Hi, > 4. The majority of the classes will use openjpa classes: instead of > moving them all to org.apache.james.imap.jpa.mail.model.openjpa package, > we leave them and we rename this package to > org.apache.james.imap.jpa.mail.model.streaming to reflect that it goes > on "streaming the blobs". With OpenJPA you can still choose whether to use streaming, right? Because some databases don't support it. I think we should make streaming the default.
> The definition of an alternate JPA provider should not clash with the > proprietary extensions (still need to test it). However, the usage of another JPA provider would result in a different database scheme, doesn't it? We could add implementations for a the other two providers you mentioned. Best Tim --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
