On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 06:05:38 GMT, Thomas Stuefe <stu...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> > > > Agreed. But I don't think "Thin locks" is an option as that was > > specifically an IBM locking implementation. Historically Hotspot's locking > > mechanism has internally been referred to as stack-locks, so I would > > suggest UseNewStackLocks > > > > They don't use the stack anymore; would this not be us using a wrong name > just for history's sake? Well, it's still got the lock-stacks. :-D ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10907
