On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 22:31:43 GMT, Chris Plummer <cjplum...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Not exactly, the stderr is just ignored. We don't expect anything so just >> ignore it. > > So previously we would terminate the debuggee the first time we saw any > output on stderr, and now instead we ignore stderr. What if instead we > process stderr the same as stdout? Would that cause a failure because the > output is not what the test expects? What if there really is an issue > launching the JVM that is expressed on stderr? Wouldn't we want that detected > by this code? Agree, lets process stderr like stdout. This shouldn't change logic of test but allow us at least to see stderr. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15499#discussion_r1310914239
