On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 20:35:25 GMT, David Holmes <dhol...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>>> Note that java_thread may already be null so we don't get to execute line >>> 836. >> >> Right. I guess, this answers my comment about the line 839. > > Once in the handshake the carrier (and thus virtual thread) is "frozen" with > regards to any transition. It could be anywhere in the process of > mounting/unmounting (depending of course exactly where the carrier might > respond to the handshake request), and the actual handshake operation has to > deal with that. But that is true no matter how you extracted a reference to > the carrier. As I said before the only thing this change guarantees is that > the carrier is protected by the TLH and can't fully terminate whilst > handshaking with it. Okay, thanks. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26287#discussion_r2230252813
