On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 06:31:42 GMT, Roman Kennke <rken...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> > > Agreed. But I don't think "Thin locks" is an option as that was > > > specifically an IBM locking implementation. Historically Hotspot's > > > locking mechanism has internally been referred to as stack-locks, so I > > > would suggest UseNewStackLocks > > > > > > They don't use the stack anymore; would this not be us using a wrong name > > just for history's sake? > > Well, it's still got the lock-stacks. :-D Yes, but we have variables like "is_stack_locked" etc, without an "old" qualifier. Idk, up to you. Better than UseFastLocking I guess. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10907
