Tor-Einar Jarnbjo ha scritto: > The connections causing the spam hickup this week were _not_ > authenticated, or at least James did not log any authentication attempt: > > 27/10/08 13:14:17 INFO smtpserver: Connection from > wvps212-241-x-y.vps.webfusion.co.uk (212.241.x.y) > 27/10/08 13:14:18 INFO smtpserver: Successfully spooled mail > Mail1225109658790-1134809 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 212.241.x.y for > [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], > [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], > [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], > [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], > [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], > [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], > [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To me, it looks very much as if James is actually accepting to relay > these messages without authentication, although the config file > indicates that it shouldn't. > > Tor
Have you tried to reproduce the same FROM/TO in an SMTP conversation originated remotely to see if JAMES replies you what you expect? Stefano --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
