I meant Encryption packages that have been ported.
Norm Jacobs wrote:
>
> Do you mean new encryption algorithms in nevada in general? Perl
> support? or something else?
>
> -Norm
>
> Spoorthy H.S wrote:
>> One more information I needed.
>>
>> If you have any info on whether any Encryption modules have been
>> ported to nevada builds, let me know.
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Spoorthy
>>
>>
>> Norm Jacobs wrote:
>>>
>>> SUNWperl510core and SUNWperl510usr willbe in build 122
>>>
>>> -Norm
>>>
>>>
>>> Spoorthy H.S wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Norm,
>>>> Thanks for all the info
>>>> One more question. SUNWperl510 will be available from which build ?
>>>> Build 122 ?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Spoorthy
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Norm Jacobs wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Perl 5.8.4 is delivered in the SUNWperl584* packages.
>>>>> Perl 5.10.0 is delivered in the SUNWperl510* packages.
>>>>> Talk to John Sonnenschein about the transition from 5.8.4 to
>>>>> 5.10. I expect that SUNWperl584* packages will never contain 5.10
>>>>> bits and they will ultimately go away. As far as md5 support
>>>>> goes, SUNWperl510core also contains md5 support.
>>>>>
>>>>> Since the intention is to transition to 5.10, you should plan to
>>>>> deliver your bits on 5.10. If you have a consumer that needs them
>>>>> before we complete a transition to 5.10, then you may have to
>>>>> deliver them on 5.8.4 as well for a short period of time.
>>>>>
>>>>> As far as getting and eccn goes, you need to email the export
>>>>> control folks at export_eccn with the details of what you are
>>>>> planning on integrating. They may ask you for additional
>>>>> information before them give you an ECCN.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Norm
>>>>>
>>>>> Spoorthy H.S wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Norm ,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> SFW cosolidation is fine.
>>>>>> As I heard, md5 is available in SUNWperl584core package. So, It
>>>>>> will be perl 5.8.4. Does the package get updated when perl
>>>>>> version is updated to 5.10 ?
>>>>>> Also, Could you send me the link where I can follow procedure to
>>>>>> be followed to get ECCN since the package is Encryption module.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> Spoorthy
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Norm Jacobs wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, since Perl seems to be migrating into SFW, it probably
>>>>>>> makes sense to bring Perl modules into SFW with it, unless they
>>>>>>> are tightly bound to something in another consolidation or use
>>>>>>> private interfaces in another consolidation. John integrated
>>>>>>> Perl 5.10 into the SFW gate earlier this week, so it should show
>>>>>>> up in build 122 and live along side 5.8.4 until 5.8.4 can go
>>>>>>> away. Were I planning on delivering a Perl module into Solaris
>>>>>>> any time soon, I would be delivering it on top of 5.10 now.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Norm
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>>>>>>>> Probably SFW, since that's where perl 5.10 is integrating and
>>>>>>>> future perl
>>>>>>>> modules will go, and it's not a GUI or something that otherwise
>>>>>>>> belongs
>>>>>>>> in Desktop or X. You'll want to coordinate with John
>>>>>>>> Sonnenschein, who
>>>>>>>> is doing the Perl 5.10 integration.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith at sun.com
>>>>>>>> Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Spoorthy H.S wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the info.. It would be great if anyone in the alias
>>>>>>>>> answer me
>>>>>>>>> on which consolidation these encryption packages should go..
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -Spoorthy
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Vladimir Marek wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So md5 is available in SUNWperl584core package. Some
>>>>>>>>>>> questions I have.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hopefully I'll be able to pair them with answers!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If I want to port two other encryption routines along with
>>>>>>>>>>> crypt-cbc,
>>>>>>>>>>> Is there anything I need to follow other than OSR ?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Oh yes, there is. There is the PROCESS. It's not easy if
>>>>>>>>>> someone is not
>>>>>>>>>> sitting next to you, so you'll have more questions in time.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Integration:
>>>>>>>>>> https://opendorfl.czech/twiki/bin/view/OPENdorfl/OSSPackagesSolarisRPE_Process
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Packaging:
>>>>>>>>>> https://opendorfl.czech/twiki/bin/view/OPENdorfl/OSSPackagesSolarisRPE
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> What kind of naming convention I should follow while
>>>>>>>>>>> registering
>>>>>>>>>>> package name ? Should these packages also be prefixed with
>>>>>>>>>>> SUNW ?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yes SUNW is necessary. For example XML::Parser is
>>>>>>>>>> SUNWperl-xml-parser
>>>>>>>>>> and SUNWperl-xml-parser-devel-share (later are man pages).
>>>>>>>>>> However this
>>>>>>>>>> does not reflect that it's 5.8.4 XML::Parser and not 5.10
>>>>>>>>>> XML::Parser,
>>>>>>>>>> so if I let my imagination go wild, then perhaps
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> SUNWperl58-crypt-cbc
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Which C-Team will be reviewing this ?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That depends why you want to integrate the module. I guess
>>>>>>>>>> that it's not
>>>>>>>>>> something core Solaris can't live without, so SFW gate (and
>>>>>>>>>> c-team)
>>>>>>>>>> feels appropriate.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> To which consolidation does these kind of encryption
>>>>>>>>>>> packages come
>>>>>>>>>>> under ?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm afraid I can't answer this question. So far I thought
>>>>>>>>>> that we can't
>>>>>>>>>> deliver (strong) encryption, and it's separate package
>>>>>>>>>> (SUWNcrypto or
>>>>>>>>>> something like that?). But I heard that for ON and
>>>>>>>>>> OpenSolaris this is
>>>>>>>>>> different. I myself would be like if someone could explain
>>>>>>>>>> the situation
>>>>>>>>>> to us.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Or let me know whom(/alias) can I contact to find these
>>>>>>>>>>> answers.
>>>>>>>>>>> This info I will need when I register the package.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Generally this is appropriate alias.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Good luck!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> sfwnv-discuss mailing list
>>>>>>>>> sfwnv-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>>>>>>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sfwnv-discuss
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> sfwnv-discuss mailing list
>>>>>>>> sfwnv-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>>>>>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sfwnv-discuss
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>
