I agree whole heartedly! Sincerely,
David Ellis Systems Engineer Tecnomatix - Unicam Inc. Two International Drive - Suite 150 http://www.tecnomatix-unicam.com 603.766.9664 Tel (Direct) 603.765.3341 Mobile 603.431.9516 Fax -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 2:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: RE: Security for new small company I think that the better solution for your issue are CheckPoint and Cisco solution, because these solutions are scalable, manageable and most"known" in the market today. If in the future you want to host the website and the mail server you must implement a solution like that. Try to get an evaluation copy of Firewall-1 or Cisco Pix (506 or 515R) with some vendor and do some labs with it. Best regards. Kleber Burt0n <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Hi, > >I must admit i did wonder about a watchguard or sonicwall. Are these products seen as being adequate though? > >Thanks > >Ben > > >On Thu, 10 January 2002, Kleber S Oliveira wrote: > >> Subject: RE: Security for new small company >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ben), [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kleber S Oliveira) >> Received: (cpmta 19170 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2002 10:45:36 -0800 >> Received: from 64.12.136.164 (HELO imo-m09.mx.aol.com) >> by smtp.c016.snv.cp.net (209.228.33.196) with SMTP; 10 Jan 2002 10:45:36 -0800 >> Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> by imo-m09.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.9.) id l.5.2b511fe (16225); >> Thu, 10 Jan 2002 13:45:31 -0500 (EST) >> Received: from >> netscape.com (mow-m02.webmail.aol.com [64.12.184.130]) by air-in02.mx.aol.com (v82.22) with ESMTP id MAILININ21-0110134531; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 13:45:31 -0500 >> Content-Length: 1511 >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 >> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> X-Received: 10 Jan 2002 18:45:36 GMT >> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 13:45:31 -0500 >> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> X-Mailer: Atlas Mailer 1.0 >> >> Hello Ben, >> >> You could buy Watchguard (SOHO) or Cisco PIX (506). These fw are for small companies or branch offices that have small throughput. >> >> But if you want to create a DMZ with the mail server and website you could buy a Cisco PIX 515R that has three or more ethernet interfaces to do it. This solution is better and more scalable. >> >> Any doubts don't hesitate to ask. >> >> Regards >> >> Kleber >> >> Ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > >> > >> >Hi, >> > >> >I work for a new small company, and have been >> >asked to look into security with regard to our LAN and >> >web connection. I am from a technical background >> >but could do with some advice in the security area. >> > >> >Our LAN is a w2k domain with 10 clients all running >> >win2k. We are going to have a DSL connection put in >> >soon and i'm thinking about firewalls and >> >server 'locking down'. >> > >> >Ideally we would like a hardware soloution for the >> >firewall, at present our website + email is with a >> >hosting company. Within 12-18 months though this >> >may change to hosting the site + email ourselves. >> > >> >Could anybody recommend firewalls/security >> >products - and what ever soloution we go for what >> >must they be able to do? >> > >> >Many thanks >> > >> >Ben >> > >> -- >> >> >> >> >> __________________________________________________________________ >> Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. Experience the convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape! http://shopnow.netscape.com/ >> >> Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/ > > >Find the best deals on the web at AltaVista Shopping! >http://www.shopping.altavista.com > -- __________________________________________________________________ Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. Experience the convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape! http://shopnow.netscape.com/ Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/
