On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 22:18:24 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty <dcu...@openjdk.org> 
wrote:

>> Thank you for the example and for catching the typo. The timeout factor also 
>> needs to be passed to the native side. I think, this fragment is not worth 
>> this kind of extra complexity. One approach would be to just make it big 
>> enough, eg. make it 100 seconds instead of 10.  Another - to get rid of this 
>> trap at all. What would you prefer?
>
> So that would mean that the native side would always wait for 100 seconds?
> Or will it wait for some increment of time upto a maximum of 100 seconds?

It wait for some increment of time upto a maximum of 100 seconds.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18419#discussion_r1544937616

Reply via email to