Stefano Bagnara schrieb:
> Joachim Draeger wrote:
>> Am Dienstag, den 14.11.2006, 13:27 +0100 schrieb Stefano Bagnara:
>>
>>> This *is* what "started the flames". Imho it has been a good
>>> procedure and I (by mistake) thought we all agree that tests have to
>>> pass before committing and if they fail it is a mistake of the
>>> committer (to be reverted or to be workarounded until fixed).
>>
>> Sorry, I didn't want to start any flames and I don't think that you were
>> wrong believing that a committer should run the tests before committing.
>>
>> Joachim
>
> Sorry to you, I don't think *you* started the flame, I think we all
> started a discussion that doesn't worth the time (imho).
>
> If after this full thread someone feel this is not a good practice
> (and feel others think the same) just make a proposal to be voted.
>
> I will do the same if I'll see more long time failing tests in the
> repository.
>
> Stefano
>
Im at the moment a bit busy in follow the mailinglist :-( So please if
anyone want to change it , follow Stefano's suggestion and start a VOTE ..

bye
Norman




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to