On 09/12/2013 05:13 PM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
> Jaroslav,
> 
> CustomLauncherTest.java:
> 
> 102: this check could be moved to switch at ll. 108
> otherwise test fails on "sunos" and "linux" because PLATFORM remains unset.

Good idea. Thanks.

> 
> 129: I would prefer don't have pattern like this one ever in shell
> script. Could you prepare a list of VM's to check and just loop over it?
> It makes test better readable. Also I think nowdays we can always use
> server VM.

I tried to mirror the original shell test as closely as possible. It
would be nice if we could rely on the "server" vm only. Definitely more
readable.

-JB-

> 
> -Dmitry
> 
> 
> On 2013-09-12 18:17, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
>> On 09/12/2013 10:22 AM, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
>>> On 09/12/2013 10:12 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>>>> On 09/12/2013 04:45 AM, David Holmes wrote:
>>>>> Hi Jaroslav,
>>>>>
>>>>> You need a copyright notice in the new file.
>>>>>
>>>>> As written this test can only run on a full JDK - so please add it to
>>>>> the :needs_jdk group in TEST.groups. (Does jcmd really needs to come
>>>>> from the test-jdk? And use the VMOPTS passed to the test?)
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there a reason this test can't run on OSX? I know it would need
>>>>> further modification but was wondering if there is something inherent in
>>>>> the test that makes it inapplicable to OSX.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think the test would be a lot simpler if the jdk tests had the hotspot
>>>>> test library's process tools available. :(
>>>>
>>>> We have some, is there an obvious gap?
>>>>
>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/file/e407df8093dc/test/lib/testlibrary/jdk/testlibrary/
>>>
>>> Hm, thanks for the info. I should have used this library instead.
>>>
>>> Please, stand by for the updated webrev.
>>
>> I was able to get rid off the JCMD. Using the testlibrary the target
>> application can recognize its own PID and print it to its stdout. The
>> main application then just reads the stdout to parse the PID. No need
>> for JCMD any more.
>>
>> I could not find a way to remove the dependency on "test.jdk" system
>> property. According to the jtreg web documentation
>> (http://openjdk.java.net/jtreg/vmoptions.html#cmdLineOpts) a "test.java"
>> system property should be available but in fact is not. But it seems
>> that the testlibrary uses "test.jdk" system property too.
>>
>> The test does not run on OSX because nobody built the launcher binary :)
>> I think it is a kind of DIY so I took the liberty of adding a
>> linux-amd64 launcher while working on the test.
>>
>> While working with the test library I realized I was missing a crucial
>> feature (at least for my purposes) - waiting for a certain message to
>> appear in the stdout/stderr of the launched process. Very often I need
>> to wait for the target process to get to certain point before the test
>> can be allowed to continue - and the point is indicated by a message in
>> stdout/stderr. Currently all the proc tools are designed to work in
>> "batch" mode - the whole stdout/stderr is captured in strings and
>> analyzed after the target process died - and are not suitable for this
>> kind of usage.
>>
>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8004926/webrev.01
>>
>>>
>>> -JB-
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Chris.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> David
>>>>> -----
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/09/2013 1:39 AM, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
>>>>>> Please, review the patch for an intermittently failing test.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The test is a shell test, using files for the interprocess
>>>>>> synchronization. This leads to intermittent failures.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In order to fix this the test is rewritten in Java - the original
>>>>>> functionality and outputs should be 100% preserved. The patch is
>>>>>> unfortunately a bit difficult to follow since there is no similarity
>>>>>> between the *.sh and *.java file so one needs to go through the new
>>>>>> source in whole.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The changes in "launcher" files are all about adding permissions to
>>>>>> execute (0755) and as such the webrev shows no differences.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Issue  : JDK-8004926
>>>>>> Webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8004926/webrev.00
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -JB-
>>>>>>
>>>
>>
> 
> 

Reply via email to