Ian Collins i...@ianshome.com wrote:
But they are involved in the discussions around which features should be
there, and help to prioritise those features.
I guess my fear is the external ZFS developers have adopted the Oracle
rather than the OpenSolaris development model. We all know
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Ian Collins i...@ianshome.com wrote:
On 04/10/11 09:25 AM, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
Right. And in the real world, customers are generally not involved with
architectural discussions of products. Their input is collected and
feed into the process, but they
-discuss] ZFS Going forward after Oracle - Let's get
organized, let's get started.
I glance at the list after years of neglect (selfishly...after almost losing my
pool), and see stuff like this: shady backroom irc-kiddie bullshit. please:
names, mailing lists, urls, hg servers. Many of us have
On 04/10/11 05:41 AM, Chris Forgeron wrote:
I see your point, but you also have to understand that sometimes too many
helpers/opinions are a bad thing. There is a set core of ZFS developers who
make a lot of this move forward, and they are the key right now. The rest of us will just
muddy
On 04/10/11 09:25 AM, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 08:56 +1200, Ian Collins wrote:
On 04/10/11 05:41 AM, Chris Forgeron wrote:
I see your point, but you also have to understand that sometimes too many
helpers/opinions are a bad thing. There is a set core of ZFS developers
On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 08:56 +1200, Ian Collins wrote:
On 04/10/11 05:41 AM, Chris Forgeron wrote:
I see your point, but you also have to understand that sometimes too many
helpers/opinions are a bad thing. There is a set core of ZFS developers
who make a lot of this move forward, and
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Chris Forgeron cforge...@acsi.ca wrote:
I see your point, but you also have to understand that sometimes too many
helpers/opinions are a bad thing. There is a set core of ZFS developers
who make a lot of this move forward, and they are the key right now. The
On Sat, 9 Apr 2011, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
Right. And in the real world, customers are generally not involved with
architectural discussions of products. Their input is collected and
feed into the process, but they don't get to sit at the whiteboard with
developers as the work on the designs.
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Garrett D'Amore garr...@nexenta.com wrote:
On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 08:56 +1200, Ian Collins wrote:
On 04/10/11 05:41 AM, Chris Forgeron wrote:
I see your point, but you also have to understand that sometimes too
many helpers/opinions are a bad thing. There is
js == Joerg Schilling joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de writes:
js This is interesting. Where is this group hosted?
+1
I glance at the list after years of neglect (selfishly...after almost
losing my pool), and see stuff like this: shady backroom irc-kiddie
bullshit. please: names,
Ah, that's all I really need to know. I expected it to be public, but I
completely understand the need to keep it private so it can move forward
properly. This should hopefully provide enough record for other ZFS
well-wishers who are searching for signs of post-Oracle development.
Richard Elling richard.ell...@gmail.com wrote:
The feeling I get is that while there is plenty of userland work being
done, there is next to nothing on ZFS development outside of the Oracle
camp.
There is an active ZFS working group where many people contributing code to
the core
ZFS
There is ZFS development happening outside of Oracle. Many of the
active ZFS developers at a *variety* of organizations are collaborating
within the illumos community using a private e-mail list much like an
standards body Working Group (we even call ourselves the ZFS Working
Group). And not all
I'm curious where ZFS development is going.
I've been reading through the lists, and watching Oracle, Nexenta, Illumos, and
OpenIndiana for signs of life.
The feeling I get is that while there is plenty of userland work being done,
there is next to nothing on ZFS development outside of the
On Mar 25, 2011, at 12:17 PM, Chris Forgeron wrote:
I’m curious where ZFS development is going.
Forward :-)
I’ve been reading through the lists, and watching Oracle, Nexenta, Illumos,
and OpenIndiana for signs of life.
The feeling I get is that while there is plenty of userland work
15 matches
Mail list logo
