On Thu, 29 Oct 2020 16:01:19 GMT, Christoph Langer <clan...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> > Did you have a benchmark with various cache sizes (for example, from 1 to > > 10K) and various connections (for example from 1 to 10K) for those > > components (including TLS implementation) that use Cache? > > Nope, we've just seen the memory regression in a certain customer use case > (lot's of meory retained by a finalizer) and confirmed it resolved after > setting javax.net.ssl.sessionCacheSize to 0. > Did you have this patch checked with the customer? I think the performance may be similar or improved comparing to set the cache size to 0. > But I guess this change merits certain further benchmarking to get it right. > It looks good to me, but we may be more confident with it if there is a benchmarking. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/937
