On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 05:45:29 GMT, David Holmes <dhol...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> Agreed. But I don't think "Thin locks" is an option as that was specifically > an IBM locking implementation. Historically Hotspot's locking mechanism has > internally been referred to as stack-locks, so I would suggest > UseNewStackLocks They don't use the stack anymore; would this not be us using a wrong name just for history's sake? ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10907
