? I saw on Genunix that Community Edition 3.0.3 was replaced by 3.0.3-1. What changed? I went to nexenta.org and looked around. But it wasn't immediately obvious where to find release n

Re: [zfs-discuss] NexentaStor 3.0.3 vs OpenSolaris - Patches more up to date?

2010-07-04 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
- Original Message - > Compared to b134? Yes! We have fixed many bugs that still exist in > 134. Where can I find a list of these? Vennlige hilsener / Best regards roy -- Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk (+47) 97542685 r...@karlsbakk.net http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/ -- I all pedagogikk er det essensi

Re: [zfs-discuss] NexentaStor 3.0.3 vs OpenSolaris - Patches more up to date?

2010-07-04 Thread Garrett D'Amore
Compared to b134? Yes! We have fixed many bugs that still exist in 134. "Fajar A. Nugraha" wrote: >On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Garrett D'Amore wrote: >> I am sorry you feel that way.  I will look at your issue as soon as I am >> able, but I should say that it is almost certain that what

Re: [zfs-discuss] NexentaStor 3.0.3 vs OpenSolaris - Patches more up to date?

2010-07-04 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Garrett D'Amore wrote: > I am sorry you feel that way.  I will look at your issue as soon as I am > able, but I should say that it is almost certain that whatever the problem > is, it probably is inherited from OpenSolaris and the build of NCP you were > testing

Re: [zfs-discuss] NexentaStor 3.0.3 vs OpenSolaris - Patches more up to date?

2010-07-03 Thread Garrett D'Amore
I am sorry you feel that way. I will look at your issue as soon as I am able, but I should say that it is almost certain that whatever the problem is, it probably is inherited from OpenSolaris and the build of NCP you were testing was indeed not the final release so some issues are not entirely

Re: [zfs-discuss] NexentaStor 3.0.3 vs OpenSolaris - Patches more up to date?

2010-07-02 Thread Tim Cook
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 9:55 PM, James C. McPherson wrote: > On 3/07/10 12:25 PM, Richard Elling wrote: > >> On Jul 2, 2010, at 6:48 PM, Tim Cook wrote: >> >>> Given that the most basic of functionality was broken in Nexenta, and not >>> Opensolaris, and I couldn't get a single response, I have a

Re: [zfs-discuss] NexentaStor 3.0.3 vs OpenSolaris - Patches more up to date?

2010-07-02 Thread James C. McPherson
On 3/07/10 12:25 PM, Richard Elling wrote: On Jul 2, 2010, at 6:48 PM, Tim Cook wrote: Given that the most basic of functionality was broken in Nexenta, and not Opensolaris, and I couldn't get a single response, I have a hard time recommending ANYONE go to Nexenta. It's great they're employi

Re: [zfs-discuss] NexentaStor 3.0.3 vs OpenSolaris - Patches more up to date?

2010-07-02 Thread Tim Cook
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Richard Elling wrote: > On Jul 2, 2010, at 6:48 PM, Tim Cook wrote: > > Given that the most basic of functionality was broken in Nexenta, and not > Opensolaris, and I couldn't get a single response, I have a hard time > recommending ANYONE go to Nexenta. It's grea

Re: [zfs-discuss] NexentaStor 3.0.3 vs OpenSolaris - Patches more up to date?

2010-07-02 Thread Richard Elling
On Jul 2, 2010, at 6:48 PM, Tim Cook wrote: > Given that the most basic of functionality was broken in Nexenta, and not > Opensolaris, and I couldn't get a single response, I have a hard time > recommending ANYONE go to Nexenta. It's great they're employing you now, but > the community edition

Re: [zfs-discuss] NexentaStor 3.0.3 vs OpenSolaris - Patches more up to date?

2010-07-02 Thread Tim Cook
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 8:06 PM, Richard Elling wrote: > On Jul 2, 2010, at 12:53 PM, Steve Radich, BitShop, Inc. wrote: > > > I see in NexentaStor's announcement of Community Edition 3.0.3 they > mention some backported patches in this release. > > Yes. These patches are in the code tree, curren

Re: [zfs-discuss] NexentaStor 3.0.3 vs OpenSolaris - Patches more up to date?

2010-07-02 Thread Richard Elling
On Jul 2, 2010, at 12:53 PM, Steve Radich, BitShop, Inc. wrote: > I see in NexentaStor's announcement of Community Edition 3.0.3 they mention > some backported patches in this release. Yes. These patches are in the code tree, currently at b143 (~18 weeks newer than b134) > Aside from their man

[zfs-discuss] NexentaStor 3.0.3 vs OpenSolaris - Patches more up to date?

2010-07-02 Thread Steve Radich, BitShop, Inc.
I see in NexentaStor's announcement of Community Edition 3.0.3 they mention some backported patches in this release. Aside from their management features / UI what is the core OS difference if we move to Nexenta from OpenSolaris b134? These DeDup bugs are my main frustration - if a staff membe