On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Stephen Hahn wrote: > > ... > I guess part of the issue is knowing what the long-term intent > regarding the existing vi(1) is.
My thinking was to assume vi(1) is current vi(1) indefinitely. This analogy comes to mind: vim is to vi(1) as ncftp is to ftp(1) Eric > If vi(1) is current vi(1) > indefinitely, then vim can go in a big metacluster and I'll just > suffer in some tighter install situations; if vi(1) is meant to be > vim-as-vi, then my request becomes more of a requirement
