I haven't seen the article either, although I believe this is the one I was interviewed for. If so, I hope my contribution seemed ok ;-)
Based on the comments I've seen here it sure seems like someone has mixed up architecture and technology. I also am with Anne about this what the heck is Web 2.0 stuff - I don't like the name but I suppose we are stuck with it... What I hope came through though is the need to connect the Web 2.0 technologies to enterprise data sources using Web services. I have blogged a bit about this, but mostly within the overall context of the need to standardize the software industry. The Web 2.0 stuff is a great illustration of the benefits of standardization, and to me it's a good illustration of the kind of thing the industry needs to achive in enterprise software. The importance of standardization to productivity: http://www.iona.com/blogs/newcomer/archives/000255.html Solution through standardization: http://www.iona.com/blogs/newcomer/archives/000258.html How it all ties into Web 2.0: http://www.iona.com/blogs/newcomer/archives/000259.html Eric --- Todd Biske <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There's been a rash of articles on the Web 2.0 and > SOA due to John > deVaDoss' (Microsoft) recent comments. While I > just went to the > eWeek site and couldn't find the article, I know I > saw that table > that you mentioned and I shook my head as well. If > I recall > correctly, the article kept flip-flopping on whether > SOA and Web 2.0 > were complementary or not, and that table didn't > help at all. > > It's a shame that the waters were muddied by that > article, because I > actually think some of the discussion going on > around SOA and Web 2.0 > is very good. I've been making some notes in prep > for a blog entry, > but have had some other things to take care of, so > it's still on the > back burner. I've got strong roots on the user side > of the world, so > tying SOA concepts back to areas where users have to > interact with > systems is always interesting for me. > > -tb > > On Feb 15, 2006, at 3:56 PM, JP Morgenthal wrote: > > > Did anyone catch eWeeks horrible article on SOA > and Web 2.0 in the > > 2/13 issue? Am I crazy or is this the stupidest > thing this > > publication ever printed? Their chart comparing > SOA to Web 2.0 is > > downright asinine. They actually listed the > communication > > mechanism for SOA as SOAP and Web 2.0 as REST. > Ummmm, when did > > SOAP become SOA-centric? Or better yet, when did > SOA become SOAP- > > centric. > > > > > > > > JP > > > > > > > > JP Morgenthal > > Managing Partner > > > > <image001.jpg> > > > > <image002.gif> > > > > Work: 703-648-1520 > > > > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > IM: jmorgenthal (Skype) > > <image003.gif> > > Professional Profile > > My Blog > > > > Avorcor, Inc. > > 12110 Sunset Hills Road > > Suite 450 > > Reston, VA 20190 USA > > > > > > See who we know in common > > > > Want a signature like this? > > > > > > > > > > > > SPONSORED LINKS > > Computer software Computer aided design software > Computer job > > Soa Service-oriented architecture > > > > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS > > > > Visit your group > "service-orientated-architecture" on the web. > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the > Yahoo! Terms of Service. > > > > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/service-orientated-architecture/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
