i think its not worth it only bacause in future if james bump java to 25+ there no way for xodus still be working :c sorry to wasting you time... but i still try youtrackdb https://github.com/JetBrains/youtrackdb - database which used now instead of xodus.
пн, 5 окт. 2026 г. в 12:24, Ilya Terskov <[email protected]>: > Thanks Rene! > > here is PR POC > > https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/3231 > > пн, 5 окт. 2026 г. в 09:25, Rene Cordier <[email protected]>: > >> Hi Ilya, >> >> I personally don't know Xodus at all. >> >> I would say if you can propose a POC that separates well Xodus implem >> into its own modules without impacting much the rest of the code it's >> maybe ok having a look and discussing around it. >> >> The more we add components support to James the moire we need time and >> energy to keep maintaining everything though keep in mind. >> >> Rene. >> >> On 10/4/26 22:25, Ilya Terskov wrote: >> > Hi there once again. >> > >> > I am little update build. I know its will adds complexity if added to >> > master but i think its good option vs jpa-app which now mostly >> deprecated >> > and not more main point of development. I am personaly want hard test it >> > and support as i can. >> > For now in my repo its uses in memory spooler (because activemq -> >> artemis >> > transition time) also for simplicity i make metadata and blob in >> database >> > but xodus support and control meta in database and blob in filesystem - >> and >> > with backup it sync both places and guarantee persistent - its killer >> > feature dont it? >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >>
