At least we would not be able to add a implementation for Hibernate.. Its LGPL which is not compatible with ASL2.
Bye, Norman 2010/6/24 Tim-Christian Mundt <d...@tim-erwin.de>: > Hi, > >> 4. The majority of the classes will use openjpa classes: instead of >> moving them all to org.apache.james.imap.jpa.mail.model.openjpa package, >> we leave them and we rename this package to >> org.apache.james.imap.jpa.mail.model.streaming to reflect that it goes >> on "streaming the blobs". > With OpenJPA you can still choose whether to use streaming, right? > Because some databases don't support it. I think we should make > streaming the default. > >> The definition of an alternate JPA provider should not clash with the >> proprietary extensions (still need to test it). > However, the usage of another JPA provider would result in a different > database scheme, doesn't it? We could add implementations for a the > other two providers you mentioned. > > Best > Tim > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
