Anne Thomas Manes wrote:
> Stefan summarized his point with:
>
> Which is exactly my point - the fault is not in UML, nor OO, but in
> using it wrongly.
>
> I agree that UML is not at fault, but I think current tooling is,
> because it focuses too strongly on OO design, leading people to use it
> wrongly. I'd very much like to see someone define a standard SO
> profile for UML.
I think the bigger issue is that we need to employ fewer monkeys and more
developers and engineers. I sense that many companies are conviced that 10
$30k+ programmers are a lot more effective 5 60k+ trained developers and/or
engineers.
You have to know what you need to do, all these design tools help you discover
the possible solutions. But, you also need to know what works, what doesn't
work, and why.
Gregg Wonderly
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/service-orientated-architecture/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
