Probably SFW, since that's where perl 5.10 is integrating and future perl
modules will go, and it's not a GUI or something that otherwise belongs
in Desktop or X. You'll want to coordinate with John Sonnenschein, who
is doing the Perl 5.10 integration.
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith at sun.com
Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering
Spoorthy H.S wrote:
> Thanks for the info.. It would be great if anyone in the alias answer me
> on which consolidation these encryption packages should go..
>
> -Spoorthy
>
> Vladimir Marek wrote:
>>> So md5 is available in SUNWperl584core package. Some questions I have.
>>>
>>
>> Hopefully I'll be able to pair them with answers!
>>
>>
>>
>>> If I want to port two other encryption routines along with crypt-cbc,
>>> Is there anything I need to follow other than OSR ?
>>>
>>
>> Oh yes, there is. There is the PROCESS. It's not easy if someone is not
>> sitting next to you, so you'll have more questions in time.
>>
>> Integration:
>> https://opendorfl.czech/twiki/bin/view/OPENdorfl/OSSPackagesSolarisRPE_Process
>>
>>
>> Packaging:
>> https://opendorfl.czech/twiki/bin/view/OPENdorfl/OSSPackagesSolarisRPE
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> What kind of naming convention I should follow while registering
>>> package name ? Should these packages also be prefixed with SUNW ?
>>>
>>
>> Yes SUNW is necessary. For example XML::Parser is SUNWperl-xml-parser
>> and SUNWperl-xml-parser-devel-share (later are man pages). However this
>> does not reflect that it's 5.8.4 XML::Parser and not 5.10 XML::Parser,
>> so if I let my imagination go wild, then perhaps
>>
>> SUNWperl58-crypt-cbc
>>
>>
>>
>>> Which C-Team will be reviewing this ?
>>>
>>
>> That depends why you want to integrate the module. I guess that it's not
>> something core Solaris can't live without, so SFW gate (and c-team)
>> feels appropriate.
>>
>>
>>
>>> To which consolidation does these kind of encryption packages come
>>> under ?
>>>
>>
>> I'm afraid I can't answer this question. So far I thought that we can't
>> deliver (strong) encryption, and it's separate package (SUWNcrypto or
>> something like that?). But I heard that for ON and OpenSolaris this is
>> different. I myself would be like if someone could explain the situation
>> to us.
>>
>>
>>
>>> Or let me know whom(/alias) can I contact to find these answers.
>>> This info I will need when I register the package.
>>>
>>
>> Generally this is appropriate alias.
>>
>> Good luck!
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> sfwnv-discuss mailing list
> sfwnv-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sfwnv-discuss
