Ok so to come to some consequence here.. Let us just use the openjpa annotation stuff.. If we really want to support other JPA implementations we could handle it later..
Bye, Norman 2010/6/25 Tim-Christian Mundt <d...@tim-erwin.de>: > Hey, > > >> I'm also happy with OpenJPA and using its proprietary annotations (not >> classes) doesn't prohibit a developer/deployer to define another JPA >> provider. > Right. > >> What about : >> - @ElementJoinColumn ? >> - @Index ? > I'd support those. > >> - rename 'openjpa' package to 'streaming' ? > We already have a streaming package and there is both streaming and > non-streaming for OpenJPA, so why rename the package? Maybe I haven't > fully understood your point. > >> I will be off for 2 weeks and won't probably be able to continue the >> conversation. > Hope I may say "Happy vacations" :) > > Best > Tim > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
