how about you take whatever webserver you fancy, and throw a *nix firewall in front of it ? :)
Corio, Jim wrote: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >I would say that you should run the web server on the Operating system >that you are most familiar with in an environment that you are most >familiar with. If you are a Windows administrator, then you will run >the risk of misconfiguring a UNIX box and Apache when you make the >move. > >One of the biggest failures in web site security is that you have to >maintain both a system and an application and that is where most >website exploitations happen is that they do one and not the other. >Run the application on the OS that you are familiar with (and can take >the steps to secure). > >Jimmy > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Mario Behring [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 9:25 AM >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: NT/2000 vs Unix based Web Servers >> >> >>Hi list, >> >>I have some websites running on Microsoft IIS on NT/2000 servers and >> >> >I > > >>have to justify a possible change to Unix servers running Apache or >>IPlanet using CORBA. The reason is only one, more secure web >>servers and >>more secure web sites. >> >>Can you guys give me your opinion and some arguments whether >>should I do >>this change or not ?? Costs are not an issue here, please give me >>technical and security arguments. >> >>Thanks in advance. >> >>Mario Behring >> >> >> >> >> >>__________________________________________________ >>Do You Yahoo!? >>Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free >>http://sbc.yahoo.com >> >> >> > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >Version: PGP 6.5 > >iQA/AwUBPSt+10Zk4thJjdFAEQKF8ACdGeRASTaag4cxFcJa3mofQS8xgvUAnRbq >Cf6N7bUS7RC4GAlNUjQ1rT+j >=KkrZ >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >
