Do you mean new encryption algorithms in nevada in general? Perl support? or something else?
-Norm Spoorthy H.S wrote: > One more information I needed. > > If you have any info on whether any Encryption modules have been > ported to nevada builds, let me know. > > > Thanks > Spoorthy > > > Norm Jacobs wrote: >> >> SUNWperl510core and SUNWperl510usr willbe in build 122 >> >> -Norm >> >> >> Spoorthy H.S wrote: >>> >>> Norm, >>> Thanks for all the info >>> One more question. SUNWperl510 will be available from which build ? >>> Build 122 ? >>> >>> Thanks >>> Spoorthy >>> >>> >>> Norm Jacobs wrote: >>>> >>>> Perl 5.8.4 is delivered in the SUNWperl584* packages. >>>> Perl 5.10.0 is delivered in the SUNWperl510* packages. >>>> Talk to John Sonnenschein about the transition from 5.8.4 to 5.10. >>>> I expect that SUNWperl584* packages will never contain 5.10 bits >>>> and they will ultimately go away. As far as md5 support goes, >>>> SUNWperl510core also contains md5 support. >>>> >>>> Since the intention is to transition to 5.10, you should plan to >>>> deliver your bits on 5.10. If you have a consumer that needs them >>>> before we complete a transition to 5.10, then you may have to >>>> deliver them on 5.8.4 as well for a short period of time. >>>> >>>> As far as getting and eccn goes, you need to email the export >>>> control folks at export_eccn with the details of what you are >>>> planning on integrating. They may ask you for additional >>>> information before them give you an ECCN. >>>> >>>> -Norm >>>> >>>> Spoorthy H.S wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Norm , >>>>> >>>>> SFW cosolidation is fine. >>>>> As I heard, md5 is available in SUNWperl584core package. So, It >>>>> will be perl 5.8.4. Does the package get updated when perl version >>>>> is updated to 5.10 ? >>>>> Also, Could you send me the link where I can follow procedure to >>>>> be followed to get ECCN since the package is Encryption module. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> Spoorthy >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Norm Jacobs wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes, since Perl seems to be migrating into SFW, it probably makes >>>>>> sense to bring Perl modules into SFW with it, unless they are >>>>>> tightly bound to something in another consolidation or use >>>>>> private interfaces in another consolidation. John integrated >>>>>> Perl 5.10 into the SFW gate earlier this week, so it should show >>>>>> up in build 122 and live along side 5.8.4 until 5.8.4 can go >>>>>> away. Were I planning on delivering a Perl module into Solaris >>>>>> any time soon, I would be delivering it on top of 5.10 now. >>>>>> >>>>>> -Norm >>>>>> >>>>>> Alan Coopersmith wrote: >>>>>>> Probably SFW, since that's where perl 5.10 is integrating and >>>>>>> future perl >>>>>>> modules will go, and it's not a GUI or something that otherwise >>>>>>> belongs >>>>>>> in Desktop or X. You'll want to coordinate with John >>>>>>> Sonnenschein, who >>>>>>> is doing the Perl 5.10 integration. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith at sun.com >>>>>>> Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Spoorthy H.S wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks for the info.. It would be great if anyone in the alias >>>>>>>> answer me >>>>>>>> on which consolidation these encryption packages should go.. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -Spoorthy >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Vladimir Marek wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So md5 is available in SUNWperl584core package. Some >>>>>>>>>> questions I have. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hopefully I'll be able to pair them with answers! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If I want to port two other encryption routines along with >>>>>>>>>> crypt-cbc, >>>>>>>>>> Is there anything I need to follow other than OSR ? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Oh yes, there is. There is the PROCESS. It's not easy if >>>>>>>>> someone is not >>>>>>>>> sitting next to you, so you'll have more questions in time. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Integration: >>>>>>>>> https://opendorfl.czech/twiki/bin/view/OPENdorfl/OSSPackagesSolarisRPE_Process >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Packaging: >>>>>>>>> https://opendorfl.czech/twiki/bin/view/OPENdorfl/OSSPackagesSolarisRPE >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> What kind of naming convention I should follow while registering >>>>>>>>>> package name ? Should these packages also be prefixed with >>>>>>>>>> SUNW ? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yes SUNW is necessary. For example XML::Parser is >>>>>>>>> SUNWperl-xml-parser >>>>>>>>> and SUNWperl-xml-parser-devel-share (later are man pages). >>>>>>>>> However this >>>>>>>>> does not reflect that it's 5.8.4 XML::Parser and not 5.10 >>>>>>>>> XML::Parser, >>>>>>>>> so if I let my imagination go wild, then perhaps >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> SUNWperl58-crypt-cbc >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Which C-Team will be reviewing this ? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That depends why you want to integrate the module. I guess >>>>>>>>> that it's not >>>>>>>>> something core Solaris can't live without, so SFW gate (and >>>>>>>>> c-team) >>>>>>>>> feels appropriate. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> To which consolidation does these kind of encryption packages >>>>>>>>>> come >>>>>>>>>> under ? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'm afraid I can't answer this question. So far I thought that >>>>>>>>> we can't >>>>>>>>> deliver (strong) encryption, and it's separate package >>>>>>>>> (SUWNcrypto or >>>>>>>>> something like that?). But I heard that for ON and OpenSolaris >>>>>>>>> this is >>>>>>>>> different. I myself would be like if someone could explain the >>>>>>>>> situation >>>>>>>>> to us. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Or let me know whom(/alias) can I contact to find these answers. >>>>>>>>>> This info I will need when I register the package. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Generally this is appropriate alias. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Good luck! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> sfwnv-discuss mailing list >>>>>>>> sfwnv-discuss at opensolaris.org >>>>>>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sfwnv-discuss >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> sfwnv-discuss mailing list >>>>>>> sfwnv-discuss at opensolaris.org >>>>>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sfwnv-discuss >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>
