* Dermot McCluskey <dermot.mccluskey at sun.com> [2007-02-14 05:16]: > Stephen, > > So, this isn't the question Laca asked about info, but should we > > really be preserving SFWsfinf? (Shouldn't the bison info files be in > > bison's package? And same for manual pages?) > > We discussed this a few months back in the BISON thread. > The consensus seemed to be that it's a good idea to distribute > SUNWsfinf/sfman(& sfhea?) back into the main packages, > but as this wasn't explicitly stipulated in the /usr/gnu case > we should look at this as a separate change after the initial batch > has gone through. > > I still prefer to do the initial putback that has been agreed now, > and then tackle items like this afterwards. Sounds good.
- Stephen -- Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems stephen.hahn at sun.com http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
