Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> One of my notes points to a JMS (ActiveMQ) based spoolmanager.
Yes, I've looked at ActiveMQ, ActiveCluster and ActiveSpaces. But I don't
think that this change is a simple drop-in, and I would be concerned about
performance and reliability. Not that the code is bad, but the integration
seems riskier for a short term change. It also seems orthogonal to a change
that uses one thread blocking for the event, and the rest are workers.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
