Hey,
> I'm also happy with OpenJPA and using its proprietary annotations (not > classes) doesn't prohibit a developer/deployer to define another JPA > provider. Right. > What about : > - @ElementJoinColumn ? > - @Index ? I'd support those. > - rename 'openjpa' package to 'streaming' ? We already have a streaming package and there is both streaming and non-streaming for OpenJPA, so why rename the package? Maybe I haven't fully understood your point. > I will be off for 2 weeks and won't probably be able to continue the > conversation. Hope I may say "Happy vacations" :) Best Tim --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
