Thanks for the info.. It would be great if anyone in the alias answer me on which consolidation these encryption packages should go..
-Spoorthy Vladimir Marek wrote: >> So md5 is available in SUNWperl584core package. Some questions I have. >> > > Hopefully I'll be able to pair them with answers! > > > >> If I want to port two other encryption routines along with crypt-cbc, Is >> there anything I need to follow other than OSR ? >> > > Oh yes, there is. There is the PROCESS. It's not easy if someone is not > sitting next to you, so you'll have more questions in time. > > Integration: > https://opendorfl.czech/twiki/bin/view/OPENdorfl/OSSPackagesSolarisRPE_Process > > Packaging: > https://opendorfl.czech/twiki/bin/view/OPENdorfl/OSSPackagesSolarisRPE > > > > >> What kind of naming convention I should follow while registering package >> name ? Should these packages also be prefixed with SUNW ? >> > > Yes SUNW is necessary. For example XML::Parser is SUNWperl-xml-parser > and SUNWperl-xml-parser-devel-share (later are man pages). However this > does not reflect that it's 5.8.4 XML::Parser and not 5.10 XML::Parser, > so if I let my imagination go wild, then perhaps > > SUNWperl58-crypt-cbc > > > >> Which C-Team will be reviewing this ? >> > > That depends why you want to integrate the module. I guess that it's not > something core Solaris can't live without, so SFW gate (and c-team) > feels appropriate. > > > >> To which consolidation does these kind of encryption packages come under ? >> > > I'm afraid I can't answer this question. So far I thought that we can't > deliver (strong) encryption, and it's separate package (SUWNcrypto or > something like that?). But I heard that for ON and OpenSolaris this is > different. I myself would be like if someone could explain the situation > to us. > > > >> Or let me know whom(/alias) can I contact to find these answers. This >> info I will need when I register the package. >> > > Generally this is appropriate alias. > > Good luck! > >
