On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 15:45:02 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn <sspit...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Note that `java_thread` may already be null so we don't get to execute line >> 836. > > Thanks, David. The potential issue I'm still concerned about is that a > subsequent handshaking can also observe the JavaThread (and virtual thread as > well) in a VTMS transition when there is no protection with a > `VTMSTransitionDisabler`. > Note that java_thread may already be null so we don't get to execute line 836. Right. I guess, this answers my comment about the line 839. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26287#discussion_r2229142376
