What we're really interested in here is being able to comit designed
tests before we commit the code which passes the test.
IMO that *is* TDD

What we're up against is the knowedge that some of the passes are a
low priority, and not critical enough to prevent others from working
on other aspects of James.

What we really want to do is to report against our designed tests, and
improve the pass rate, rather than naievly seek 100% pass rate at all
times.

I like the idea of having two test suites.

We could have mandatory-tests and optional-tests, the first halts on
failure, the second doesn't.

When an option test can be passed by James it is moved into mandatory,
so that any future changes continue to pass.

WDYT?

d

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to