On Wed, 16 Sep 2026 08:24:25 GMT, Amit Kumar <[email protected]> wrote:

>> @theRealAph
>> I'm not opposed to fixing this the proper way using DWARF CFI unwinding, but 
>> that is a much bigger job. Until that is done, this PR fixes a possible 
>> failing `assert()` when trying to profile using `gprofng`.
>
> Hi @fbredber , can you merge master and pull changes from 
> https://github.com/offamitkumar/jdk/commit/f15466cbdf8e8f827db87286810ab7866a7fb130,
>  I ran testcase on s390 and it seems it is disabled. The architecture is 
> mentioned as `s390` instead of `s390x`.

@offamitkumar
I merged in master and also your 
https://github.com/offamitkumar/jdk/commit/f15466cbdf8e8f827db87286810ab7866a7fb130
 fix. The `s/s390/s390x/` was a nice finding, thanks! Now 
`TEST=serviceability/AsyncGetCallTrace/MyPackage/ASGCTBaseTest.java` works like 
a charm on `s390x`, at least in QEMU. :)

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/32850#issuecomment-5711769412

Reply via email to