On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Eric Boutilier wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Stephen Hahn wrote: >> >> ... >> I guess part of the issue is knowing what the long-term intent >> regarding the existing vi(1) is. > > My thinking was to assume vi(1) is current vi(1) indefinitely. This analogy > comes to mind: vim is to vi(1) as ncftp is to ftp(1)
(Hm, a less than perfect anoalogy since ncftp is in /usr/sfw/bin, not /usr/bin)
