Jeffrey,

This looks good. See below for a couple of comments ...

Paul

Jeffrey Huang wrote:
> 
> Thanks very much of your review, all the comments are very well except 
> the license issues
> that I am not quite clear, please see inline

> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~jeffreyh/epydoc/ 

> 
> Paul Cunningham wrote:

>>
>> 2. usr/src/cmd/epydoc/METADATA
>> Cosmetic: align the fields better, eg.
>> NAME: automatic api documentation generation for python
>> PROGRAM: epydoc
>> etc

you could align the fields better (but it maybe webrev messing it up), ie.
    4 PACKAGE:        SUNWepydoc
    5 LICENSE:        MIT License
-> 6 URL:                    http://sourceforge.net/projects/epydoc
-> 7 SRC: 
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/epydoc/epydoc-3.0.1.tar.gz
    8 SUPPORT:        Community
    9 BUGTRAQ:        solaris/utility/eypdoc
->10 OSR:                    10594
   11 OWNER:          Jeffrey Huang<jeffrey.huang at sun.com>

>> 5. usr/src/pkgdefs/SUNWepydoc/copyright
>> The epydoc/METADATA says "LICENSE: MIT License" so
>> shouldn't that licence be included here.
> I checked the source and 
> http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php,
> the MIT license are these words, any other license should I put?

okay - I was just checking (I didn't know what the MIT licence looked like).

>> Add the copyright lines from the pkg src at the top, see ..
>> "http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/sfw/usr/src/pkgdefs/SUNWmeld/copyright";
>>  
>>
> meld is GPL v2 license, should I add that? Or add the first 10 lines 
> above my license?

I think you need to add the pkg owner copyright lines from the pkg's 
source files, eg. for meld they were (extract) ...
   11 Copyright (C) 2002-2006 Stephen Kennedy <stevek (a] gnome.org>
   12 Copyright (C) 2003-2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
   etc.
so I think you need to add the equivalent for eypdoc (at the top)


-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Cunningham
Software Engineer
Tadpole Business Unit

Reply via email to