Jeffrey, This looks good. See below for a couple of comments ...
Paul Jeffrey Huang wrote: > > Thanks very much of your review, all the comments are very well except > the license issues > that I am not quite clear, please see inline > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~jeffreyh/epydoc/ > > Paul Cunningham wrote: >> >> 2. usr/src/cmd/epydoc/METADATA >> Cosmetic: align the fields better, eg. >> NAME: automatic api documentation generation for python >> PROGRAM: epydoc >> etc you could align the fields better (but it maybe webrev messing it up), ie. 4 PACKAGE: SUNWepydoc 5 LICENSE: MIT License -> 6 URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/epydoc -> 7 SRC: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/epydoc/epydoc-3.0.1.tar.gz 8 SUPPORT: Community 9 BUGTRAQ: solaris/utility/eypdoc ->10 OSR: 10594 11 OWNER: Jeffrey Huang<jeffrey.huang at sun.com> >> 5. usr/src/pkgdefs/SUNWepydoc/copyright >> The epydoc/METADATA says "LICENSE: MIT License" so >> shouldn't that licence be included here. > I checked the source and > http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php, > the MIT license are these words, any other license should I put? okay - I was just checking (I didn't know what the MIT licence looked like). >> Add the copyright lines from the pkg src at the top, see .. >> "http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/sfw/usr/src/pkgdefs/SUNWmeld/copyright" >> >> > meld is GPL v2 license, should I add that? Or add the first 10 lines > above my license? I think you need to add the pkg owner copyright lines from the pkg's source files, eg. for meld they were (extract) ... 11 Copyright (C) 2002-2006 Stephen Kennedy <stevek (a] gnome.org> 12 Copyright (C) 2003-2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. etc. so I think you need to add the equivalent for eypdoc (at the top) -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Paul Cunningham Software Engineer Tadpole Business Unit
